tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8395646.post5098723149744289319..comments2024-03-06T19:21:15.708-05:00Comments on RealChoice: Tiller defense: Larry said I couldChristina Duniganhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04785550737493692252noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8395646.post-14853180709504747702009-06-13T21:50:34.356-04:002009-06-13T21:50:34.356-04:00Here is the link to the statement; and here is Lif...<a href="http://www.kwch.com/Global/story.asp?S=8612013" rel="nofollow">Here</a> is the link to the statement; and <a href="http://www.lifenews.com/state3366.html" rel="nofollow">here</a> is LifeNews.com's rebuttal to that interpretation, fwiw.Kathyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10118292622669944944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8395646.post-67396139761010625592009-06-13T18:03:29.695-04:002009-06-13T18:03:29.695-04:00Cool, Kathy. Got a link?Cool, Kathy. Got a link?Christina Duniganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04785550737493692252noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8395646.post-4170130189977034542009-06-13T12:52:32.094-04:002009-06-13T12:52:32.094-04:00I recently read the Grand Jury statement in which ...I recently read the Grand Jury statement in which they declined to indict him -- basically it said, "We believe he was performing abortions in direct contradiction to what the clear intent of the law was... but since the Supreme Court insists that these abortions be allowed, we won't indict since he'll walk." And they recommended the law be changed. How, I'm not sure, since the wording is as strict as possible under the current SC rulings about abortion. Argh.Kathyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10118292622669944944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8395646.post-65253209076663774932009-03-27T18:38:00.000-04:002009-03-27T18:38:00.000-04:00It was an abortion of justice. Plain and simple.Th...It was an abortion of justice. Plain and simple.<BR/><BR/>This trial established once and for all that there is NOTHING Tiller can do so bad, or so flagrantly in violation of the law, that he'll be held accountable by his fellow citizens.<BR/><BR/>Are they PROUD to be a baby-killing mecca?Christina Duniganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04785550737493692252noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8395646.post-58740597690355394322009-03-27T15:30:00.000-04:002009-03-27T15:30:00.000-04:00"And at the end of the Tiller trial, they can stil..."And at the end of the Tiller trial, they can still kill the baby". <BR/><BR/>*Sigh*, the jury found him not guilty. I had high hopes for this trial. What a miscarriage of justice.army_wifehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03769443501122541176noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8395646.post-51376618806169855842009-03-26T17:01:00.000-04:002009-03-26T17:01:00.000-04:00It's all gonna hinge on how they view all the cons...It's all gonna hinge on how they view all the consultations with the medical board and the lawyer.<BR/><BR/>If they see it as "He was trying to figure out how to comply with the law" he'll walk.<BR/><BR/>If they see it as "He was trying to figure out how to evade the law" he's screwed.Christina Duniganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04785550737493692252noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8395646.post-13488649813446268912009-03-26T10:43:00.000-04:002009-03-26T10:43:00.000-04:00OK, so Tiller basically made the prosecution's cas...OK, so Tiller basically made the prosecution's case FOR them right there. He had to admit to it all. So... I hope the jury is paying close attention! I don't see how they could NOT convict now, for sure. <BR/><BR/>As a side note, although I know the issue at hand isn't funny, I had to smile at the three stooges joke in there. I also had another funny thought. I bet after that testimony, Tiller sat and thought about it and mentally did his best Homer Simpson impression -- "D'OH!!!"army_wifehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03769443501122541176noreply@blogger.com