tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8395646.post4803491230909473663..comments2024-03-06T19:21:15.708-05:00Comments on RealChoice: Heading off NAF damage controlChristina Duniganhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04785550737493692252noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8395646.post-52322651691085052742011-01-25T13:31:52.081-05:002011-01-25T13:31:52.081-05:00"There are always a few bad practicioners in ..."There are always a few bad practicioners in every speciality in medicine."<br /><br />Okay. And wouldn't how those bad practitioners are handled by those cited with weeding them out tell us something about their values and standards?<br /><br />Did the NAF send patients to Gosnell? Did NAF member clinics collect his fees for him and lend him their facilities to begin some of his abortions? Did the NAF do anything about it when they discovered just how filthy and horrendous conditions were at his clinic?<br /><br />And isn't there a higher standard for an abortion doctor than simply 'he doesn't kill the women he operates on'?<br />Could we also expect that a good doctor would not perforate uteruses, have lay people administer anesthesia, and other errors we've seen from NAF member physicians/clinics?Headmistress, zookeeperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14071449326819510530noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8395646.post-65893254699073819942011-01-25T12:57:59.225-05:002011-01-25T12:57:59.225-05:00But my point wasn't whether abortion in genera...But my point wasn't whether abortion in general is safe or not. It's about NAF promising referrals only to safe facilities, then turning over their trusting patients to Kermit Gosnell. <br /><br />Don't you think they should be held accountable for that? Or should they get a pass because all six patients survived?Christina Duniganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04785550737493692252noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8395646.post-18929987344789891242011-01-24T19:25:18.623-05:002011-01-24T19:25:18.623-05:00I'm not talking about Gosnell. I'm talkin...I'm not talking about Gosnell. I'm talking about abortions in USA.<br /><br />Gosnell was a rare exception.OperationCounterstrikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11877707857942926743noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8395646.post-39477132296592347662011-01-24T18:48:30.544-05:002011-01-24T18:48:30.544-05:00So you're saying it was okay for NAF to send p...So you're saying it was okay for NAF to send patients to Gosnell, since he killed such a low percentage of them?Christina Duniganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04785550737493692252noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8395646.post-63450170897073269052011-01-24T17:25:19.470-05:002011-01-24T17:25:19.470-05:00And in spite of all these quacks, abortion in USA ...And in spite of all these quacks, abortion in USA kills less than one patient per hundred thousand procedures.<br /><br />Getting an abortion in USA is safer than driving to work.<br /><br />That's because the very large majority of abortion docs are competent and do not malpractice. The quacks are rare exceptions. There are always a few bad practicioners in every speciality in medicine.OperationCounterstrikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11877707857942926743noreply@blogger.com