Blog roundup: Better dead than annoyed redux, and more

Here is another voice in the "Better killed by prochoicers than annoyed by prolifers" chorus. She doesn't allow non-members to comment, but you can email her at editors@womensenews.org to let her know that you're touched by her dedication to the war to wipe out the fetal scourge.

****

And another one. What makes these people so willing to overlook fatal butchery by abortionists, and so passionate about cutting off a woman's last chance to avoid an abortion? Is this a matter of "misery loves company"?

****

Another rally for cheap, convenient abortion. They don't want any of those "deadly, back alley abortions"! But, of course, fatal legal abortions are okay, because those abortions were, I guess, cheap and convenient. Why all the brouhaha over hypothetical women who might die, and such heartless indifference to women dying right now? Exactly who is putting the unborn ahead of the born?

****

On a lighter note, Raving Conservative offers a clever response to a typical pro-abortion lie:

One of the most common arguments hear from supporters of abortion is that there is no such medical procedure as "partial birth abortion".

Well, then you won't mind if we ban them, will you?