The idea that the abortion researchers at the Centers for Disease Control actually care about women's deaths from safe, legal abortion should be blown out of the water by looking at how they dealt with the death of Latachie Veal.
Latachie was 17 years old, and 22 weeks pregnant, when Robert Dale Crist performed an abortion on her at Houston's West Loop Clinic November 2, 1991.
According to Latachie's family, she bled heavily at the clinic, and
cried out to the staff for help. They told her that her symptoms were
normal, and sent her home. Several hours later, Latachie stopped
breathing. Her brother-in-law called 911 while her sister did CPR, to no
avail. Latachie was dead on arrival at Ben Taub Hospital.
If Latachie's death certificate had been filled out properly, with the
notation of the abortion in the proper box, using the proper ICD-9 code,
then theoretically the National Center for Health Statistics would spot
the abortion code and report it. But most states send only a
statistical sample of their death certificate data to the NCHS. So the
CDC would be notified of Latachie's death through the NCHS only if the
death certificate was properly filled out, and Latachie's death
certificate was among those abstracted and sent to the NCHS.
But still, according to abortion defenders, Latachie's death would
nevertheless be automatically reported to the Centers for Disease
Control. They're not clear on who is supposed to report the death. Was
West Loop Clinic supposed to report it? Was Crist supposed to report it?
Was Ben Taub Hospital supposed to report it? Was the medical examiner
supposed to report it? Was the Texas Department of Health supposed to
report it? The CDC says it gets abortion death information from
abortionists, abortion facilities, hospitals, and state health
departments, but it does not mention that the reporting is not
mandatory.
This does not mean that Latachie's death went utterly unnoticed.
Latachie's family filed suit, retaining the flamboyant "Racehorse"
Haynes as their attorney. The case was highly publicized, both in Texas
and in Missouri, where Crist had performed a fatal abortion on Diane Boyd, a 19-year-old developmentally disabled woman who had been raped in the institution where she'd lived.
The mainstream publicity went beyond the usual newspaper articles, with
Crist giving television interviews calling the publicity "media hype"
and "a political event." Haynes retorted, "I wish he would have a copy
of the 911 tape.... If he would talk to the parents, if he would talk to
the sister as she gave her CPR or talk to the brother-in-law as she was
breathing her last breath and see then if he thinks it's a media
event."
With all this mainstream publicity in two states, prolife organizations
picked up the story, and it was reported in prolife newsletters around
the nation.
A lot of people very quickly found out about the abortion death of 17-year-old Latachie Veal. But did the CDC?
At the 1992 National Abortion Federation
Risk Management Seminar in Dallas, Crist spoke openly of Latachie's
death. (He did not, of course, mention her name; I've concluded that
he's discussing Latachie's death, since there's been no evidence of any
another 17-year-old abortion patient of his who died in 1991.) Crist
blamed the death not on malpractice, but on disseminated intravascular
coagulopathy -- a clotting disorder that can be triggered during an abortion.
Present at that Risk Management Seminar, where Crist chattered about Latachie's death, were two -- count 'em -- two-- staffers from the Centers for Disease Control's abortion surveillance activities area: Stanley Henshaw and Lisa Koonin. Henshaw's presence isn't quite as remarkable as Koonin's. It was Lisa
Koonin, specifically, whose job it was to "verify" abortion deaths, and
obtain copies of death certificates. These she was to pass on to a
research fellow, Clarice Green, who would then gather the full
information about the case.
In spite of all the publicity, in spite of the lawsuit, in spite of the
prolifers shouting from the rooftops, in spite of the abortionist
discussing the death at an event attended by the very woman whose job it
was to notice abortion deaths, the Centers for Disease Control did not
notice Latachie's death. Their 1991 Abortion Surveillance Report,
published in May of 1995, did not even make any mention of
abortion mortality. And when we at Life Dynamics filed a request for
information about abortion deaths, we found that the CDC counted zero --
count 'em -- zero -- abortion deaths among women of Latachie's race in the 15 - 19 age range. In other words, they didn't even notice.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but if the CDC failed to notice this
highly-publicized death, discussed openly at an event attended by two of
their abortion surveillance staffers, exactly what does it take to get
them to notice an abortion death? And how can we even pretend to believe
that any serious attempt to accurately count abortion deaths was being
made?
2 comments:
The wikispaces that you link to no longer exist. I know you did a lot of work on those pages. Please tell me you have backup copies.
I do have backup copies for most of them. Alas, they are not wikified so I can't go in and edit them any more. Do you need the links to anything specific in this post?
Post a Comment