Tell us how you did!
For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:
To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.
Saturday, August 09, 2008
Safe and legal? Or back alley butcher?
I'll describe several situations to you, and you decide if we're dealing with a "safe and legal" abortion provider or a criminal abortionist. And you can cheat, since I provide links. But I challenge you to just try to answer the question first, then click on the link to get more information.
Tell us how you did!
For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:
To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.
Tell us how you did!
For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:
To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
well done christina, gets the point across
1 - 4th attempt
2 - correct
3 - 3rd attempt
4 - 3rd attempt
Thanx, anon. I probably also ought to choose random women from the Cemetery of Choice and build a quiz to see if people can guess when the abortion took place, before or after Roe.
the answers are outrageous, you do well to expose these abortionists.
would you know of a way to find out about british abortion malpractice?
i put anon, but we have communicated before, i dont want to put my name to this post sorry, because of what i am going to write about.(Also if my ex sig o does happen to see my comments, he will write something pro choice. I just wanted to make you aware of that.) You once provided me with helpful info about the legality of aborting an empty gestation sac.
If you want to ask questions about cemetery of choice i think that would be a good way to engage people with the facts, and get people questioning. Probably stating the obvious here again!
Had forced abortion in 2006, was fearful ex sig o would threaten me with taking his own life again as happened in 2004 when i was pregnant and miscarried, (blighted ovum, no fetus to see, I came away with a distorted view of what miscarriage was, as i thought i had actually miscarried a baby, when there was no baby there.)
In 2006 couldnt cope with any more suicide threats, and fear of my partner because i was pregnant. Couldnt do surgical abortion, as didnt want to physically hurt my child of 9 weeks gestation, but now i know i have mentally hurt him very much. The medical staff allowed the abortion to happen. The paperwork was incorrect, it was all his reasons, not mine. I spat the pill out, and walked away, saying i couldnt go through with any of it. They coaxed me back, they said i was weak to continue with the pregnancy. ( Manipulative.) I fall into that group of women who took ru486 for the reason that it wouldnt hurt the child. We otherwise would never have considered abortion even if it put them in very dangerous situations with our partners.
There is a lot more to say, but i must stop here.
If i am honest am barely hanging on. It helps to know that there are people such as yourself.
Hugs, anon.
I'm not sure how the British civil courts work, or what entities do health inspections, etc. You might look at digging for dirt on abortionists and try to find the local equivalent of the various people to contact.
Technically it's not aborting if there's no fetus. Which isn't something you'd know from listening to abortion-lobby rhetoric. They talk as if a ban on abortion would also ban treating blighted ovum, hydatidiform mole (gestational trophoblastic disease), and incomplete miscarriages. They actually had a woman come in and testify against the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act, claiming that the Act would have prevented a doctor from starting labor after her fetus had died. Are they really that clueless, or do they do it deliberately? That's what I'd like to know.
You sound like you've really been through the wringer. Hang in there. And look around for a post-abortion group where you can get some support.
is it not insulting to peoples intelligence to testify on such grounds.
Thanks for your comments, i mean this quite sincerely.
sarah
is it not insulting to peoples intelligence to testify on such grounds.
I have not the pleasure of understanding you, Sarah. Can you elaborate?
Got the first two right, second two on second guess.
Not (cough, cough) that it was too difficult.
I got all of them correct first time around....
Sarah, hang in there. I'll keep you in my prayers...
Sorry Christina for not being clear. I guess what I meant was that the claims, (so to speak), made by the woman who testified against The Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act, surely were groundless. I guess the claims that were being made, were both clueless and deliberately inflammatory imho.
Sam - thanks very much for your comment.
Sarah
Thanx,Sarah.Gotcha!
ahhhh :)
sarah
Post a Comment