She called the clinic on December 14, and spoke to a woman who told her no nurse was available and diagnosed her feelings of morning sickness as a "neurotic reaction." On December 18 Maureen called again, again was told a nurse was not available. She reported cramping and morning sickness, and was told her symptoms were normal.
Maurine suffered sharp pains at 4 PM, after calling the clinic. She got up and fainted. She awoke cold and clammy, and tried to go for help but fainted again. A neighbor saw her and called an ambulance.
Maurine needed lifesaving surgery to address an ectopic pregnancy that the clinic had failed to diagnose.
In his defense, Robinson argued that Maureen "failed to produce even a scintilla of evidence that this defendant violated any standard of care." Robinson's operative report stated "product of conception was normal and the fetal age was 6 weeks," but the pathology report showed endometrium and chorionic villi only with no fetal parts.
Robinson contended in his deposition that the fetus was microscopic, although the normal length of 6 week embryo is 22-24 mm (just under an inch). The post-operative report from Maurine's emergency surgery found "fetal tissue fairly well preserved" in the removed segment of fallopian tube. Robinson also contended that Maureen never called him to report her symptoms, although she did call the number she was instructed to call and the clinic failed to relay her symptoms to Robinson. (Jefferson County Circuit Court Case No. CV84 460; Alabama Supreme Court No. 85-1055)
1 comment:
This is why methotrexate is a better abortifacient than RU-486. Methotrexate kills tubal pregnancies; RU-486 doesn't.
Ultrasonic diagnosis of tubal pregnancy is prone to false negatives. Yes at six weeks "normal" is visible but the range is wide, a six-week tubal pregnancy can easily be too small to visualize. There's nothing surprising or unusual about missing one, and no reflection on the sonographer's skill.
Post a Comment