Saturday, February 28, 2009

Demolishing Strongholds

This week in Scripture we've been looking at strongholds:

  • Sunday: Do not war in the flesh
  • Monday: Material or financial strongholds
  • Tuesday: Sexual strongholds
  • Wednesday: Physical strongholds
  • Thursday: Relational strongholds
  • Friday: Spiritual strongholds

    Today, we'll look at how to demolish strongholds.

    First of all, we need to go on the attack. Proverbs 21:22 says, "A wise man scales the city of the mighty And brings down the stronghold in which they trust." We aren't to just sit around waiting for things to get better. We are to go on the offensive.

    But how? Remember 2 Corinthians 10:3: "For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war according to the flesh"

    Our primary weapons are:

    Prayer -- James 5:16: The prayer of a righteous person is powerful and effective.

    Truth -- John 8:32: "You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free."

    The abortion lobby would have you believe that standing between a woman and an abortionist is some sort of bad news. But we are there to proclaim to the vulnerable woman the Good News. Remember Isaiah 61:1:

    The Spirit of the Almighty LORD is with me because the LORD has anointed me to deliver good news to humble people. He has sent me to heal those who are brokenhearted, to announce that captives will be set free and prisoners will be released.


    She is not alone. She is not abandoned. And she doesn't need to sacrifice her child.

    Now get out there and take it on.
  • 2002: Mom bleeds to death after abortion at Planned Parenthood

    Diana Lopez, age 25, was 19 weeks pregnant when she went to a Planned Parenthood for a safe and legal abortion on February 28, 2002. She was 19 weeks pregnant.

    Before the day was over, Diana had bled to death. She left two sons, 4-year-old Frankie and 2-year-old Fabian, motherless. The taxpayers of California paid for the fatal abortion, courtesy of Medi-Cal.

    After the abortion, Diana had been rushed by ambulance to County Women‘s Hospital, where a hysterectomy was performed and Diana was given five units of whole blood in a futile attempt to save her life.

    Diana‘s autopsy noted that Diana had hemorrhaged from a perforation of her cervix.

    Diana‘s husband, David, filed suit, alleging that the abortionist‘s haste caused severe lacerations that killed his wife. The suit says that Diana‘s abortion was rushed through in ony six minutes, although Planned Parenthood‘s own web site says such a procedure should take 10 to 20 minutes.

    The lawsuit also blames Planned Parenthood for proceeding with an abortion even though her hemoglobin levels were abnormally low prior to the procedure.

    The family‘s attorney also noted that in 2000, the same Planned Parenthood rushed another woman though a similar 6-minute abortion, lacerating the patient‘s cervix, rupturing her uterus, perforating her sigmoid colon and causing the loss of 2 liters of blood. Planned Parenthood also delayed three hours before transferring the patient to a hospital. Fortunately, this patient survived her ordeal.

    A review of Los Angeles County civil cases indicates that this patient was probably Kimberly Thomas, who sued on April 19, 2002, after her abortion by Joseph Marmet. Kimberly‘s suit was one of roughly 50 filed against the Los Angeles Planned Parenthood from 1983 to 2002. The medical board took no action against Marmet.

    The medical board took no action against Diana‘s abortionist, Dr. Mark Maltzer, either. However, the California Department of Health Services investigated the facility and cited Planned Parenthood for:

  • Failing to institute a necessary change in medical protocol relating to the use of laminaria (used to expand the cervix) in the dilation and evacuation procedure.
  • Lacking the evidence to show a completed assessment of the competency and credentials of the physician who carried out the abortion.
  • Inadequately advising against a potentially dangerous second-trimester D&E procedure based on low hemoglobin levels.
  • Failing to follow proper surgical abortion policy and procedure by administering Cytotec to the patient on day one of the two-day abortion procedure, when policy requires it to be administered 90 minutes before the abortion procedure.
  • Failing to inform Planned Parenthood‘s governing body of any adverse outcome related to patient care within the facility.
  • Failing to notify the Health Department of a patient's death within 24 hours of the occurrence.
  • Keeping incomplete records describing the services provided to Lopez.

    The fact that the Planned Parenthood has made "corrections" to satisfy the state does not satisfy Diana‘s family. "It was wrong. It was wrong," said Judy Lopez, Diana‘s older sister. "She was healthy. She was fine."
  • 1993: Planned Parenthood referral proves fatal

    Andrea Corey was 31 years old when she was referred by a nearby Planned Parenthood to Southern Tier Women's Services in New York for a safe and legal abortion. Andrea was sent home after her abortion, but she had retained tissue that caused an infection. She died of this infection on February 28, 1993.

    For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:



    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    1992: Little-noted abortion death

    The only information I've been able to gather on Diane Adams comes from pro-life web sites. Human Life International mentions that abortionist Angel Acevado Montalvo was charged with manslaughter in two cases of maternal deaths from safe and legal abortion. HLI also notes that after his conviction, Montalvo went right back to business doing abortions.

    Priests for Life posts a list of women who have died from legal abortions, including Diane Adams, whose date of death they give as February 28, 1992. They cite a March 5, 1992 article in the Virgin Islands Daily News. They cite one other death, that of Rosael Rodriguez, from that article.

    Rosael Rodriguez and Diane Adams are most likely the two women referred to by HLI.

    Friday, February 27, 2009

    Spiritual strongholds

    In Sunday's scripture, we looked at how to wage war spiritually against the strongholds keeping abortion practice thriving, while women suffer and their children die.

    Let's look again at 2 Corinthians 10:3, 4, 5:

    King James Bible
    For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh: (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;) Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;

    In particular, I want to look again at the word translated "strongholds" (Ochuroma a castle, stronghold, fortress, fastness; anything on which one relies, of the arguments and reasonings by which a disputant endeavours to fortify his opinion and defend it against his opponent) and the word translated "imaginations" (Logismos: a reckoning, computation; a reasoning: such as is hostile to the Christian faith; a judgment, decision: such as conscience passes).

    In this final post on different kinds of strongholds, I'd like to look at spiritual strongholds. In a nutshell, they amount to not trusting God.

    I'm gonna borrow a metric buttload of Scriptures from this page.

    And those who know your name put their trust in you, for you, O Lord, have not forsaken those who seek you. —Psalm 9:10


    Note here that we are to seek God, then trust Him to care for us. If we're out seeking our own ends, He'll leave us to our own ends. Isn't that how a lot of women pregnant when they didn't want to be ended up pregnant? By following after their hormones, or their loneliness, or their desire for earthly security, instead of seeking God?

    I'm going to emphasize something in this next one:

    Trust in the Lord, and do good;
    dwell in the land and befriend faithfulness.
    Delight yourself in the Lord,
    and he will give you the desires of your heart.

    Commit your way to the Lord;
    trust in him, and he will act.
    He will bring forth your righteousness as the light,
    and your justice as the noonday. —Psalm 37:3-6


    I can tell you from experience, this doesn't mean "Trust God and He'll act like Santa Claus and give you everything on your wish list." Trust in God, and delight in Him, and He will fill your heart with different desires. You won't want what you wanted before. He will give you new desires, desires He can fulfill. And they won't necessarily all be "holy roller" desires. You might find yourself with perfectly healthy, innocent desires for good things -- travel, nice food, friends -- that God will then fulfill. But the important thing is to let go of what you currently want -- what you currently think will make you happy -- and trust God to show you where your desires should be.

    Trust in the Lord with all your heart,
    and do not lean on your own understanding.
    In all your ways acknowledge him,
    and he will make straight your paths. —Proverbs 3:5-6


    How many times does it seem like what God plans for you is utterly insane? When I found out I was pregnant with my son, I thought it was a disaster, that it was totally the wrong time for a baby. I was utterly and completely wrong. My son became the catalyst to fix many things that were screwed up on my life. Far from a financial burden, my son became the catalyst to fix some problems and to free up money that we didn't realize we had. We went from pawning keepsakes to pay for food, to being out of debt and being able to have guests over for meals. Had I trusted in my own understanding, I'd have ended up aborting and would have stayed broke and hungry.

    You keep him in perfect peace
    whose mind is stayed on you,
    because he trusts in you.
    Trust in the Lord forever,
    for the Lord God is an everlasting rock. —Isaiah 26:3-4


    I can't count the number of times it looked as if things were a disaster, and turned out to be the gateway to blessing. Even after becoming a Christian, I've often fretted needlessly, only to see that God was steering me into something good. He just needed a 2X4 to divert me from where I was headed on my own.

    Thus says the Lord:
    “Cursed is the man who trusts in man
    and makes flesh his strength,
    whose heart turns away from the Lord.
    He is like a shrub in the desert,
    and shall not see any good come.
    He shall dwell in the parched places of the wilderness,
    in an uninhabited salt land.
    “Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord,
    whose trust is the Lord.
    He is like a tree planted by water,
    that sends out its roots by the stream,
    and does not fear when heat comes,
    for its leaves remain green,
    and is not anxious in the year of drought,
    for it does not cease to bear fruit.” -- —Jeremiah 17:5-8


    How many post abortion women are there who can certainly vouch for the first half of this Scripture? Who trusted in the abortion clinic counselors, or in other people who told them abortion was the only way? Who found that it led only to heartache and anguish and despair?

    And after he had dismissed the crowds, he went up on the mountain by himself to pray. When evening came, he was there alone, but the boat by this time was a long way from the land, beaten by the waves, for the wind was against them. And in the fourth watch of the night he came to them, walking on the sea. But when the disciples saw him walking on the sea, they were terrified, and said, “It is a ghost!” and they cried out in fear. But immediately Jesus spoke to them, saying, “Take heart; it is I. Do not be afraid.”
    And Peter answered him, “Lord, if it is you, command me to come to you on the water.” He said, “Come.” So Peter got out of the boat and walked on the water and came to Jesus. But when he saw the wind, he was afraid, and beginning to sink he cried out, “Lord, save me.” Jesus immediately reached out his hand and took hold of him, saying to him, “O you of little faith, why did you doubt?” And when they got into the boat, the wind ceased. And those in the boat worshiped him, saying, “Truly you are the Son of God.” —Matthew 14:23-33


    I have to admit, I love Peter. He's so much like me, always going off half-cocked then losing faith, getting scared, and having to have his sorry ass pulled out of trouble. Peter's problem was that he took his eyes off Jesus and looked at the storm. How often do we all need to take our eyes off the storm and turn them back on Jesus?

    At that time the disciples came to Jesus, saying, “Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?” And calling to him a child, he put him in the midst of them and said, “Truly, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. Whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven.
    “Whoever receives one such child in my name receives me, but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea. —Matthew 18:1-6


    There's a goldmine in this Scripture for an abortion blog!

    First, Jesus tells us to be like children in being humble. Children trust the adults to take care of them. And we should likewise trust in Christ.

    Then consider that Christ tells us that whoever receives a child in His name, receives Him. Can there be any clearer instruction for what to do when faced with the birth of a child? We are to welcome the child as we would welcome our Lord.

    Finally, consider the warning, "whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and be drowned in the depth of the sea." This is a profound warning to Christians who get tangled up in youth programs that take a "they're just going to do it anyway" attitude. Yes, it's especially hard for young people today to resist sexual sin, since they live in a society that practically worships sex. But we're to be in the world, not of it, and that includes a responsibility to teach youth to be in the world but not of it. We should be arming them with the tools to live virtuous lives, not making excuses for sin and even facilitating the sin by providing birth control and abortion. Doing so is damaging their souls -- something you'll be called to account for when you meet your Maker. We just read in Proverbs 3 not to trust our own understanding, but to lean on God. Ask him to grant the young people wisdom and virtue, not merely to keep them from disease and pregnancy. Is that the most we dare to hope for? Or can God deliver more?

    It's important to remember that we need to apply these Scriptures to our own struggles and strongholds, not just use them to address other people's struggles and strongholds.

    Pre-Roe, perfectly legal, not exactly safe

    "Roseanne" was in the second trimester of pregnancy when she chose safe and legal abortion in 1971. She was 37 years old, had had four children.

    She was infused with saline for the abortion. Two days later, she began vomiting and having siezures. She aspirated some of the vomit and developed pneumonia.

    The pneumonia took its toll. Roseanne died on February 27 from the pneumonia and anoxic brain damage.

    See Legal Abortion Deaths Before Roe for similar cases.

    For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:



    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    1926: Fatal Chicago abortion

    On February 27, 1926, 36-year-old Anna Welger died in her home from complications of an abortion performed that day.

    Theresa Struhala was indicted for felony murder in Anna's death. Struhala's profession is not listed.

    John Welger, whose relationship to Anna was not disclosed, was booked as an accomplice, but was later released.

    Keep in mind that things that things we take for granted, like antibiotics and blood banks, were still in the future. For more about abortion in this era, see Abortion in the 1920s.



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    Thursday, February 26, 2009

    Relational strongholds

    In Sunday's scripture, we looked at how to wage war spiritually against the strongholds keeping abortion practice thriving, while women suffer and their children die.

    Let's look again at 2 Corinthians 10:3, 4, 5:

    King James Bible
    For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh: (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;) Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;

    In particular, I want to look again at the word translated "strongholds" (Ochuroma a castle, stronghold, fortress, fastness; anything on which one relies, of the arguments and reasonings by which a disputant endeavours to fortify his opinion and defend it against his opponent) and the word translated "imaginations" (Logismos: a reckoning, computation; a reasoning: such as is hostile to the Christian faith; a judgment, decision: such as conscience passes).

    Today's strongholds, relational, relate to the sexual strongholds I discussed earlier in the week. But it's not always a sexual hold that people have on us.

    I first became aware of what really goes on in abortion mills when my babysitter, Sherri, shared with me how her mother had forced her into two unwanted abortions. Family members might threaten to withhold love and support. Doctors might use their professional clout to push for abortion. Social workers, bosses, boyfriends, and counselors may be pushing the woman. Who can withstand an assault like that? Before judging the woman resorting to abortion, think of how well you could withstand losing the love and support of people dear to you.

    Sometimes these people mean well. Sometimes they're just pushing their own agenda for their own benefit. But one constant I've seen between legal and illegal abortions is the fear of a loss of a relationship.

    Another awakening I had into how relational strongholds maintain the abortion status quo came after the election. I was crying out in pain to my social network, only to have some people I thought were friends attack me for raining on their Obamadoration. I thought how much it hurt to have these people turn on me. And I wasn't even that close to them. They were just women I'd confided in sometimes during Bible study.

    I thought of all the women who are suffering horribly after their abortions, but who continue to mouth "choice" words. I can understand why. If they stand true to what they've learned through their own horrible, agonizing experience -- that abortion is not a salve to the soul but a deep, festering wound -- they must face that agony alone, alienated from the "prochoice" friends who supported them up to the moment they awakened from the daze that allowed them to go through with the abortion. The only way to maintain any closeness to the people who matter to them, they have to maintain the bubble that those friends and family members have put up around abortion. They must see themselves as aberrations, as exceptions to the rule that abortion is a boon to womankind. If nobody near them is willing to acknowledge their suffering, they must stuff it aside and convince themselves that all is well. The baby is already dead, and there's no bringing her back. So these women must cling even more tightly to the very circle of friends that led them to the wound in the first place.

    Is it any wonder I could see the hand of Satan long before I could see the hand of God? The machinations of the Father of Lies are many, and staggering to behold. And how can one fight something so labyrinthine in it's diabolical complexity, as to manage to get the wounded women to feed those they care about into the maw of the beast under the belief that this is the only way to not be utterly, totally alone.

    When all it does is make them even more alone because they can never reveal their true selves now. They have to pretend that all is well, or risk losing what little they have.

    And then there the abortion workers. How can they leave? For to leave the business -- to admit that you'd been in the wrong, hurting women and killing children -- means making the most horrific discoveries about yourself, while facing total, abject social isolation.

    We need to have our own relationships right -- starting with our relationship with God, since if we're not right with Him we'll never really be right with anybody. And then we need to pray for and support women as they deal with the relational strongholds in their own lives that are pushing them toward abortion. And we must pray for those who promote abortion because staying in the good graces of their social group demands that they "stand for choice". And we must pray for those trapped in the abortion machine as cogs in the wheels.

    And, most of all, we must love them -- right where they are. Even when they're being as unlovable as these girls, who are cutting off all hope for troubled women.

    "Choice" is groovy -- or whatever term kids are using these days

    Pro-aborts to protest pregnancy care centers

    There's a spot in Hell for whoever is rallying those young useful idiots. If even one of those girls did her homework she'd realize she's being sent out to chant "truth" in support of a concerted effort to keep other young women as ignorant and isolated as possible for the sole benefit of the abortion lobby. She'd realize that if she wanted to stand against lies, she'd have to plant herself outside the local abortion mill, handing out leaflets with the decidedly un-hip and un-cool prolifers, referring women to the CPCs.

    I realize I need to properly identify the real Enemy -- and it's not those empty-headed girls. They no doubt think they're standing up for Women, and for Rights, and for Truth, and for Justice, and for All Manner of Groovy Things. They don't mean any harm. But they're effectively cutting off the last vestiges of hope for women who don't WANT the abortions these girls are assuming that they want.

    It's things like this that allowed me to see the hand of Satan at work long before I could see the hand of God. There has to be some sort of supernatural intelligence to turn mindless trust of The Nice People into the kind of damage these young women are doing, to their own souls as well as to the lives of the women who won't get help because they're there.

    Are youth and blind trust in the wrong people enough of an excuse for the evil that they're accomplishing with their well-meaning, bobble-headed rallying against the only hope and love being offered?

    1924: Fatal abortion and midwife's denial

    On February 26, 1924, Wanda Szidzewicz died in a Massachusetts hospital from septicemia due to an abortion performed on her on February 6 by Ida Cantor. Wanda had developed septicemia and was hospitalized on February 11..

    Testimony at Ida's trial indicated that Ida's profession was midwife, since she delivered at least one baby that Dr. Sawyer and Ida's own husband testified to.

    The jury found that Ida used improperly sterilized or non-sterile instruments in the abortion. A key part of the prosecution's case was a deathbed statement by the injured woman.

    The medical examiner found "no evidence of violence outside or in", but did find evidence that instruments had been used to perform an abortion. He also testified that Wanda had said that Ida Cantor had performed the abortion in question. A Dr. Sawyer testified that he'd told Wanda that she was dying, testimony intended to add credibility to her deathbed statement.

    A doctor from the hospital, however, testified that the death and expulsion of the fetus, along with Wanda's injuries, might have been brought about with "an accidental abortion", such as that caused by lifting a heavy box. Hospital records stated that Wanda had lifted a heavy box at some point, "four days before".

    Ida's attorney's launched a scattershot and ineffectual defense. Part of it was putting forth Ida's assertion that she she'd had to ask the police why she was being arrested -- she claimed that this proved that she'd not known anything abut Wanda's abortion or death. Her lawyer asked an expert witness if the "constant jarring operation of a sewing machine" could ahve caused Wanda to miscarry, but never introduced any evidence that Wanda had operated a sewing machine. The defense had tried to place Ida's grandchild's birth certificate into evidence as proof that she'd been at the child's birthday party in New York at the time of the abortion and thus couldn't have performed it. Ida's husband's testimony did nothing to aid her; in fact, it contradicted her.

    After her conviction, Ida appealed, but her conviction was upheld. Wanda's widower, Waclaw , also successfully sued Ida.

    When reading of abortions in this era, keep in mind that things that things we take for granted, like antibiotics and blood banks, were still in the future. For more about abortion in this era, see Abortion in the 1920s.



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    Wednesday, February 25, 2009

    Stronghold: Personal/Physical

    In Sunday's scripture, we looked at how to wage war spiritually against the strongholds keeping abortion practice thriving, while women suffer and their children die.

    Let's look again at 2 Corinthians 10:3, 4, 5:

    King James Bible
    For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh: (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;) Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;

    In particular, I want to look again at the word translated "strongholds" (Ochuroma a castle, stronghold, fortress, fastness; anything on which one relies, of the arguments and reasonings by which a disputant endeavours to fortify his opinion and defend it against his opponent) and the word translated "imaginations" (Logismos: a reckoning, computation; a reasoning: such as is hostile to the Christian faith; a judgment, decision: such as conscience passes).

    Think of a stronghold as an entrenched idea that is holding the person prisoner. Today's stronghold is the personal/physical. And in this case, the stronghold is the idea that we "own" our bodies.

    Much of the modern resistance to chastity comes from men's belief that they 'own' their bodies—those vast and perilous estates, pulsating with the energy that made the worlds, in which they find themselves without their consent and from which they are ejected at the pleasure of Another! -- C. S. Lewis, "The Screwtape Letters"


    Think about it -- how much control do you really have over your body? It goes about its business -- metabolizing, bringing in oxygen and putting out carbon dioxide -- without any input from you whatsoever. Did you choose your sex? Your height? Whether you have a light frame or a heavy one? Whether you have a fast or slow metabolism? You couldn't halt the process of maturation, and you can't stop the process of aging. And you can't avoid death. The more you know about what goes on in your body, the more you realize that you're just a tenant in a vast estate that operates with very little of your say-so.

    Sure, you could kill your body with a bullet to the brain or enough carbon monixide. You can tend it in ways that make it healthier or less healthy. But really, you have very little control at all. And if you're pregnant when you didn't intend to be, you're faced with proof that your body produced and released an ova without your say-so, and somebody else's body cranked out a load of sperm without his say-so.

    You might rail against this powerlessness by destroying the fruit of that union, but in doing so, you're in a way admitting how little control you really have.

    You're a tenant, like it or not. A steward. You have a lot of control over what you do with your body -- whether you use it for good or evil, or whether you sit around like a slug and do nothing. But ultimately you're responsible to the Maker of that body for what you did with it.

    40 Days for Life Prayer of the Day

    Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations. -- Matthew 28:19

    Heavenly Father, thank You for this opportunity to join my prayers and fasting with those throughout our country for the end of legalized abortion in America. Have mercy on us all for any time that we have not stood up for life in the past.

    Dear Jesus, I pray for those who are in vigil outside abortion clinics in over 130 cities throughout our nation during this 40 Days for Life. Give them the right words and the right presentation to change the hearts of pregnant girls and women that they will not go through with their planned abortion.

    Come Holy Spirit; renew our nation. Help us with our community outreach so that we might educate and touch the hearts of the apathetic and the pro-choice through our prayers, fasting, and constant vigil. Convert President Obama to our pro-life cause.

    1916: Conflicting evidence in abortion death

    Lillian Hobbs was convicted of murder in the 1916 abortion death of 21-year-old Alda Christopherson. The testimony of John K. McDonald, who was granted immunity in exchange, was crucial in the case. He was the father of Alda's aborted baby.

    Depending on whose testimony you believe, the whole sordid story began either on February 21, or six weeks earlier.

    All the testimony agreed that Alda's lover, John McDonald, had visited Hobbs' office on Monday, February 21, asking if Alda had been there. Testimony agreed that Hobbs denied having seen Alda, even though the girl had indeed been there. Testimony agreed that McDonald had made arrangements for an abortion for Alda, after first inquiring if the procedure would be safe. He had been planning to marry the girl, and although the pregnancy was "an inconvenience" he wasn't willing to pursue an abortion if it would endanger Alda. All the testimony agreed that Hobbs had assured McDonald that as long as Alda followed instructions, an abortion would be perfectly safe.

    But Hobbs testified in her trial that when Alda had arrived earlier, she'd admitted to having "taken dope" for six weeks to try to cause an abortion. She also claimed that Alda had admitted to having used a buttonhook on herself the previous Sunday. (It is unclear if she meant the day before, February 20, or the Sunday before that.)

    Hobbs, along with her son, William Heyward, and her nurse, Ada Kanter, testified that upon her arrival on the 21st, Alda was very ill, walking slowly and as if in great pain. They all also testified that Alda had spoken of taking dope and trying to self-abort with a buttonhook, and that Hobbs had advised Alda to go to a hospital.

    Hobbs also testified that she'd instructed Alda to go home, take some quinine and a hot bath, and gave her permission to return the next day.

    A five-and-dime clerk, Lillian Thompson, testified that Alda had come to the store at about 10 a.m. on the 21st to buy sanitary napkins. Thompson testified that when she'd asked Alda what her trouble was -- because Alda seemed to be very ill and in great pain -- Alda ha pointed to a buttonhook on the counter and said she'd used a buttonhook and a crochet hook on herself and was going to see a doctor about it. However, Thompson's employer testified that the clerk's "reputation for truth and veracity was bad."

    Whatever Alda's condition on the 21st -- and whatever Hobbs' reason for concealing from McDonald that his lover was supposedly deathly ill and in need of hospitalization when he'd arrived on Tuesday, the 22nd, to arrange an abortion -- McDonald met Alda at about 1:30 that afternoon and brought her to Hobbs' office.

    McDonald testified that Alda had been in good health when he'd brought her for the abortion, and that though both he and Alda had been worried, Hobbs had reassured the couple that the girl would be fine as long as she followed instructions.

    Here, again, the testimony all agrees. The couple arrived shortly before 2 p.m., entering through the first floor reception area. Alda was sent by the front way down to the basement, while Hobbs went down the back way.

    Hobbs testified that during the time she'd been in the basement with Alda, she'd merely examined her to determine how much damage the girl had done with the buttonhook. She said she'd found some oozing blood and signs of great inflammation. She said that she swabbed Alda with antiseptic on a bit of gauze, using small dressing forceps.

    Hobbs' daughter-in-law and husband, George, both testified that Alda seemed very sick and miserable. Mr. Hobbs said that Alda was moaning and crying. The daughter-in-law said that Alda was pale and walking slowly, as if in great pain, and asked Hobbs to see how much damage the buttonhook had done.

    The daughter-in-law also testified that Hobbs called her in to the exam room. Alda was hysterical, weeping and crying aloud, "Oh, my! If I hadn't used the buttonhook I would not have to be here!"

    All testimony agreed that Hobbs had returned within about 15 minutes to the reception area to speak with McDonald, and that the result of the consultation was McDonald giving her $50.

    McDonald said that Hobbs had come to get her fee for the abortion. Hobbs said she'd collected money to admit Alda to the hospital. She said she phoned American Theatrical Hospital and arranged to admit Alda.

    Nobody testified about whether or not American Theatrical Hospital ever got a call from Hobbs to admit a patient. What everybody did testify to is that McDonald and Alda left Hobbs' office, with Hobbs insisting that Alda was wretchedly ill, and McDonald testifying that she seemed fine.

    McDonald sent Alda home by streetcar, to the home of Mrs. G.E. Holmes, where Alda was the housekeeper. Later that evening he went to pick her up for a date. He testified that she seemed well. Her sister, Kitty, noted that Alda seemed to be in good health when McDonald picked her up, as well as later when Kitty joined the couple at the picture show. Their other sister, Nellie, also testified that Alda seemed to be in good health late on the 22nd.

    But at about 2:30 on the morning of Wednesday, the 23rd, Alda took ill, with vomiting, cramps, and chills. She improved somewhat over the course of the day, but kept to her bed. Hobbs claimed that McDonald came to her practice at about 2 p.m that day to tell her that Alda was well, prompting her to cancel plans to admit the girl to the hospital.

    On Thursday, February 24, somebody summoned Dr. Barnsbach at around 9 a.m. He found Alda collapsed, and, based on what little information he'd been given, he diagnosed ptomaine poisoning and had her removed to Lakeside Hospital. As she was being taken from the house, Hobbs arrived and inquired after the girl. When told that Alda was being taken to the hospital for ptomaine poisoning, she did not mention anything to the attending physician about any abortion, or abortion infection -- a grave omission, regardless of whether she or Alda had performed the abortion in question, and showing little regard for her patient's well-being.

    It was Alda's sister Kitty who told told physicians at the hospital the true cause of Alda's sickness. She had learned the truth when she'd called McDonald to tell him of Alda's collapse. Dr. A. R. Johnson performed surgery on Alda. He found her abdomen full of blood and blood clots, an enlarged uterus consistent with 2 to 2 1/2 months of pregnancy, and placental tissue protruding through a large hole in the top of her uterus. He cleaned up the mess in Alda's abdominal cavity and sutured the hole in her uterus. Johnson later testified that a buttonhook can not have done that much damage. The hole, Johnson insisted, must have been made by a much larger instrument, capable of being spread open.

    Despite Dr. Johnson's efforts, and no thanks to Dr. Hobbs, Alda died on the 25th. During the post-mortem, her uterus was removed and preserved, to be presented as evidence in the trial. Three other doctors, called as expert witnesses, had examined the uterus after Alda's death and said that a buttonhook could possibly have caused the damage, and estimated that the way the edges of the hole were soughing, the injury had to have occurred prior to Alda's visit to Hobbs' practice to have caused such extensive infection.

    The jury evidently decided that Hobbs' story didn't hold together well, for they voted to convict her of murder in Alda's death. Hobbs was sentenced to 14 years in prison.

    Between the death and the trial, Hobbs had been indicted for the abortion death of Ellen Mastson. Ellen died in early November of 1917.

    Hobbs appealed on multiple grounds, including the fairly feeble one that only on court documents, she was referred to once as "Lillian Hobbs otherwise Lillian Seymour", but elsewhere on court documents only as "the said Lillian Hobbs". She also protested that it was inappropriate to bring up the death of Ellen Matson as evidence of her practice as a criminal abortionist, since Ellen died nearly two years after Alda's death and thus her abortion wasn't evidence of prior criminal behavior. She also protested that it would have been sufficient to show evidence that she had performed an abortion Ellen, that introducing the reality of Ellen's death was prejudicial.

    The appeal succeeded. The conviction was overturned and a new trial ordered. However, Hobbs' conviction and sentencing for Ellen Matson's death rendered this rather a moot point.

    Hobbs was also implicated, but never tried, for the 1917 abortion death of Ruth Lemaire.

    These fatal abortions were typical of pre-legalization abortions in that they were performed by a physician.

    Note, please, that with issues such as doctors not using proper aseptic techniques, lack of access to blood transfusions and antibiotics, and overall poor health to begin with, there was likely little difference between the performance of a legal abortion and illegal practice, and the aftercare for either type of abortion was probably equally unlikely to do the woman much, if any, good. For more information about early 20th Century abortion mortality, see Abortion Deaths 1910-1919.

    And lest you think the sorts of things that happened in Alda's death stopped happening with legalization, consider:

  • When Evelyn Dudley collapsed in the driveway of her home, her safe and legal abortionist tried to claim he'd only been treating her for injuries she'd sustained elsewhere.

  • When Alicia Hannah was caught trying to dump the body of Angela Sanchez in 1993, she claimed Angela had collapsed at her clinic after having an illegal abortion elsewhere.

  • Abortionist Andre Neharoayoff failed to hospitalize "Ellen" Roe, and sent her home with a fetal leg protruding from her uterus, in 1983.

  • Abortionist Suresh Gandotra delayed hospitalizing Magdalena Rodriguez in 1994, sending her to the hospital with the mangled fetus protruding from a tear in her uterus.

    Quackery, it seems, is truly timeless.

    For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:



    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.
  • 1879: The body in the trunk

    In the late winter of 1879, Jennie P. Clark's body was found stuffed into a trunk in a river at Lynn, New York. An investigation pieced together how she ended up there.

    On February 12, Jennie left her home in the Highlands. She was seen shortly thereafter going into the Boston home of Dr. C. C. Goodrich, which she leased from Dr. James L. Simons, who passed himself off as a dentist but was actually the owner of several abortion mills. The abortion was evidently performed at Goodrich's practice. Jennie left on February 15 and went to the home where the an unnamed mother and daughter cared for her. Jennie delivered her dead fetus and seemed to be on the mend. She took a sudden turn for the worse and died on February 25. Dr. Kimball, who lived in the same house as Jennie, as well as Dr. Goodrich were informed when Jennie's health started deteriorating, but they didn't arrive until after her death on February 25.

    They packed up the body into the trunk, with Goodrich for some reason removing the dead girl's nose with dental forceps. The next evening, Kimball brought the trunk to Lynn and looked for someplace to dump it. Most of the streams were frozen. He finally tossed it off the Foxbill Bridge into the Saugus River.

    Dr. C. C. Goodrich was arrested as the abortionist. Dr. Kimball was arrested as an accessory. Mr. Altin M. Adams, at whose house Jennie worked, was arrested as secondary accessory, as were the mother and daughter living in the house where Jennie had died.

    I have no information on overall maternal mortality, or abortion mortality, in the 19th century. I imagine it can't be too much different from maternal and abortion mortality at the very beginning of the 20th Century.

    Note, please, that with issues such as doctors not using proper aseptic techniques, lack of access to blood transfusions and antibiotics, and overall poor health to begin with, there was likely little difference between the performance of a legal abortion and illegal practice, and the aftercare for either type of abortion was probably equally unlikely to do the woman much, if any, good.

    For more on this era, see Abortion Deaths in the 19th Century.

    Lest you think dumping the body disappeared with legalization, read the story of Angela Sanchez. Her family found her abortionist and an accomplice trying to stuff Angela's stiffening body into the trunk of her own car, which they'd planed to ditch. And this was in 1993 -- more than a hundred years after an abortionist and her accomplices stuffed Jennie Clark's body into a trunk.

    You can't change what abortion is or the type of people it's going to attract to the business.

    For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:



    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    Tuesday, February 24, 2009

    Addictive strongholds: Sexuality

    In Sunday's scripture, we looked at how to wage war spiritually against the strongholds keeping abortion practice thriving, while women suffer and their children die.

    Today we'll look at another area that is allowing abortion, not families, to thrive: habitual or addictive strongholds.

    Let's look again at 2 Corinthians 10:3, 4, 5:

    King James Bible
    For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh: (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;) Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;

    In particular, I want to look again at the word translated "strongholds" (Ochuroma a castle, stronghold, fortress, fastness; anything on which one relies, of the arguments and reasonings by which a disputant endeavours to fortify his opinion and defend it against his opponent) and the word translated "imaginations" (Logismos: a reckoning, computation; a reasoning: such as is hostile to the Christian faith; a judgment, decision: such as conscience passes).

    Think of a stronghold as an entrenched idea that is holding the person prisoner. And we know how addiction to drugs or alcohol can keep a person prisoner. And the idea of a sex addiction has been creeping into people's awareness. I'd like to look at this idea of sexual addiction a bit.

    An addiction, by definition, can never satisfy; it only drives the person for more of the thing he or she is addicted to.

    I'll go to one of the blog posts that brings my blogs the most page views: How to induce a miscarriage herbally (and safely). If you read the comments there, you don't get a picture of women leading rich, satisfying lives:

    I am almost 44 and going through a divorce and custody battle over 2 little girls. In a flash with a man I conceived (I think he sneezed in my direction) and cannot believe I am going through this at my age!


    We all know you don't get pregnant from getting sneezed on. This woman had sex with a man she had so little relationship with that she described the act as him sneezing in her direction.

    I was at a friends party on the 16 june and i passed out waking up to my friends asking me if i remebered last nigh. Well apparently I had sex with someone and he said he does not remember if he wore a condom...and i dont even remeber at all.....so yeah I am married and stationed overseas with my husband who i love to death and i cant tell him this....


    Getting drunk until you pass out and being raped while unconscious.

    my ex-boyfriend is abusive and i refuse to carry his child simply b/c i will be stuck with him 4 the rest of my life! i already have a daughter and i never want to give him the chance to start hitting her. so im not having this DAMN BABY!


    Sucked into a relationship with an abusive man, to the point where she's still having sex with him even though he's hurting her and a threat to her daughter.

    But i havent taken a pregnancy test because i live with my boyfriend and he keeps a close eye on me. He is very abusive and controling and i lack going anywhere outside of the yard.


    Another woman stuck in an abusive relationship.

    I shouldn't have had sex if I didn't want to get preggers, but there you go and here I am!


    Her biological drives overrode the thinking, choosing part of her and she ended up pregnant when she didn't want to be.

    Here we have a man chiming in on behalf of another sad woman:

    Ive been seeing a very nice lady and ofc have had sex. She is getting her 3rd divorce and all of them have been abusive :( . She already has 6 children and dont need another one while she is going through her divorce. Im divorced with 3 children and a grandson of my own.


    A woman who seems to be addicted to relationships with bad men.

    I am in a very stressed relatioship with one child and I recently found out i was pregnant. I don't want to have anther child. Before I could explain this to my boyfriend, he told everyone. I feel stuck. I don't want everyone to know that I had an abortion so I deceided to use the vitamin C at first then I incorparated Dong Quai but stopped only after two doses. I found this website and I feel encouraged. I have continued the Vitamin C and just started the parsley insert and will drink the infusion soon. Please pary for me and my family. I am a student in college and workk full time. I don't spend enough time with my first child.


    Again, sex in what she knows is an untenable situation. She knows it will lead to heartache. But she can't see living without the sex so she copes again and again with the consequences.

    And this is just one site. Read prochoice sites and you will see the common thread of women in miserable, unsatisfying relationships, or no relationships at all, but they're unable to hold back from submitting sexually to their urges. They're trapped in a relentless cycle of sex that brings no intimacy, only panic and stress, increased risk of STDs and the long-range risks of these (including cancer and death), pregnancy scares and pregnancies they don't feel they can cope with.

    The picture is even more bleak if you go behind the doors of an abortion clinic. I listened to the lamentations of abortion clinic nurses who were unable to help their patients abstain from sex while healing from their abortions. These patients were in "relationships" -- I hate to dignify their situations by using such a word -- with men who would not tolerate abstaining from sex while the women recovered. Not taking "no" for an answer when seeking sex from a woman has a name: RAPE. These women were submitting to unwanted sex -- unprotected sex, since the men in question refused to wear condoms -- regularly and frequently. Men who were walking petri dishes of STDs, since they were also having unprotected intercourse with other women. And it never occurred to the nurses caring for these women -- and I believe the nurses really did care -- to refer to rape crisis, to a battered women's shelter, to in any way suggest that these women deserved better in their lives.

    Which shows how the sexual addiction stronghold is a societal one as well as a personal one. Our society teaches in a thousand ways, some subtle and some blatant, that you are nobody unless somebody's screwing you. Better a dissatisfying, shallow, pointless sexual encounter -- one that leaves you emotionally damaged, infected with an incurable disease, and pregnant with no supportive partner -- than no sexual encounter at all. We live in a society where the greatest compliment you can pay a person is not to say that he or she is strong, diligent, virtuous, patient, pleasant, prudent, or anything else of any actual value. The greatest complement is to say somebody is "hot" -- that their very presence incites lust. Is it any wonder that even believers have sexual addiction strongholds in their personal lives?

    If we step back, we can see the handiwork of the Father of Lies. Satan teaches that sexual licentiousness is "healthy" -- when even a cursory glance reveals a world of STDs. Satan teaches that it is possible -- nay, even desirable -- to totally divorce sexuality from procreation and pair bonding. But it's the very idea that sex and procreation can be separated that leads to problems with side effects from contraceptives, and to unintended pregnancies -- which have increased, not decreased, since the contraceptive culture has become entrenched in society. Satan teaches that sexual restraint is impossible -- yet everybody at some point practices it. Those reading this blog are not indulging their sexual appetites at the moment. It's possible to live a lifetime of moments in which the sexual appetites are put aside and more appropriate urges satisfied -- the desire to eat, sleep, learn, play, accomplish, and love.

    Until we battle spiritually with the strongholds of sexual addiction in society and in our own lives, we will continue to see broken hearts and broken bodies. We need to first of all be removing these strongholds in our own lives. Are we using sex to try to fill a void that it simply can't fill? Or are we being chaste, whether married or single? (For to be chaste is not to be celibate -- to be chaste is to put sexuality in its proper context, which is different for a single person than for a married person.) Are we teaching those in our churches how to be chaste? Are we building a society that values people for something other than that they incite lust?

    Then, having removed the beams from our own eyes, we need to frequently and do spiritual battle against these societal strongholds through prayer. Develop the habit of praying when presented with the omnipresent signs of sexual strongholds in our society.

    1993: NAF abortion leaves woman in fatal coma

    On February 24, 1993, 23-year-old Venus Ortiz sought a safe, legal abortion at National Abortion Federation member Eastern Women's Center.



    Evidence indicated that the abortion of Venus' approximately 15-week pregnancy was performed by a Dr. Leiber. Venus' family later alleged that there was negligence in administering anesthesia to her, and failure to establish an airway. Brevital, fentanyl, and midazolam were administered in dosages and manners contrary to standards of practice, causing Venus to suffer a synergistic reaction.

    Eastern's staff failed to promptly diagnose and attend to cardio-pulmonary arrest. Eastern's notes of 5:35 PM indicate "2:35 PM end of surgery ... we noticed patient's ashen color and the pulse oximeter tracing and digital readout were gone from the monitor." Emergency medical services were called. The reading of Venus' blood pressure at that time was 90/55; four minutes later it was recorded as being 146/62.

    Venus was transported by ambulance to a hospital, accompanied by Dr. Cyrus, Dr. Goodman, and/or Dr. Jeffrey P. Moskowitz. However, the damage had already been done. Venus was left in permanent need of respirator, with profound brain damage. Venus remains in a coma/vegetative state. She was hospitalized a little over five months before being transferred to permanent nursing home care.

    To further underscore Eastern's neglect of patients' needs, the suit also noted that although this was her 4th abortion, Venus had not been referred to a social worker.

    Venus remained in a permanent vegetative state for the remainder of her life. She died in New York on December 16, 1998 at the age of 29.

    Two other patients, Dawn Ravenelle and Dawn Mack, also died of complications of abortions done at Eastern Women's Center.

    For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:



    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    Monday, February 23, 2009

    Searches: Deaths and more

  • Abortion deaths: For all the ones I know about, check out the Cemetery of Choice. If you're looking for something more specific I have the safe-n-legal deaths, anesthesia deaths, embolism deaths, septic abortion deaths, and hemorrhage deaths. I have women who died under the tender ministrations of the National Abortion Federation, or of Planned Parenthood. I have teens killed by abortion. If you're looking by time period, I have The 19th Century, 1900-1909, 1910-1919, the 1920's, the 1930's, the 1940's, the 1950's, the 1960's, the 1970's, the 1980's, the 1990's, and since 2000. If there's any other category of abortion death you're interested in, let me know.

  • Rosie Jimenez (pictured): The woman who died because the abortion lobby needed a corpse. The seventeen women who died from safe, legal abortions in 1977 died umourned by the abortion lobby. They were examples of "all surgery has risks" -- even Barbaralee Davis, who died because a member of the newly-founded National Abortion Federation sent her home with the face and spine of her unborn baby jammed into a tear in her uterus -- and thus not worth getting upset about.

  • Abortion videos: I have a collection here.

  • Clinic abortions no safer than back alley: Well, statistically, legalization had no visible impact on abortion mortality. And I know of three erstwhile criminal abortionists who waited until after legalization to start killing patients: Milan Vuitch (pictured), Jesse Ketchum, and Benjamin Munson.

  • Dr. Anthony J Lund: is one of the pervert abortionists featured in this post.

  • Life of the mother abortions: are an obsolete concept. They should have gone the way of leaching and using whiskey for anesthesia after the c-section became safe.

  • Self-induced abortion: I have information gathered here. Don't try this at home!

  • Belkis Gonzales (pictured): is the Florida abortion clinic owner in trouble for reportedly putting a live-born baby girl in a biohazard bag and tossing her onto the roof to hide the body from police.

  • Abortion songs: I have a collection here, complete with videos. A real cheery batch of ditties. Ain't abortion grand?

  • Seth Gilbertson: is one of the people who was either suckered in by the Planned Parenthood "monster CPC" hoax, or was in on it. He even added a comment when he signed their petition: "Every woman should have the ability to recieve balanced information so they can make their own decisions." Which would mean that they should speak to somebody who isn't part of Planned Parenthood.

  • Marla Cardamone (pictured): was browbeaten into an unwanted abortion by a hospital social worker. She died along with her baby.

  • Nicholas Braemer: One of the quack abortionists who worked at the seedy Clinica Medica Para la Mujer De Hoy.

  • Lysol douches: were evidently once considered healthful. Which might explain some of the "lysol abortion" stories.

  • Rapin Osathanondh: is the guy who had a hand-holder assisting in general anesthesia on Laura Hope Smith (pictured), with fatal results. Her mother, Eileen Smith, has become an outspoken proponent of the church taking a more active role in preventing abortions.

  • Nabil Ghali: The only one I know about is a pervy quack of an abortionist, whereabouts currently unknown.
  • Pulling down material or financial strongholds

    In yesterday's scripture, we looked at how to wage war spiritually against the strongholds keeping abortion practice thriving, while women suffer and their children die.

    Today we'll look at one stronghold that is allowing abortion, not families, to thrive: material or financial concerns.

    Let's look again at 2 Corinthians 10:3, 4, 5:

    King James Bible
    For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh: (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;) Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;

    In particular, I want to look again at the word translated "strongholds" (Ochuroma a castle, stronghold, fortress, fastness; anything on which one relies, of the arguments and reasonings by which a disputant endeavours to fortify his opinion and defend it against his opponent) and the word translated "imaginations" (Logismos: a reckoning, computation; a reasoning: such as is hostile to the Christian faith; a judgment, decision: such as conscience passes).

    Think of a stronghold as an entrenched idea that is holding the person prisoner.

    How many of us are held prisoner by the idea that we don't have enough money, or enough of the stuff money buys, to accomplish what we need to accomplish?

    The woman feeling driven to abortion might be trapped by a material stronghold.

    It may be very concrete, in that she is lacking in basic necessities for her family because she is not tapped into God's provision. We can help her in concrete ways, by providing necessities, but we can also help her by praying for and with her that she move forward in faith, not in fear. If she is a believer, she might learn that tithing is a powerful weapon against material strongholds. In worldly calculations, it makes no sense for somebody who is already struggling to make ends meet to take a tenth of their income off the top and give it away, but remember we are not battling a worldly war. Our battle is also metaphysical. Taking the leap of faith -- putting ten percent in the offering plate when money is already tight -- turns your finances into a powerful weapon against Satan, rather than a foothold for him in your life.

    Other material obstacles are not readily visible to outsiders. But remember that we're fighting "imaginations" as well as "strongholds". The woman who looks well-off to us might still feel just as trapped by material constraints. Watch "Dr. Phil" often enough and you'll see guests living in lavish houses, driving new cars, owning boats, who are in debt beyond the point where it looks they can ever escape. They are trapped in the stronghold of belief that material goods are the path to happiness. One need not be trapped in debt to be trapped in thinking that material goods are the path to happiness. For these women, prayer is our strongest weapon -- but we need also to be living lives that find joy in relationships, with God and with others, as examples to follow. We can encourage these women to restructure their lives in ways that are not dependent upon owning expensive, prestigious items in order to try to be happy and satisfied. And, again, if these women are women of faith they will find tithing to be a powerful weapon.

    And for any woman feeling trapped, turning her back on the abortion table can be a turning point in the war over strongholds in her life. To commit to welcoming the child, whatever her circumstances, she is beating back the attacks of Satan, who is attempting to drive her away from trust in God and into fear and reliance on self. Stand on Philippians 4:13: I can do all things through He Who strengthens me.

    And what of us? We might have material or financial strongholds in our own lives. We might be holding back a hand of material assistance to others because we fear there will not be enough left for ourselves. We might be holding back from reaching out as organizations because we don't have enough money. As if God is broke and can't provide for His children! If the task before us is set out by God, then He will provide the means. I recommend reading about the lives of faithful believers such as Corrie ten Boom, who always found God's provision sufficient, in order to break strongholds. For individual believers, again, tithing is a weapon. For organizations, prayer and stepping out in faith.

    1944: Abortionist pulls stupid crook trick

    On February 14, 1944, Amelia Cardito, 34-year-old mother of 4, underwent an illegal abortion at the office of Dr. Anthony Renda. Amelia died nine days later in a New York hospital.

    Renda, author of three books on obstetrics, may have been a smart doctor, but he was a stupid crook. He implicated himself when he called police to complain that Amelia's widower was shaking him down for funeral expenses.

    Renda was sentenced to 7 years in Sing-Sing for Amelia's death.

    Amelia's abortion was typical of pre-legalization abortions in that it was performed by a physician.

    During the 1940s, while abortion was still illegal, there was a massive drop in maternal mortality from abortion. The death toll fell from 1,407 in 1940, to 744 in 1945, to 263 in 1950. Most researches attribute this plunge to the development of blood transfusion techniques and the introduction of antibiotics. Learn more here.



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    1929: Mystery abortion fatal for Chicago woman

    On February 23, 1928, 26-year-old Miss Martha Washington died in Chicago from an illegal abortion. The person or persons responsible were never identified or prosecuted.

    Keep in mind that things that things we take for granted, like antibiotics and blood banks, were still in the future. For more about abortion in this era, see Abortion in the 1920s.



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    Sunday, February 22, 2009

    2 Corinthians 10: 3-5 -- Do not war in the flesh

    2 Corinthians 10:3, 4, 5

    New American Standard Bible (©1995)
    For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war according to the flesh, for the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh, but divinely powerful for the destruction of fortresses. We are destroying speculations and every lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God, and we are taking every thought captive to the obedience of Christ,

    GOD'S WORD® Translation (©1995)
    Of course we are human, but we don't fight like humans. The weapons we use in our fight are not made by humans. Rather, they are powerful weapons from God. With them we destroy people's defenses, that is, their arguments and all their intellectual arrogance that oppose the knowledge of God. We take every thought captive so that it is obedient to Christ.

    King James Bible
    For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh: (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;) Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;

    American Standard Version
    For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war according to the flesh (for the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh, but mighty before God to the casting down of strongholds), casting down imaginations, and every high thing that is exalted against the knowledge of God, and bringing every thought into captivity to the obedience of Christ;

    Bible in Basic English
    For though we may be living in the flesh, we are not fighting after the way of the flesh (For the arms with which we are fighting are not those of the flesh, but are strong before God for the destruction of high places); Putting an end to reasonings, and every high thing which is lifted up against the knowledge of God, and causing every thought to come under the authority of Christ;

    Young's Literal Translation
    for walking in the flesh, not according to the flesh do we war, for the weapons of our warfare are not fleshly, but powerful to God for bringing down of strongholds, reasonings bringing down, and every high thing lifted up against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of the Christ,


    There's a lot of meat in there, way too much for simply one post, so I'll latch on to two things:

    The theme of the sermon preached at church today and look at the word translated "strongholds" -- Ochuroma: a castle, stronghold, fortress, fastness; anything on which one relies, of the arguments and reasonings by which a disputant endeavours to fortify his opinion and defend it against his opponent

    The word translated "imaginations" -- Logismos: a reckoning, computation; a reasoning: such as is hostile to the Christian faith; a judgment, decision: such as conscience passes

    We can take some steps to curtail the practice of abortion with worldly means -- passing laws and Constitutional amendments, offering help to abortion-vulnerable women. But to defeat it we must rely upon spiritual means, on attacking the strongholds that allow the practice to thrive as it does.

    The most obvious strongholds are the lies about the unborn -- all of which we're familiar with. But there are also strongholds regarding abortion-vulnerable women. And it is there where both sides have strongholds.

    The supporter of abortion often does so out of certain beliefs about abortion and the women submitting to abortion. I will name just a few:

  • That abortion is palliative; it helps women
  • That women undergo abortions because they are freely choosing to do so
  • That once pregnant, women neither need nor want help avoiding abortion
  • That once the idea of abortion is fixed on, nothing can dissuade or discourage the woman from following through
  • That the fact that the idea of abortion is fixed on means that abortion truly is in the woman's best interests

    But prolifers likewise have certain false beliefs -- strongholds -- about women submitting to abortion. Again, I will name just a few:

  • That they know they're killing babies
  • That they either hate their babies, or are too indifferent to even hate them
  • That their reasons for undergoing abortion are feeble, selfish, and mean-spirited
  • That they're promiscuous

    There are also false beliefs both hold about abortion practice before and after legalization, the impact of laws and regulations on abortion practice, and so on.

    In order to have spiritual power to bring down strongholds and false beliefs among "the other side", we must first address the strongholds and false beliefs among ourselves. One of the false beliefs my work has broken is the belief that before Roe, quack abortionists who killed their patients were promptly and effectively locked away. Researching the work of abortionists like Lucy Hagenow tore down that stronghold.

    Destroying such strongholds in ourselves have not just material applications -- helping us, for example, to draft more effective laws next time. They have spiritual applications. When we believe a lie, we give The Father of Lies a foothold. Taking away those footholds puts us in a better place to do battle spiritually.
  • 1991: Woman attributes chest pain to abortion, dies of heart attack

    Shirley Hollis, a 30-year-old mother of two, had an abortion performed by Bruce Lucero on February 22, 1991.

    Shortly after she went home, she was short of breath, had pain in her arms, and was vomiting. Her boyfriend called the clinic and was told to bring her to the emergency room. (I give great credit to them for doing this; it's far more typical for the clinic to be the ones reassuring the patient that the symptoms are normal and not to seek care.)

    Shirley wanted to wait, thinking the symptoms were related to the abortion and would go away on their own. Shortly afterward, she had a heart attack, and her boyfriend called 911 and started CPR. The ambulance took Shirley to the hospital, where she died.

    The autopsy found that Shirley had severe coronary artery disease, which had never been diagnosed. Shirley's mother faulted Lucero with Shirley's death because he failed to detect her heart problem when he examined her at the abortion facility.

    Although the abortion did not directly cause Shirley's death, I list her as an abortion death because her belief that the abortion was causing her symptoms led her to delay seeking appropriate medical care. The abortion might also have demoralized her into not caring enough to seek help for her symptoms. I would very much like to see a study to see if, just as women are more prone to violent death after abortion, they are also more prone to die of medical conditions that they allow to go untreated due to post-abortion mental health or drug and alcohol issues.

    For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:



    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    1983: Doctor-recommended abortion kills teen

    Barbara Hoppert was a sixteen-year-old high school sophomore when she checked into Loma Linda University Hospital for an abortion. She was in the second trimester of her pregnancy. She was having the abortion on the recommendation of her physician, because of a congenital heart condition.

    The abortion was performed on February 22, 1983.

    During the procedure, Barbara's heart stopped. Physicians were unable to revive her, and she was pronounced dead on the operating table.

    The following comment was posted on the RealChoice blog:

    It's been almost 24 years since I was at the Loma Linda Hospital and was roomed with Barbara Hoppert, but not year goes by when Feb 22nd rolls around and I don't think of her. She died that day during her abortion procedure. I just now put her name into google and found your article on her. It was barely 4 sentences and seemed as cold as her death. She was once alive and had such a sad end and dramatic story. It still brings me to tears today thinking about her last night alive... how she was treated by her own family and the staff at the hospital. We watched Square Pegs that night on tv. And she told me about the boy who had impregnated her... She left early the next morning and I wished her good luck... An hour later a woman came to the room, later I found out that was her "real" mother whom Barbara thought was her sister. She missed seeing Barbara that one last time.... Barbara's story is very tragic. I am so very sad that she was so alone her last night alive. I was her only comfort and I was a complete stranger. Don't know how comforting I was other than I cried with her and listened.... Knowing the pain she was in.... She remains in my prayers. Just thought you should know she was more than just part of your cause.


    Thanks to the woman who came forward to share this memory of Barbara.

    Barbara's was not the only tragic death caused by doctors who recommended (or excused) abortion as a life-saving or health-preserving option for the mother:
    • Allegra Roseberry was pushed into an abortion in order to obtain experimental cancer treatment.
    • Anjelica Duarte sought an abortion on the advice of her physician, and ended up dying under the care of a quack.
    • Christin Gilbert died after an abortion George Tiller holds was justified on grounds of maternal health.
    • Erika Peterson died in 1961 when her doctors obtained her husband's permission to perform a "therapeutic" abortion.
    • "Molly" Roe died in 1975 when her doctors made the dubious decision to perform a saline abortion to improve her chances of surviving a lupus crisis.


    For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:



    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    Saturday, February 21, 2009

    Which is more invasive?

    Annapolis tattoo debate turns into abortion clash

    Seems the Republicans in Annapolis leaped on the chance to stick an amendment onto a bill that would have required parental consent for tattoos -- an amendment requiring parental consent for abortion as well.

    The Lefties went got the vapors. Why a tattoo is something permanent and significant that a parent should know about beforehand and have a chance to veto! But an abortion? Never!

    They couldn't come up with a good reason to mandate parental consent for being stuck with a needle while keeping getting sharp instruments stuck into your internal organs on the "trivial pursuits" list. I'll give them one:

    Mom could SEE that you got a tattoo, so she's bound to find out anyway. But abortion is invisible! So it's not like she'd ever find out!

    But you might get a tattoo on your ass where Mom wouldn't see it anyway... And if you were pregnant enough, she'd notice that your baby bump was missing. So that doesn't work, does it?

    So the Maryland abortion lovers were left with, "well it's just not fair to pollute our bill! We want it to be only about those terribly dangerous tattoos, not about something as ... as... as ...

    ... We'll get back to you on why telling parents before you scrape Susie out is a bad idea."

    Scriptures about the unborn

    Christians most often cite two scriptures when tackling abortion:

    Jeremiah 1:5 - "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart"

    Psalm 139:16 - "Your eyes saw my unformed body. All the days ordained for me were written in Your book before one of them came to be."


    These scriptures certainly speak clearly on the issue of God valuing and treasuring each of us, even before birth. They reflect the marvelous quality of God's handiwork, even before science knew exactly how detailed, complex, and sophisticated the fetus was. By eight weeks -- the time most abortions are performed -- every organ system is present in the fetus. The bones are formed, the hands and feet, kidneys and adrenal grands, eyes and ears and brain. The unborn child is God's handiwork, a masterpiece in progress. The scriptures recognize this.

    Another scriptural reference to unborn life is the wrestling in the womb of Esau and Jacob within Rebekah's body (Genesis 25:21-23):

    Isaac prayed to the Lord on behalf of his wife, because she was barren. The Lord answered his prayer, and his wife Rebekah became pregnant. The babies jostled each other within her, and she said, "Why is this happening to me?" So she went to inquire of the Lord. The Lord said to her, "Two nations are in your womb, and two peoples from within you will be separated; one people will be stronger than the other, and the older will serve the younger." (NIV)


    Of course, this scriptural passage was written long before ultrasound allowed us to observe behavior in the womb. But it turns out that twins do indeed wrestle in the womb, do touch and interact with one another. And God uses this normal human behavior, and Rebakah's unusal recognition of this behavior, to reveal the future of her descendants to Rebekah.

    Perhaps the most famous act by a fetus in the Bible is the leaping of John the Baptist within Elizabeth's womb at the sound of her cousin Mary's voice (Luke 1:41-44):

    When Elizabeth heard Mary's greeting, the baby leaped in her womb, and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit. In a loud voice she exclaimed: "Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the child you will bear! But why am I so favored, that the mother of my Lord should come to me? As soon as the sound of your greeting reached my ears, the baby in my womb leaped for joy. (NIV)


    As John the Baptist was later to announce the coming of the Messiah to the multitudes as a man, he announced the Incarnation to his mother while still in the womb. His destiny was already in motion, and the Spirit of God already active in him, directing him, even before his birth.

    If we search the Bible for signs of when God first begins to love each of us, we see that His love is eternal -- that it preceeds our existence. But how are we, who live within the limitations of time, to live out that love to one another? We can not act in love toward those who, from within our prison of time, do not yet exist, except to be prepared to welcome our fellows when they arrive in this finite world, to live out their lives among us. To countenance abortion even in theory is to prepare to reject those who God holds in His mind, who He already loves with His perfect love. And to practice abortion in reality is to reject our brothers and sisters, in a very real and concrete way, by killing them. In doing so, we sin not only against our brothers and sisters by breaking the Commandment against murder; we sin against Christ by killing Him in them, for as we do to them, we do to Him.

    1929: Abortion by physician proves fatal

    On February 21, 1929, Virginia Clark died of complications of a botched, illegal abortion. G. W. Wilbanks and W. A. N. Jones were charged with murder in her death. Wilbanks was convicted of involuntary manslaughter, and the following information comes from the Westlaw commentary on his appeal.

    Virginia was treated prior to her death by a Dr. McArthur, who testified as to her dying declaration. He said that Virginia told him that when she learned that she was pregnant, she told the man responsible that "something would have to done about it." He made arrangements for an abortion to be performed by a doctor. The paramor brought the doctor to Virginia, and he used medicine and instruments on her. The procedure was so painful that Virginia asked him to stop, so the doctor administered chloroform. According to Dr. McArthur, Virginia told him that this abortion "was what had butchered her up and was killing her."

    Virginia didn't tell her mother, Mrs. Goodwyne, about the abortion. Mrs. Goodwyne testified, "She (Virginia Clark) said that she went to the theatre or something, and it seemed like there was something broke, and she said she thought she wouldn't be able to get back to the hotel, but she did."

    Wilbanks tried to get his conviction overturned on the grounds of the difference between what Virginia told her mother, and what she told Dr. McArthur as she lay dying.

    Virginia's abortion was typical of illegal abortions in that it was performed by a physician.



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    Friday, February 20, 2009

    I laughed until it hurt

    The Epic Ballad Of Sully And The Devil-Birds

    Though maybe you have to be an English lit major or a ren-faire geek to get it.

    1988: Cheapskate abortionist kills patient with overdose

    When 23-year-old Stacy (or Stayce) went to Scott Barrett for a safe and legal abortion on February 20, 1988, she didn't know how he anesthetized his patients at Central Health Center for Women in Springfield, Missouri.

    During the abortion, Stacy stopped breathing, Barrett and his staff were unable to revive her. Staff called an ambulance, but the medics found Stacy in full cradio-respiratory arrest, with unresponsive pupils. The resuscitation attempts made by paramedics included suctioning "copious amounts of blood" from Stacy's airway, inserting an endogrecheal tube, administering medications and oxygen, putting in an IV, and using a defibrillator.

    They transferred Stacy to the emergency room, where she had a racing pulse and fixed, dilated pupils. She was unable to breathe on her own. The hospital transfused her with packed red blood cells and gave her additional IV fluids, but her EEG "revealed findings consistent with brain death. After a discussion with the patient's family, respiratory support was discontinued and the patient was pronounced dead at 11:34 p.m."

    Stacy's father requested an autopsy, which found toxic concentrations of Lidocaine in Stacy's blood. Her serum level, as tested in blood drawn 2 hour after the abortion, was 8.1 ug/ml, or more than five times the therapeutic level of 1.5 ug/ml. An expert who testified later estimated that, based on how fast the body metabolizes Lidocaine, the amount in her system at the time of the abortion could have been as high as 16 ug/ml, over ten times the therapeutic dose.

    In order to rule out other causes of death, the coroner examined ten times the normal number of specimens, looking for signs of an amniotic fluid embolism. He could find no such evidence. He also found no evidence of "any naturally occurring disease process which could account for Ms. Ruckman's death." What he did find was "history of a grand mal seizure and cardiac arrest after a 'therapeutic' abortion at 13.8 weeks gestation." Stacy also had suffered cerebral and pulmonary edema (swelling of the brain and lungs), pulmonary hemorrhage (excessive bleeding in the lungs), clotted and unclotted blood in her mouth and nose, around 55 cc of bloody fluid surrounding her lungs, and another 200 cc's of bloody fluid in her pelvic cavity.

    Stacy's parents sued. An anesthesiologist was asked under oath to give any and all possible medically valid reasons for administering that high a dose of Lidocaine; he repeatedly answered that he could think of none. The only reason he could think of -- not a medically valid one -- was to speed up the abortion. Barrett's nurse testified that he tupically did 35-40 abortions per day, at $300 each.

    She, and other staff, also testified that Barrett routinely gave patients massive dosed of Lidocaine in order to render them unconscious.

    The court found that Barrett altered or falsified Stacy's records in attempt to cover his culpability. The Medical board likewise implicated Barrett in Stacy's death.

    A jury awarded Stacy's parents $25.3 million for the wrongful death of their daughter -- $330,000 in actual damages, and $25 million in aggravated damages. However, Barrett caried no insurance and was not represented at all during the trial; he himself failed to show up.



    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    Two pre-legal abortion deaths

    On February 20, 1919, W. G. Waters and M. T. Summerlin performed an abortion on Viola Parr with instruments of some sort, causing her death. I have been unable to determine what professions Waters and Summerlin pursued when they weren't acting as abortionists.

    Viola's abortion was unusual in that it was apparently performed by an amateur, rather than by a doctor, as was the case with perhaps 90% of criminal abortions.

    Fast forward to 1927, when on February 20, 23-year-old Angerita Hargarten died in her home from an abortion performed there that day. Midwives Anna Trezek and Frances Raz were held by the coroner, Trezek as the principal and Raz as her accomplice. Again, this was unusual, but a bit more typical in that Trezek and Raz had medical training.



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    Thursday, February 19, 2009

    Today's Scripture: Matthew 25:40

    Matthew 25:40 --

    New American Standard Bible (©1995)
    "The King will answer and say to them, 'Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to one of these brothers of Mine, even the least of them, you did it to Me.'

    GOD'S WORD® Translation (©1995)
    "The king will answer them, 'I can guarantee this truth: Whatever you did for one of my brothers or sisters, no matter how unimportant [they seemed], you did for me.'

    King James Bible
    And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.

    American Standard Version
    And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it unto one of these my brethren, even these least, ye did it unto me.

    Douay-Rheims Bible
    And the king answering, shall say to them: Amen I say to you, as long as you did it to one of these my least brethren, you did it to me.

    Weymouth New Testament
    "But the King will answer them, "'In solemn truth I tell you that in so far as you rendered such services to one of the humblest of these my brethren, you rendered them to myself.'

    World English Bible
    "The King will answer them, 'Most certainly I tell you, inasmuch as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me.'

    Young's Literal Translation
    And the king answering, shall say to them, Verily I say to you, Inasmuch as ye did it to one of these my brethren -- the least -- to me ye did it.

    The word translated "truly" or "verily" is -- AMEN -- meaning very firmly, truly

    What's translated as "you rendered to" or "ye did it to", etc, is from poieo:

    1) to make
    1a) with the names of things made, to produce, construct,
    form, fashion, etc.
    1b) to be the authors of, the cause
    1c) to make ready, to prepare
    1d) to produce, bear, shoot forth
    1e) to acquire, to provide a thing for one's self
    1f) to make a thing out of something
    1g) to (make i.e.) render one anything
    1g1) to (make i.e.) constitute or appoint one anything, to
    appoint or ordain one that
    1g2) to (make i.e.) declare one anything
    1h) to put one forth, to lead him out
    1i) to make one do something
    1i1) cause one to
    1j) to be the authors of a thing (to cause, bring about)
    2) to do
    2a) to act rightly, do well
    2a1) to carry out, to execute
    2b) to do a thing unto one
    2b1) to do to one
    2c) with designation of time: to pass, spend
    2d) to celebrate, keep
    2d1) to make ready, and so at the same time to institute,
    the celebration of the passover
    2e) to perform: to a promise


    "The least" is elachistos:

    1) smallest least
    1a) in size
    1b) in amount: of management of affairs
    1c) in importance: what is the least moment
    1d) in authority: of commandments
    1e) in the estimation of men: of persons
    1f) in rank and excellence: of persons


    "Brethren" or "brothers" is adelphos:

    1) a brother, whether born of the same two parents or only of the
    same father or mother
    2) having the same national ancestor, belonging to the same
    people, or countryman
    3) any fellow or man
    4) a fellow believer, united to another by the bond of affection
    5) an associate in employment or office
    6) brethren in Christ
    6a) his brothers by blood
    6b) all men
    6c) apostles
    6d) Christians, as those who are exalted to the same heavenly place
    from 1 (as a connective particle) and delphus (the womb); a brother
    (literally or figuratively) near or remote (much like 1):-brother.


    Now, put forth an argument that by virtue of being small, young, helpless, and totally dependent, the unborn are somehow not numbered among "the least of these". It seems from this Scripture that the more insignificant a person seems, the more you'd do well to treat them as you would Jesus.

    1986: Diagnostic failure by abortionist allows patient to die

    Magnolia Reed Thomas was a 35-year-old mother of two when she went to Hedd Surgi-Center in Chicago for a safe, legal abortion. The abortion was performed by Rudolph Moragne on February 19, 1986. Moragne failed to note that the fetus was growing in Magnolia's fallopian tube, rather than in her uterus. After Magnolia was discharged from the clinic, the undiagnosed ectopic pregnancy ruptured, and Magnolia was rushed to the hospital. There, doctors did everything they could to save her, but she died from blood loss and shock on February 19, 1986.

    This was Magnolia's third abortion. Multiple abortions are a known risk factor for ectopic pregnancy.

    Even though, in theory, women who choose abortion should be less likely to die of ectopic pregnancy complications, experiences shows that they're actually more likely to die, due to sloppy practices by abortion practitioners.

    Another patient, Diane Watson, died of anesthesia compliations after she'd undergone a safe, legal abortion by Moragne at Hedd.

    For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:



    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    For Students: The Grosvenor-Sessions Abortion Case


    This is aimed primarily at students who might be looking for a topic for a term paper, debate, or speech. Instead of doing my write-up, I am going to provide primary source documents for an historic abortion case in the US Colonial era, along with some questions for you. The entire exercise is an excellent one for honing research and analysis skills. And although you can't draw definitive conclusions from just one case, you can use it as an example to combine with other evidence to try to paint as accurate a picture as you can of abortion as practiced in Colonial times.

    I've found that writing up these historic abortion cases challenged many of my assumptions, introduced ideas that hadn't occurred to me before, and reinforced other assumptions. I'm hoping that regardless of your stand on abortion it will do the same for you. The more thought and consideration we give to the dynamics of abortion, the more we can do to prevent the practice -- a goal all prolifers and most prochoicers would agree on.

    Before you start looking at the documents, think a while about some of what you've been taught about abortion historically -- what the different people have said to you, what you've seen written up, and what conclusions you yourself have drawn.

    Was it common?
    Was it legal in the time period in question?
    Was it approved of? By whom? Why or why not? What role did concern for the fetus play? Concern for the mother? Other concerns (social stability, religious beliefs, etc.)?
    Was it perceived as safe or dangerous? Why?
    Was the perceived safety or danger the primary concern?
    Was it practiced openly or secretly?
    How did people go about arranging abortions?
    Who took the the lead in making abortion arrangements?
    Was abortion thought of as killing a baby?

    Since this is a death, it's also important to ask before you read:

    Was the mother's death thought of as the only crime, the primary crime, the secondary crime?
    How much significance was placed on the death of the fetus?

    Now it's time to start reading original source documents. The involved parties' depositions are here, and the indictments here.

    As you read, try to develop a timeline of who was doing what and when it was happening. What roles did various people play? What was their perception of what was happening? What impact did social mores, laws, religion, relationships, and other circumstances play?

    You can double-check your timeline against this chronology when you're finished. More commentary and questions are available here, and another person's commentary here.

    Were any aspects of this case surprising to you? What aspects played out the way you thought they would have? What did you learn? Do you think your preconceptions played a role in how you interpreted the events? Read these accounts and analyses, and consider what sorts of conclusions others drew from the same source documents. What other sources might they have had access to that you lack? What further information do you need?

  • "Taking the trade": abortion and gender relations in an eighteenth-century New England village. (abstract)
  • Sexual Borderlands
  • Sarah Grosvenor vs. Mary Fish
  • Contraception and Abortion in Nineteenth-Century America
  • Meehan Reports (Use search to find the reference, then look at the surrounding work and compare it to what you see elsewhere.)
  • When Abortion Was a Crime (Use search to find the reference, then look at the surrounding work and compare it to what you see elsewhere.)

    Do you think this young woman's death could have been prevented? If so, how? What role did law, social mores, family and social dynamics, the relationship with the man, and medical practices of the time play in her death?

    Most importantly: What are we doing today that might be preventing such tragedies? Facilitating them? What can or should we change? What can or should we maintain or protect?
  • Wednesday, February 18, 2009

    Nonsensical headline of the day, courtesy of Fox News

    North Dakota House Gives Fertilized Eggs Human Status

    A fertilized egg is an egg that contains an embryo.

    Earth to the Associated Press: HUMANS DON'T LAY EGGS. No mammals do. Our embryos gestate inside the bodies of their mothers.

    Today's scripture: 1 Peter 4:9

    1 Peter 4:9
    "Be hospitable to one another without complaint." (NAS)
    "Be hospitable to one another without grumbling." (KJV)

    The word translated "be hospitable" is " philoxenos" -- simply, "hospitable, generous to guests".

    The word translated "complaint" is "goggusmos" -- "a murmur, murmuring, muttering; a secret debate; a secret displeasure not openly avowed"

    In other words, you're called to be hospitable without being cranky about it.

    Lest hospitality seem a trivial, Martha Stewarty thing beneath the believer's notice, take a look at these studies and commentaries:

  • Hospitality: "The need for shelter is a fundamental human need. None of us ever knows for sure when we might be uprooted and cast on the mercy of others. But how do we overcome our fear in order to welcome and shelter a stranger? The Christian practice of hospitality is the practice of providing a space to take in a stranger. It also encompasses the skills of welcoming friends and family to our tables, to claim the joy of homecoming." Read the whole thing; it's short but to the point.

  • Exodus Network: "The word "hospitality" can only be found in the Bible (NIV) five times! Yet, the spirit of hospitality can be seen throughout the Word."

  • Nave's Topical Bible: Extensive Scriptural links to themes of hospitality.

  • Hospitality in the House of God: "Hospitality is a common theme throughout the Bible. References to hospitality first appear in the Hebrew Scriptures--the Torah (Law)--and are found throughout the history of Israel, the Psalms, the books of the prophets, the Gospels, and the writings of John, Paul, and Peter." Follow the links to further study.

    This is just a starter. Hospitality from a Scriptural standpoint is not the same as entertaining. It is recognizing God in others, and offering to them what we would offer to Our Lord -- a welcome, a meeting of the needs for food and shelter, a place of rest and refreshment.

    How hospitable are we being when we deny our own offspring the safety of our wombs? If we refuse to love our own children, sheltered in our bodies, how can we claim to love our brothers and sisters who seek refuge in our homes?

    Likewise we are called upon to offer hospitality to the troubled pregnant woman, to see to it that she has her needs met, so that she in turn can offer the hospitality of her love to her unborn child.
  • Tuesday, February 17, 2009

    Wisdom in the strangest places

    Such as 5 Things You Think Will Make You Happy (But Won't) (PROFANITY ALERT!!!)

    Conclusion: Stop worrying so much about yourself and shift your focus outward, to doing good and practicing your faith.

    Psalm 119:14
    I rejoice in following your statutes as one rejoices in great riches.

    Proverbs 11:28
    Whoever trusts in his riches will fall, but the righteous will thrive like a green leaf.

    Proverbs 30:8
    Keep falsehood and lies far from me; give me neither poverty nor riches, but give me only my daily bread.

    Jeremiah 9:23-24 (New International Version)
    This is what the LORD says: "Let not the wise man boast of his wisdom or the strong man boast of his strength or the rich man boast of his riches, but let him who boasts boast about this: that he understands and knows me, that I am the LORD, who exercises kindness, justice and righteousness on earth, for in these I delight," declares the LORD.

    1949: Attempt to cover up abortion death

    On February 17, 1949, the battered body of Mrs. Roberta Shirley Danks, a 28-year-old war widow from Chicago, was found crumpled on a rural road near Chesterton, Indiana. She had bruises over her body and a deep gash on her head, but an autopsy revealed that these injuries had been sustained after her death, evidently to try to make Roberta appear to be the victim of a hit-and-run driver. She had actually died of peritonitis from a criminal abortion performed several days earlier.

    An investigation found that Roberta had undergone an abortion, performed by a physician, in the basement of the Chicago home of 40-year-old housewife Olive Janes. Roberta had been on leave from her job as a switchboard operator at Roosevelt College in Chicago.

    Roberta's boyfriend, 36-year-old James Manes, who had been involved with her for three years, said he hadn't seen her since February 6.

    Janes was sentenced to 7 - 14 years for manslaughter, plus 5 - 10 years on two other abortion counts.

    Dorothy's abortion was typical of criminal abortions in that it was performed by a doctor, as was the case with perhaps 90% of criminal abortions



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below..

    1995: Biskind's forgotten patient

    Lisa Bardsley was 26 years old when she went to Dr. John Biskind in Phoenix, Arizona. She was at least 20 weeks pregnant when she underwent her supposedly safe and legal abortion on February 16, 1995. An hour after the abortion was completed, Lisa was discharged from the clinic. With a friend who had accompanied her, Lisa headed home to northern Arizona.

    Lisa took ill, so she and her friend stopped at a motel and called for medical help. Lisa was taken to a hospital in Cottonwood, where she died February 17. The autopsy showed that she'd bled to death from a large uterine laceration.

    Biskind went on to get into further trouble for delivering a live, nearly term infant during an abortion performed on a teenager, and for the abortion death of Lou Ann Herron. Herron's death got far more press than Bardsley's, whose death for some reason did not capture public attention or generate outrage the way Herron's death did.

    Biskind's license was finally revoked in 1998.

    The clinic where Lisa died was owned by abortionist Moshe Hachamovitch, who was implicated in the abortion deaths of Christina Goesswein, Tanya Williamson, Luz Rodriguez, and Jammie Garcia.

    For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:



    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    1929: Abortion by housewife proves fatal

    On February 17, 1929, 25-year-old Violet Diancalana died in the home of Katherine Bajda, of complications of a criminal abortion performed on her there that day.

    Mrs. Bajda, identified as a homemaker, was held by the coroner. On March 15, Bajda was indicted for felony murder by a grand jury.

    Violet's abortion was unusual in that it was performed by an amateur, rather than by a doctor, as was the case with perhaps 90% of criminal abortions.



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    Monday, February 16, 2009

    Today's scripture: Psalms 119:169

    Psalms 119:169 -- Let my cry come near before thee, O LORD: give me understanding according to thy word. - (KJV)

    Nothing lengthy today, just a reminder that in time of trouble, while we might cry out to God to release us from our trouble, wisdom comes in asking first for understanding. The trouble may well have some good purpose, if only we seek it.

    More illegal deaths, more pondering

    I've been adding to the Cemetery of Choice, a few deaths from old news clippings, but a whole batch from the Homicide in Chicago Interactive Database. Either I'd missed a bunch before, or a whole slew have been added.

    What's odd is that it tends to be supporters of legal abortion who get all snotty with me about how far back in time I go when researching abortion deaths. I'd expected that their response would be to try to focus my attention on the older ones, to challenge me with something akin to, "How can you look at all that carnage from criminal abortions and not appreciate how much better safe, legal abortion is?" But by and large, they don't, possibly because of how indistinguishable so many of these deaths are from the nice sanitary safe-n-legal kind.

    I don't think I've ever gotten a single criticism from prolifers for listing all the illegal abortion deaths -- stories that, after all, short sighted abortion supporters could use as ammunition in a debate with somebody who isn't very well educated about criminal abortion. The prolifers might be bewildered, but they're never outraged.

    What I have gotten from both sides is "Why do you do it?" To which I'd answer, "Why does Adrian Monk touch parking meters?" It's a compulsion. A bizarre, ghoulish compulsion. I said it to a reporter who considered it worth putting in print: "My ministry is to the dead." All of these women died because of an idea -- the idea that women and their unborn children are mortal enemies, that a baby's death can be a boon to its mother. And that idea, if it's true... well, to paraphrase Jeremy Irons in The Mission, if that's true, then might really does make right and love has no place in the world. And I don't think I have the strength to live in a world like that.

    It's been a learning experience, that's for sure. I started out the project very naive, thinking that quack abortionists were swiftly and surely locked up in the olden days. There's nothing quite like digging into the past to dispel that illusion. Chicago, in particular, seemed to have run a revolving-door justice system in which abortionists who killed their patients were scolded, locked up long enough to lull the public into a sense of security, then set free to ply their trade again.

    Digging up the past has done a lot to convince me that both sides are misinformed and working toward a cure that is an illusion. The prochoicers see the past as an endless vista of coathanger-impaled women who would have lived and thrived had there just been legal permission for doctors to rid them of their unwanted fetuses, and the present as an era of competent and compassionate "providers" of "vital reproductive health care services". All that's necessary, in their eyes, is to throw enough contraceptives around, with abortion as a backup, and all will be rosy. The prolifers tend to see the past as a golden age in which abortion was virtually non-existent, to which we could quickly return if only we could pass a personhood amendment.

    Both sides are wrong in their assessments.

    There were gruesome, horrible abortions back in the bad old days. But there are gruesome, horrible abortions now. Legalizing abortion did nothing to change the kinds of people who are attracted to the business. As abortion advocate Magda Denes noted, "Reknown is no guarantee of skill. Skill is no safeguard aginst cruelty. Patients are utterly vulnerable to the mental health of their helpers. The helpers should, therefore, be watched like potential enemies." And it's in the abortion supporters' self-interest to heed Denes' words. Every instance of quackery is, after all, ammo for the enemy to argue that legal abortion ain't all it's cracked up to be.

    But contrariwise, prolifers need to grasp that recriminalizing abortion won't stop it. It will only limit it. As long as the idea is put forth in respectable circles that abortion is palliative, many women will resort to it. We need to ask ourselves what our goal is -- to punish abortion, or to reduce it to an absolute irreducible minimum.

    Prochoicers act as if the morality is unclear, but the solution is clear: lots of contraceptives with abortion as a backup. But they're wrong. The morality is clear: any society that drives woman to kill their own children is a seriously screwed up society that needs fixing; it's the solution that's unclear. We ridicule the abortion supporter for the simple, one-size-fits-all solution of abortion to all social, emotional, and medical dilemmas for the pregnant women. But we're equally over-simplistic when we present criminalization as a simple, one-size-fits-all solution.

    This post is highly unsatisfactory to me. I like to have a nice, clean, simple thing to say. And I don't. All I can do is share my dismay and bewilderment when I ponder how we can ever cut through all the muddle and build a society where mothers and their unborn children aren't pitted against each other as if they're natural rivals instead of natural allies.

    "Haunted" or "Don't judge the glibness; it might be a cover-up"

    Haunted is a haunting post by The Raving Theist.

    The two carefree young women in the bar were roommates. One of them was pregnant. The condition was temporary. In a few days her late-summer drinking companion would drive her to a clinic for an abortion, just as she had driven so many other friends to “get theirs.” That appointment made way for a relaxing evening, for the aversion the pregnant woman briefly felt towards alcohol was relieved by a sensible reminder.

    “You are going to kill it anyway.”

    Her friend was indifferent to who heard this remark (and many did) because the observation was so ordinary. It was like explaining why it didn’t matter if paint splattered on a pair of worn, soon-to-be discarded shoes. After another round of drinks and cheerful conversation, the comment would be forgotten.

    It would also be remembered, some 18 years later.


    Both young women would be haunted not only by the remark but by the reality behind it. Read it all and reflect that what you see might not be all that is there.

    1925: Fatal abortion performed by midwife in Chicago

    On February 16, 1925, 28-year-old Agnes Crowe died in Chicago's West Side Hospital from a criminal abortion performed that day. The coroner indicated that a female midwife was responsible for Agnes' death, but did not name the guilty party.



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    Sunday, February 15, 2009

    Why time doesn't heal all wounds.

    Ashli has posted what I might think of as a Best-Of: Ashli explaining why crying "Heal!" won't heal a mother's broken heart.

    I was at the fax machine at work on Friday, stamping "FAXED" on some papers and scribbling "2-13-09" in the little box. And it smacked me right between the eyes how much time had passed since my dear friend had gotten struck and killed by a pickup truck as he was hitchhiking to a gas station. The huge gap between then and now, the nine years that have passed, smacked me in the head. My life has gone on. Dans' ended. I left him back there, his body broken on a Texas highway, spirit set free. And for me, nine years without him. Nine years of no Dan to go home to. Nine years of things Dan wasn't there for, both good and bad: 9/11, my granddaughter's birth, the election, my new job. Everything I've had for the past nine years is something I've had without Dan, something that Dan didn't have any part of. It took my breath away. I nearly burst into tears there by the fax machine. And I said a prayer for Ashli, because I know that when I'm getting these smacks with the 500-pound wet fish of loss, I'm getting a smidgen of what she gets when the fish hits.

    The most helpful thing anybody said in the immediate aftermath of Dan's death was when my father said, "You never get over something like that." He let me know that he understood what it was to lose your best friend. He'd lost his in 1979. He knew.

    The very word "compassion" means "suffer with". Platitudes make you feel better. Shutting up and listening is hard. Admitting your helplessness to make it better is harder.

    If you want to say something comforting to a woman who has lost a child to an abortion, don't. Just admit that there's not a goddam thing you can say or do that will bring her baby back, nothing you can say or do that will give her the thing she needs more than anything else. She needs her baby. She wants her baby. She aches for her baby. You can't say anything to make that better. You can only say stuff that makes it worse.

    Think of the worst loss of your life. Think of the worst guilt of your life. Think of the worst anguish of your life. Think of how they come back to haunt you at night sometimes. Imagine them on this scale: Your child dead because you signed the death warrant.

    Then just stop trying to make it all better. Nothing this side of Paradise will.

    Assorted Scriptures on the Unborn Today

    In the last Scripture posting, I looked at Exodus 21 and Abortion. Now let's look at some other Scriptures.

    Christians most often cite two scriptures when tackling abortion:

    Jeremiah 1:5 - "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart"
    Psalm 139:16 - "Your eyes saw my unformed body. All the days ordained for me were written in Your book before one of them came to be."


    These scriptures certainly speak clearly on the issue of God valuing and treasuring each of us, even before birth. They reflect the marvelous quality of God's handiwork, even before science knew exactly how detailed, complex, and sophisticated the fetus was. By eight weeks -- the time most abortions are performed -- every organ system is present in the fetus. The bones are formed, the hands and feet, kidneys and adrenal grands, eyes and ears and brain. The unborn child is God's handiwork, a masterpiece in progress. The scriptures recognize this.

    Another scriptural reference to unborn life is the wrestling in the womb of Esau and Jacob within Rebekah's body (Genesis 25:21-23):

    Isaac prayed to the Lord on behalf of his wife, because she was barren. The Lord answered his prayer, and his wife Rebekah became pregnant. The babies jostled each other within her, and she said, "Why is this happening to me?" So she went to inquire of the Lord. The Lord said to her, "Two nations are in your womb, and two peoples from within you will be separated; one people will be stronger than the other, and the older will serve the younger." (NIV)


    Of course, this scriptural passage was written long before ultrasound allowed us to observe behavior in the womb. But it turns out that twins do indeed wrestle in the womb, do touch and interact with one another. And God uses this normal human behavior, and Rebakah's unusal recognition of this behavior, to reveal the future of her descendants to Rebekah.

    Perhaps the most famous act by a fetus in the Bible is the leaping of John the Baptist within Elizabeth's womb at the sound of her cousin Mary's voice (Luke 1:41-44):

    When Elizabeth heard Mary's greeting, the baby leaped in her womb, and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit. In a loud voice she exclaimed: "Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the child you will bear! But why am I so favored, that the mother of my Lord should come to me? As soon as the sound of your greeting reached my ears, the baby in my womb leaped for joy. (NIV)


    As John the Baptist was later to announce the coming of the Messiah to the multitudes as a man, he announced the Incarnation to his mother while still in the womb. His destiny was already in motion, and the Spirit of God already active in him, directing him, even before his birth.

    If we search the Bible for signs of when God first begins to love each of us, we see that His love is eternal -- that it precedes our existence. But how are we, who live within the limitations of time, to live out that love to one another? We can not act in love toward those who, from within our prison of time, do not yet exist, except to be prepared to welcome our fellows when they arrive in this finite world, to live out their lives among us. To countenance abortion even in theory is to prepare to reject those who God holds in His mind, who He already loves with His perfect love. And to practice abortion in reality is to reject our brothers and sisters, in a very real and concrete way, by killing them. In doing so, we sin not only against our brothers and sisters by breaking the Commandment against murder; we sin against Christ by killing Him in them, for as we do to them, we do to Him.

    1890: Abortion proves fatal for Chicago woman

    On February 16, 1890, Mrs. Mary Keegan died from complications of an illegal abortion performed that day. Mary died at the location where the abortion was performed. Mrs. Annie Schneider was arrested and held by the Coroner's Jury. Mrs. Schneider is described as employed in an unidentified profession. The Homicide in Chicago Interactive Database shows no other illegal abortion deaths associated with Mrs. Schneider.



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    1920: Death will lead to different conclusions

    Mrs. Margaret Ann Marts died in her home on February 15, 1920, two or three days after her discharge from the hospital. Dr. J.S. Snider performed an autopsy that day, and concluded that she'd died of sepsis. She still had retained placenta in her uterus which could not have still been from her recent term pregnancy. He also indicated that she couldn't have become pregnant again after the birth if she had retained the placenta. Dr. Snider verified that some instrument larger than a catheter had been used to cause an abortion. On May 28, 1920, Dr. E. Anderson was convicted of manslaughter in the death.

    The events that led to her death had begun shortly after Mrs. Marts had given birth on August 19, 1919. She recovered well, bottle-fed the baby, and began menstruating again about four weeks after the birth.

    On January 19, 1920, the family physician, Dr. Davis, was called to examine Mrs. Marts. She'd stopped menstruating about six weeks earlier, had concluded that she was pregnant, and had attmepted to perform an abortion on herself with a catheter. She said that if Dr. Davis didn't do an abortion, she'd find somebody else who would because she'd rather die than give birth again.

    Upon examining Mrs. Marts, Dr. Davis found some irritation caused by the catheter, and an enlarged uterus which he attributed to pregnancy. However, in order to divert Mrs. Marts away from the idea of trying to abort, he told her that she wasn't pregnant. He administered a douche and noted that his patient was in good health.

    Dr. Davis then told Mr. Marts that his wife was pregnant, and explained his efforts to turn her mind away from the idea of aborting.

    That afternoon, Mrs. Marts turned to a Dr. Anderson, who she'd previously never seen. He did not examine her, but made arrangements to go to her home around noon the following day, January 20, to perform "an operation." According to Anderson, Mrs. Marts had given her name as "Mrs. Crooks," and said that she was about two months pregnant and that she had bought an instrument in a drug store, which she'd then used to try to induce an abortion.

    On January 20, Mrs. Marts placed a call to the home of her friend, Mrs. Stella Blythe. Mrs. Blythe's sister, Mrs. Mattie Wallace, was visiting and took the call. Mrs. Marts asked Mrs. Wallace to send Mrs. Blythe to her house, because she was going to be chloroformed. Both sisters went to Mrs. Marts' home. Dr. Anderson was there, along with a Black woman named Ida Bush. Mrs. Marts was in bed, and Dr. Anderson was in the kitchen preparing his instruments.

    Dr. Anderson sent Ida Bush to get some chloroform. Mrs. Blythe remained in the bedroom, but her sister, due to her "delicate condition," left the room. One of the women helped with administering the chloroform. Mrs. Blythe did not see all the details of what Dr. Anderson did, but noticed that he used two instruments. She took one to be a speculum, and described the other as about a foot long and similar to scissors. Dr. Anderson used water and cotton during the procedure, which took about fifteen minutes. Mrs. Blythe testified that she didn't know what Dr. Anderson was doing with the instruments.

    Mrs. Blythe reported that some time between noon and 1:00, Mrs. Wallace asked Dr. Anderson, "Now what time will this pass?" And Dr. Anderson responded, "That will be all right about 4 or 5 o'clock." Neither party said specifically what would pass. Mrs. Marts also asked Mrs. Blythe to call Mr. Marts and tell him that she'd been operated on and was doing well.

    Four days later, Dr. Davis, the family physician, was called in to examine Mrs. Marts, who had taken to her bed and was in serious condition. She was expelling a foul-smelling mix of blood and pus. Dr. Davis found damage to her uterus, clearly from an abortion, and treated her for her infection.

    Mrs. Marts spoke to her husband of what had happened. The conversation took place shortly before she was taken to the hospital on January 24 or 25. She told him she was sure she was dying, and that she blamed Dr. Anderson. She said that Dr. Anderson had lied to her, telling her that the operation wouldn't be "very severe," and that she'd only be sick three or four days. She said she was sorry she'd gone to Anderson. She also gave her husband instructions regarding the care of their children.

    Mrs. Martz was discharged from the hospital for reasons that aren't clear in Westlaw documents. She again conversed with her husband about what had happened, asserting that she knew she was dying, that it was Dr. Anderson's fault, and that she was sorry she'd ever gone to him. She gave her husband the details of the operation, but these details were not revealed in Westlaw documents.

    Anderson admitted that he had chloroformed and operated upon Mrs. Marts on the 20th of January, but insisted that he'd only been treating her for the infection and damage she'd done to herself with the catheter. He also said that Mr. Marts had assaulted him, choked him, and tried to shake him down for $500.

    Ida Bush, who had been present at the home on the 20th, described the instruments, said that she'd boiled water for sterilizing them, but that she was sent out of the room and did not witness what Dr. Anderson did with them. She said she was told that she was too young and would not understand such things.

    The jury found Dr. Anderson guilty, and he was fined $500.

    Margaret's abortion was typical of pre-legalization abortions in that it was performed by a physician.

    Both sides of the abortion struggle will no doubt find fault with Dr. Davis. The prochoice will hold that he should have either performed a nice safe abortion on Margaret or have referred her to a reputable professional abortionist. The prolife will hold that he should have made it clear to her why abortion was unacceptable, perhaps adding anecdotes of patients who had initially requested abortions only to change their minds. But we can agree he ought not to have simply lied to her.



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    1925: Another victim of Dr. Lucy Hagenow

    On February 15, 1925, Nina H. Pierce, a 22-year-old white woman, died at the Chicago Lying-In Hospital from complications of a criminal abortion believed to have been performed that day by Dr. Lucy Hagenow. Hagenow was arrested the day Nina died, at the crime scene, as was Nina's husband, Logan Pierce. Both of them were exonerated by the coroner on March 5, 1925. But on June 10, Hagenow was held to a Grand Jury on $25,000 bond, and Pierce released, by Judge Schulman.

    Other Chicago abortion deaths attributed to Dr. Lucy Hagenow, aka Dr. Louise Hagenow, aka Dr. Ida Von Schultz, include:

  • 1899: Marie Hecht
  • 1906: Lola Madison
  • 1907: Annie Horvatich
  • 1925: Lottie Lowy, Jean Cohen, Bridget Masterson, and Elizabeth Welter
  • 1926: Mary Moorehead

    Hagenow was typical of criminal abortionists in that she was a physician.



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.
  • Roundup: Child of rape, women rebels, etc.

  • Child born of rape victim thanks mom who said, "I couldn't kill a kitten or a puppy, how could I kill an innocent baby?"

  • Planned Parenthood, President Obama, and "Too Many" Abortions

  • Women rebel over forced abortions (And it's about freaking time the proponents of "choice" started noticing the horrible goings-on in China. They've been looking the other way for decades.)

  • The Midwife of Auschwitz
  • Saturday, February 14, 2009

    Today's scripture: Exodus 21:22-25

    One Scripture that gets batted back and forth between prolifers and abortion defenders is Exodus 21:22-25.

    If men who are fighting hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman's husband demands and the court allows. But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise. (NIV)


    or

    If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart [from her], and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges [determine]. 23. And if [any] mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25. burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe. (King James Version)


    Some Christians try to use this scripture to defend abortion, saying that it means that causing a miscarriage isn't the same as causing the death of a human being. The person who strikes the pregnant woman, they claim, is only liable if the premature expulsion of the fetus also injures or kills the mother. The death of the fetus, they claim, is a minor offense and only requires restitution, as would be appropriate for damaging a man's property. Which group was interpreting this passage appropriately? I turned to About.com's Christian Humor Guide, Greg Hartman, for help. Here's what he had to say:

    The King James renders it "her fruit depart from her"; the NKJV gives it as "gives birth prematurely." What does the term mean? We think of premature birth and miscarriage as two different things; miscarriage being a natural abortion and premature birth being a live baby.

    There are several nearly irrefutable arguments against this passage referring to the death of the baby:

    1. The word translated "serious injury" (ason in Hebrew) is never used to refer to death in the Bible. Whether the term "serious injury" refers to injury to the mother or the child (or both) can be determined as a consequence of the survival or death of the baby. We can already see from the passage that death of the mother is not an issue here; on the possible death of the baby:

    2. This verse is in the section of Assault Laws, not the section of Homicide Laws (v 12-17). Therefore it doesn't refer to death at all, either of the baby or the mother.

    3. The statement "eye for eye, tooth for tooth, burn for burn" etc. is a formula statement known the "lex talionis" (i.e., Law of Retribution). It is used in many other places in the Law in the same pattern, and it does not include death.

    Notice, for instance, that the lex talionis covers various types of permanent injury -- dismemberment, loss of an eye or tooth, burns, etc. -- but not death. Murder and/or what we call involuntary manslaughter are covered separately. For instance, Leviticus 24:20 includes the lex talionis, but death is covered separately in the next verse (see also Numbers 35:11).

    Since the lex talionis appears here with no specific reference to death, death is almost certainly not considered here at all. Therefore, the death of mother or fetus would be judged under the murder or accidental death laws cited above.

    4. The phrase translated "premature birth" (yeled yatsa in Hebrew; literally "her children came out") does not favor the idea that the death of the baby is described here. The phrase yeled yatsa is never used in passages referring to miscarriage; the word that is used for miscarriage (Hebrew sakal) is not used here. Sakal is used some 23 times in the Old Testament; sometimes it is rendered as "miscarry" in the NIV but always -- invariably -- it refers
    to childlessness.

    Bottom line: This phrase refers to a premature birth, caused by the fight, which the baby survives. If there is no other injury beyond the premature birth, the guilty party is fined according the judges' decision based upon the husband's demands. If there is any other injury -- and we have determined that the baby is alive here -- the lex talionis would apply to
    the mother and the baby equally, meaning that the guilty party would suffer the same retributive punishment determined by the injury of the victim. And in this case, the victim could be either the baby or the mother.

    Therefore the "value status" of the fetus, according to this passage, is equal to that of the mother.


    When I looked online for commentaries on this passage, I also found other points being reinforced. One is that this verse underscores is that we are responsible not only for wrongs we deliberately inflict on others, but also even for harm we cause unintentionally, through our carelessness.

    Another point was that pregnant women were singled out for particular care. The passage doesn't specify penalties for harming bystanders in general during a conflict, but specifically protects the expectant mother and her unborn child. The miraculous process of gestation, of bringing fruition to a new life, is given special attention.

    2007: Planned Parenthood patient died of Toxic Shock Syndrome

    Edrica Goode (pictured) went to a Planned Parenthood in Riverside, California, on January 31, 2007, for a safe, legal second-trimester abortion. She was a little over 14 weeks pregnant.

    A nurse there inserted laminaria to dilate Edrica's cervx, although Edrica had "odiferous creamy-colored discharge", indicative of a vaginal infection, at the time. Laminaria are sticks of seaweed that absorb moisture and expand, so they would wick any bacteria or viruses from the vagina into the uterus.

    Edrica, who had not told her family about the abortion, did not return to the facility to have the laminaria removed and the abortion completed because her mental state had deteriorated overnight. She had became feverish, her mother said. She became mentally "confused and disoriented," not knowing what day it was, and started acting aggressively. She also began vomiting.

    Planned Parenthood's patient profile for Edrica said that they mailed Edrica two letters telling her that she had to return and have the laminaria removed, but Edrica's mother said that the letters never arrived. She does indicate that Planned Parenthood called, but that Edrica was too sick to take the calls.

    Edrica's family took her to Riverside County Regoinal Medical Center on February 4. A blood test there revealed the pregnancy to the physicians, but the hospital did not perform a pelvic exam because at the time Edrica was unable to consent to the examination due to confusion and inappropriate speech.

    Edrica was treated in the medical ward for five days, then transferred to a psychiatric unit, which promptly sent her back to the medical unit to have them check her for possible sepsis. There, her condition continued to deteriorate. After Edrica's boyfriend told her family about the visit to Planned Parenthood, staff at the hospital performed a pelvic examination and discovered the laminaria, along with some gauze. Edrica miscarried that day, and died the next day, Valentine's Day.

    The coroner's report attributes Edrica's death to toxic shock syndrome, prolonged retention of laminaria, and pregnancy. Which means that her death will likely be counted as a pregnancy death by health statisticians, but not as an abortion death because no abortion actually took place.

    Edrica had been a student at Riverside Community College. Her mother said that she enjoyed traveling and reading. Her mother commented, "My daughter made a choice, but she didn't choose to die." She added, "A lost dog gets more attention than my daughter did. This has really torn at my family."

    Edrica is the third known death among Planned Parenthood patients in California in four years. Holly Patterson (pictured, left), 18, died of an infection after an RU-486 abortion in 2003. Diana Lopez (pictured, with her children), 25, bled to death in 2002 after her cervix was punctured during the procedure. Edrica's mother's lawyer indicates that Planned Parenthood did not report any of these deaths to the state, as required by law.

    State records indicate that the clinic inquestion was last inspected in July of 2003. The inspection found 12 deficiencies, most involving recordkeeping and documentation problems that were to be corrected by Sept. 20, 2003. The file doesn't show if the corrections were made or not.

    For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:



    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    1925: One of many victims of Dr. Lucy Hagenow

    On February 15, 1925, Nina H. Pierce, a 22-year-old white woman, died at the Chicago Lying-In Hospital from complications of a criminal abortion believed to have been performed that day by Dr. Lucy Hagenow.

    Hagenow was arrested the day Nina died, at the crime scene, as was Nina's husband, Logan Pierce.

    Both of them were exonerated by the coroner on March 5, 1925. But on June 10, Hagenow was held to a Grand Jury on $25,000 bond, and Pierce released, by Judge Schulman.

    Other Chicago abortion deaths attributed to Dr. Lucy Hagenow, aka Dr. Louise Hagenow, aka Dr. Ida Von Schultz, include:

  • 1899: Marie Hecht
  • 1906: Lola Madison
  • 1907: Annie Horvatich
  • 1925: Lottie Lowy, Jean Cohen, Bridget Masterson, and Elizabeth Welter
  • 1926: Mary Moorehead

    Hagenow was typical of criminal abortionists in that she was a physician.

    One thing we need to learn from these deaths is that we need abortion laws with real teeth in them if we are to keep dangerous quacks like Lucy Hagenow behind bars, where they can't harm anybody. Simple bans are not enough. They need to be clear and enforceable.

    And society needs to get past the point where pregnant women feel so alone and without hope that they're turning to people like Hagenow for some semblance of help.



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.
  • 1942: Abortion proves fatal for newly wed heiress

    On February 14, 1942, Florence Nimick Schnoor, age 24, died at St. Joseph's Hospital in New York of what the coroner called a "brutal and inept" illegal abortion. Florence, grand-niece of Andrew Carnegie and heiress to a Pittsburgh steel fortune, had eloped with Richard H. Schnoor, sergeant-at-arms of the New York State Assembly, nine days earlier.

    Her husband reported that he had taken her to White Plains so she could catch a train to New York for a day's shopping. Later that morning, she called and asked him to pick her up at the station. He found her obviously ill and asking for a doctor. He took her straight to the hospital, where she died three hours later.

    Doctors reported that Florence refused to discuss her case at all, much less implicate the abortionist, despite pleas from her husband. Investigators contacted all 200 people whose names were in Florence's address book, but were unable to gain any clues as to who performed the fatal abortion. All they were able to piece together is that Florence evidently paid $40 for the abortion.

    Florence's husband was not implicated in her death; police belived that he had not even known Florence was pregnant.

    I've found Florence's name in the 1930 US Census. She was 12 years old, living with her parents and 9-year-old sister in Connecticut. It's heartbreaking to think that there she was, as vital and alive as any little girl, being counted in the census along with everybody else in the country -- and nobody could have know that her life was halfway over.



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    Friday, February 13, 2009

    Roundup

  • The Greatest Joy -- and who, really, is your true self?

  • This cartoon at Jewish World Review nails the impact of the "stimulus" on "health care reform".

  • Devilish Thoughts on Abortion

  • And for the WTF? category, a book, Our Bodies, Our Crimes, reviewed here. What's up with the cover? Is the author lamenting a prostitution arrest? Implying that this woman is being arrested (right out in the street) for possession of birth control pills or having an abortion? For being female? How out-of-touch are the contents of the book, when the cover seems to be implying that merely being female is grounds for immediate arrest?

    The reviewer wanted to be kind but couldn't; likely the book is a literary train wreck -- something horrid that you just can't stop staring at. I imagine the author just ranting endlessly about how any time any woman doesn't get her way in a matter related to her reproductive organs or the fruits thereof, it's because she's being "criminalized" for being female by the "patriarchy". (I'm not only judging a book by its cover -- though this one deserves to be. I'm also considering the review, which noted that the author "deplores both the medicalization of abortion and its distance from mainstream medical practice—but what does she propose as a viable alternative?" Sounds like somebody who's just never satisfied with anything and makes a profession of griping.

    Anybody?
  • Today's Scripture: Romans 12:21

    Romans 12:21:

    New American Standard Bible (©1995)
    Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

    GOD'S WORD® Translation (©1995)
    Don't let evil conquer you, but conquer evil with good.

    King James Bible
    Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.

    Bible in Basic English
    Do not let evil overcome you, but overcome evil by good.

    Young's Literal Translation
    Be not overcome by the evil, but overcome, in the good, the evil.


    The Greek word translated "overcome" is transliterated nikao:

    1. to conquer
    a. to carry off the victory, come off victorious
    2. of Christ, victorious over all His foes
    3. of Christians, that hold fast their faith even unto death against the power of their foes, and temptations and persecutions
    when one is arraigned or goes to law, to win the case, maintain one's cause


    The Greek word translated as "evil" is transliterated kakos, giving us this astonishingly mundane definition:

    1. of a bad nature
    a. not such as it ought to be
    2. of a mode of thinking, feeling, acting
    a. base, wrong, wicked
    3. troublesome, injurious, pernicious, destructive, baneful


    It's interesting to note that this scripture does not say, "Do not overcome evil with evil." It says do not be overcome with evil.

    I've often said, "Evil is never the servant; it is always the master", meaning that if you think you are using evil means to achieve good ends, you're being deceived. Evil isn't merely a concept; it's a metaphysical reality that you get caught up in, to your great peril. And if you look at people who committed great acts of evil, you'll nearly always find they either started out with good intentions, or started out with so petty and trivial a wrong that it hardly seems worth even chiding somebody over. Psychopaths like Ted Bundy start out with just sexual fantasies -- which they then are overcome with a compulsion to carry out. Just a warning -- playing with evil is playing with fire in a very Big League way. And this Scripture is a warning not against necessary huge and spectacular evils, but of badness that may be simply "troublesome, injurious", or "not as it ought to be" to as bad as "pernicious" -- but weighing in at the lightweight end of the evil scale.

    And this is, after all, how women often end up on the abortion table: the sin of indulging in illicit thoughts, that lead to sexual sins, that lead to abortion as a cover-up or supposed remedy.

    Let us go on and look at the word translated "good" -- transliterated agathos. I was somewhat taken aback with what this word means. I was expecting some profound meaning of "good" involving God's power, perhaps. But, just as surprisingly mundane as our word for evil is our word here for good:

    1. of good constitution or nature
    2. useful, salutary
    3. good, pleasant, agreeable, joyful, happy
    4. excellent, distinguished
    5. upright, honourable


    We are to avoid being overcome by evil not merely by the Lord's power -- though other Scriptures tell us to rely upon His strength -- but through ordinary mundane goodness: by being useful, by that which is good, pleasant, and agreeable, by being honorable and by simple happiness.

    So what can we do to apply this to fighting abortion?

    It seems, first of all, that we are to be good ourselves -- to refrain from getting entangled in even petty evil.

    Then, we are to be useful. Are we helping our neighbor?

    We are to be pleasant, agreeable, joyful folk, of good cheer. This one can be tough when you're seeing how horrible abortion is -- the slaughtered children, the wounded and distraught mothers. "The joy of the Lord is our strength", though. We can pray for the power of good cheer in the face of darkness. And it's possible. Betsy ten Boom managed to shine light around her even in a Nazi prison, with simple good cheer and little homey touches that made the cell a pleasant as possible place for the women who shared it with her. Remember that there is spiritual and practical value in merely keeping your own spirits up, and bolstering the spirits of those around you. And in this battle, it's of practical import as well. A cheered woman is one who is feeling hope, and she is not as likely to get suckered in by evil and wind up on the abortion table.

    Again, these Scripture studies aren't meant to be exhaustive, merely to provide a bit of something to chew on.

    1858: Promised wedding, given abortion

    The mysterious death of a young lady ... has been undergoing a rigid examination before the proper authorities in Poughkeepsie, and has resulted in exposing one of the most diabolical outrages ever committed of the like in this city.


    Jemima Beneway was described as an "unfortunate young girl who has ben the victim of her seducer", from "most respectable parents", and "highly esteemed by a large circle of friends".

    Over the previous year, she'd had a suitor, a young man named John Olmstead. The couple became engaged, and a wedding scheduled for February. Olmstead told Jemima's parents that he wanted to take her to his parents' home in Connecticut for the wedding. They agreed, and at half-past nine on February 4, 1858, Jemima's happy friends and parents fondly saw the couple off at the train station, heading for New York City.

    Since Jemima's name is consistently given as Beneway, not Olmstead, and Olmstead was referred to as Jemima's "lover", not her husband, it appears that the wedding never actually took place.

    The couple arrived in New York and checked into a hotel, but stayed the night with Jemima's cousin in Brooklyn. When they returned to New York City the next day, Jemima took ill suddenly, "and was carried into the office of an alleged abortionist named Milton W. Gray .... From the evidence before the coroner, it is shown that all things were prepared for her reception, and after a short time she was conveyed by her lover and Dr. Gray to No. 218 Grand street, where a most nefarious and brutal abortion was produced, resulting in her death one week from the time she entered this den."

    The coroner's jury came to the conclusion that Jemima had died on February 13 from an abortion performed by Gray, with Olmstead as an accessory before the fact. Gray was arrested, and a reward of $500 offered for the capture of Olmstead, who had fled.



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    1929: Midwife abortion proves fatal for Chicago woman

    Anna Fazio, age 20, underwent an illegal abortion performed about February 2, 1929, at the Chicago home of midwife Marie Zwienczak. Anna died on February 13.

    Zwienczak was arrested March 1, as recommended by the coroner. Stephanie Paczkiewicz was booked on February 23 as an accessory, but was not mentioned in the verdict. Zwienczak was indictedfor homicide by a grand jury. She was tried, and was sentenced on June 20 to 14 years at Joliet Penitentiary. She appealed, but her sentence was affirmed by the Supreme Court.



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    Thursday, February 12, 2009

    Roundup: Demographic winter, Screwtape on stage, and more

  • Sycloria Williams tells of the day her baby, Shanice, was born alive in a Florida abortion mill, bagged up, and tossed in the trash.



  • Victim of (statutory) rape and forced abortion speaks out.

  • Pregnancy care = Abortions.

  • 11 States Consider Requiring Ultrasound before Abortion: "Abortion foes have a new tactic: The hope that women can't look away."

  • Red Envelope Project Tells President Obama of Outrage over Abortion Promotion

  • Invite Others to View Images: "“I have been a pro abortion catholic… After seeing the pictures of what it exactly was, I nearly cried thinking I supported this awful murder. I ask Jesus my Christ to forgive my past way of thinking. I finally “get it.” This is pure murder. I pray that more people will get to know what it is they are supporting.”
  • Submit your proposal, get your life-saving project funded

    I"m passing this along verbatim from Jill Stanek

    Gerard Health Foundation, which was the sponsor of the Life Prizes Awards, has issued the following:

    REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS


    The sole objective of the Gerard Health Foundation, a private charity founded and funded by Raymond and Marilyn Ruddy, is "saving lives."

    We want to fund projects that save the most lives for the least amount of dollars.

    If you are interested in responding to this request for proposals please submit 1-3 pages maximum telling us the following:

  • How many lives you can save?

  • What will you do to save these lives?

  • On what basis (scientific research, past experience, etc.) do you believe these many lives can be saved?

  • How many dollars you need to accomplish your objective?

    Please respond by March 31, 2009 to Jack Malloy at JMalloy@Gerardhealth.org.


  • I'd suggest doing some research into what have been the most effective approaches, and building on their strengths. Is there a sidewalk counsellor with an impressive history of saves? Is there a CPC that is particularly effective in reaching abortion-minded women? Has an ad campaign shown effectiveness? Then get to it!

    Today's Scripture: Ephesians 5:11

    I'm just going to provide a scripture with some of the original Greek, to provide food for thought. I'll add my own comments as well. This isn't meant to be exhaustive, just to give something to chew on spiritually.

    Ephesians 5:11, in multiple translations, of which I'll keep a few that phrase it a bit differently:


    International Standard Version (©2008)
    and have nothing to do with the unfruitful works that darkness produces. Instead, expose them for what they are.

    New American Standard Bible (©1995)
    Do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but instead even expose them;

    King James Bible
    And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.

    Bible in Basic English
    And have no company with the works of the dark, which give no fruit, but make their true quality clear;

    Weymouth New Testament
    Have nothing to do with the barren unprofitable deeds of darkness, but, instead of that, set your faces against them;

    Young's Literal Translation
    and have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of the darkness and rather even convict,


    The key ideas here are:

  • The phrase translated in the King James as "have fellowship with" -- sugkoinwnevw: to become a partaker together with others, or to have fellowship with a thing. It comes from the bases sun, translated "with", from a root indicating union; and koinoneo, "to come into communion or fellowship with, to become a sharer, be made a partner".

  • The word translated in the NAS as "deeds" -- transliterated ergon:

    1. business, employment, that which any one is occupied
    a. that which one undertakes to do, enterprise, undertaking
    2. any product whatever, any thing accomplished by hand, art, industry, or mind
    3. an act, deed, thing done: the idea of working is emphasised in opp. to that which is less than work

    Boy, ain't THAT a kicker when you're looking at abortion as a deed of darkness! Business, employment.

  • The word translated as "unfruitful" -- akarpos: metaph. without fruit, barren, not yielding what it ought to yield. You could preach an entire sermon on how this word fits abortion. Aside, of course, for the literal barrenness that's being chosen at the moment. Abortion was supposed to usher in a utopia, in which all children were "wanted", none were abused, women were happy and fulfilled. Instead we see poverty, child abuse, domestic violence, drug abuse... Not the glorious Age of Enlightenment abortion was supposed to bring us by a long shot.

  • The word translated as "darkness" -- skotos: This is the same word translated as "darkness" in a recent scripture, "For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places." Let's look at the many ways it's defined:

    1. darkness
    a. of night darkness (I'm assuming this is metaphorical in this context, and not an admonition not to be a night watchman!)
    b. of darkened eyesight or blindness (or inability to see, as exhibited in those who can look at a fetus and not see the baby)
    2. metaph.
    a. of ignorance respecting divine things and human duties, and the accompanying ungodliness and immorality, together with their consequent misery in hell (Whoa!)
    b. persons in whom darkness becomes visible and holds sway

    Again, enough meat for a sermon. The darkness is unable to see any hope in the pregnant woman's circumstances, unable to see the value of her unborn child's life, unable to see her love for the child and her wish for another way but this.

    So that's the first half -- what we are to avoid.

    But what are we to do?

    Let's look:

  • The word translated "instead" or "rather" -- mallon: more, to a greater degree, rather; much, by far; rather, sooner; more willingly, more readily, sooner. So we're not just seeing an alternative, but an alternative that indicates a far stronger rejection of the other alternative. This isn't "paper or plastic" here.

  • The word translated "reprove" in the King James -- transliterated elegcho: They really go to town on this one:

    1. to convict, refute, confute
    a. generally with a suggestion of shame of the person convicted
    b. by conviction to bring to the light, to expose
    2. to find fault with, correct
    a. by word
    1. to reprehend severely, chide, admonish, reprove
    2. to call to account, show one his fault, demand an explanation
    b. by deed
    1. to chasten, to punish

    There's a whole nother sermon there, isn't there?

    It's my prayer that this post really gets folks thinking.

    And -- reference the ongoing "incrementalist versus absolutist" battle -- What the incrementalists are doing is far from fruitless. We have statistical analysis showing that these measures produce real fruit in the lives of real women, sparing them the burden of abortion and sparing their children's lives. They expose the deeds of darkness -- informed consent laws reveal the truth of abortion's purported "safety", the truth that the woman is far from alone and abortion is far from her only option, the truth about what it is an abortion destroys; ultrasound laws bring to light very clearly that what an abortion destroys is not mere tissue; safety regulations highlight the quackery that goes on, endangering women's lives in the name of protecting them.

    Lots to see here. Lots to reflect on and pray over.
  • Where is your niche?

    Eileen Smith tells the story of how she lost her daughter, Laura, and how she has been called to account for her own longtime failure to fight abortion.





    Eileen calls upon us all to pray for "a life consciousness" and to be shown what we are to do.

    Some people have found their niches. They were called upon to offer solace and hope to parents facing a grave prenatal diagnosis for their child. They were called upon to provide help and support to pregnant women at risk for abortion. They were called upon to shine the light of truth on their local abortion mill.

    Not everybody will be called to the same thing. Some will have a calling on a local level, some on a state level, some on a national level, some on an international level. Some will be called to quieter activities such as fasting and prayer. Some will be called to attention-grabbing activities such as rallies and billboards. Some will be called to immediate rescue, working outside abortion mills. Some will be called to long-term battle, to have protections in place in law for when Roe falls. Some are called to inch laws ever so slowly closer to protecting life. Some will be called to fight for dramatic change in the law, to enshrine the dignity of life in law. Some will be called to fight the remaining scourge of illegal abortion -- for law alone will not stop abortion, but will only limit it. Some will be called to contribute more money, some more time, some more sacrifice. But everybody is called in some way, as Ephesians 5: 11 says: "Do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but instead even expose them"

    Where is your niche?

    1923: A typical "back-alley" abortion death

    Dr. A.B.C. Davis maintained an office, operating rooms, and rooms with beds for patients in Oklahoma City. Mary Sudik and her husband, Ernest Sudik, lived some miles southeast of Oklahoma City, on a truck farm. Early in February, 1923, Mary Sudik found out that she was pregnant, and that she and her husband asked around for an abortionist and were referred to Davis.

    On February 10th they went to Davis' office, and he assured them that he could perform a safe abortion, named his price, took his money, then performed the abortion. Mary developed a fatal infection. Mr. Sudik went to Davis and told him of Mary's death. Davis said he was sorry and offered Sudik money to help defray funeral expenses. Sudik at first declined, instead going to the county attorney to report Davis's treatment of Mary. The county attorney told him to go back to Davis and take the proffered money. When Mr. Sudik returned, Davis gave him $50, but first made him sign the following statement:

    Oklahoma City, Okla., Feb. 20, 1923.

    This will exonerate Dr. A.B.C. Davis from any blame concerning the illness or death of my wife, Mary Sudik, on February 12, 1923, near Moore, Oklahoma.

    Ernest Sudik.

    Witness Gus Sudik.


    Mr. Sudik then returned to the county attorney's office and turned over the money Davis had given him, and a warrant of arrest was issued. A deputy sheriff went to Davis's office and arrested him. At the time of the arrest the officer seized a large quantity of ergot and other abortifacients. Immediately after placing the Davis in jail, the officers returned to his office and seized and carried away some instruments and appliances commonly used to perform abortions.

    The officers also seized written statements signed by various women, stating that they agreed to hold Davis blameless for any dangerous or fatal results that might follow his treatment for "operations" performed by themselves or others. Many of the women who had signed these statements later testified that Davis had performed "operations" upon them under circumstances indicating that his practice consisted chiefly in performing abortions. They also testified that Davis insisted that they sign the statements prior to his performing their abortions. One of these witnesses was convalescing from an abortion in one of the beds in the room adjoining the doctor's office at the time of his arrest; another one came there for an "operation" while the premises were being searched by the police.

    Davis admitted that he had treated the women, but denied doing any abortions. He insisted that these women all came to him only for aftercare for abortions performed elsewhere by somebody else. He claimed that this had been the case with Mary Sudik.

    On April 1, 1923, Davis found guilty of the murder of Mary Sudik, accomplished by the use and employment of instruments upon her for the purpose of producing a criminal abortion. The punishment imposed by the jury was imprisonment for life.

    He appealed on many grounds, but the appeal was unsuccessful. He was, however, paroled -- and arrested in 1936 for mail fraud.

    Mary's abortion was typical of criminal abortions in that it was performed by a physician.



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    1974: "Therapeutic" abortion proves fatal for California mother

    Life Dynamics lists 38-year-old Bonnie Fix on their "Blackmun Wall" of women killed by safe, legal abortions. LDI put together the following information on Bonnie's death:

  • Bonnie, a mother of four, was admitted to Fresno Community Hospital on February 7, 1974.
  • Doctors there performed an abdominal hysterectomy on Bonnie, removing her uterus along with her unborn baby.
  • Codes used at the state registrar's office inidcate that an abortion had been induced on Bonnie for medical reasons.
  • Several days after her hysterectomy, Bonnie began to suffer bowel and lung problems.
  • She suffered cardiac arrest and was pronounced dead on February 12.

    We don't know enough about Bonnie's case to know if the baby was killed as an unfortunate side-effect of a medically necessary hysterectomy -- say, for aggressive uterine cancer -- or if Bonnie and/or her doctor just thought an abortion was the easiest thing to do in her case and used a medical condition as justification. The fact that such a drastic method as hysterectomy was chosen tends to support the former, but Bonnie's age and the propensity at the time for abortionists to do the most drastic of surgeries as a matter of course -- in many cases as fertility control -- tends to support the latter.

    For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:



    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.
  • Wednesday, February 11, 2009

    Today's scripture: 2 Chronicles 25:3

    I'll expand today on a scripture I addressed back in 2001:

    2 Chronicles 25:3 "...The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, or the children be put to death for the fathers..."

    I most often cite this scripture as a response to the argument that abortion is justified if the pregnancy was the result of rape or incest -- though I don't think such abortions can be justified by a secular perspective, either. Killing the family members of people who have wronged you is the act of a mafioso, not something to be enshrined in law.

    But here I am specifically addressing people of faith. When you're tempted to hem and haw and concede "hard cases", think what you're saying -- that it's okay to put an unborn child to death because his or her father committed a rape.

    And this goes even further than rape or incest. Women are often driven to the abortion table by the men in their lives. These women, likewise, are having the children put to death for the sins of the fathers, be the sin abandonment, abuse, or just plain being an unsupportive jerk. Or -- the most common sin leading to abortion -- if they are just fornicators. Should an act of fornication committed by your father mean that you get the death penalty?

    "Well," you might object, "that's easy for you to say. You're not the woman in that situation, coping with that man."

    No, I'm not. And I'm not saying that it's easy. And what I'm about to say applies to women of faith, not to unbelievers.

    You are the steward of your body and of its awesome power to take part in the creation of new life. The time to avoid the sin of abortion is, first of all, when you're tempted into sexual sin. I can recommend Dawn Eden's excellent book, The Thrill of the Chaste, as a starting point for how to avoid sexual sins that so often lead Christian women to compound their initial sin with the additional sin of abortion.

    But what if you, or your girlfriend, your friend or sister or daughter, is already pregnant through sexual sin. Scriptures are clear: You are not to put the child to death for the sins of the parents -- whether as punishment or as a cover-up. And you can't cover up the sin from the people most intimately involved: Yourself and God.

    The believer will not only shun abortion herself, but will not counsel such for a friend or relative. The remedy for sin isn't more sin; it's repentance. It's a turning away from the sin and back to God. And that's always a painful process. But here's an interesting thing I just discovered.

    I checked an online concordance for the Hebrew translated "repent" -- and found this (emphasis mine):

    to be sorry, console oneself, repent, regret, comfort, be comforted
    (Niphal)
    to be sorry, be moved to pity, have compassion
    to be sorry, rue, suffer grief, repent
    to comfort oneself, be comforted
    to comfort oneself, ease oneself
    (Piel) to comfort, console
    (Pual) to be comforted, be consoled
    (Hithpael)
    to be sorry, have compassion
    to rue, repent of
    to comfort oneself, be comforted
    to ease oneself


    It is through repentance, not through covering up sin, that we find comfort and consolation.

    All of which has fried my brain.

    Should this kid be allowed in the ceremony?

    Special needs senior can't be in commencement, GPS says

    A teen with special needs wants to be with the kids he grew up with when the graduate. He's been attending school with them, has been doing is own work -- but since he won't actually complete his academic work to graduate until four years from now, the school district says he can't participate.

    They fear it would open the door to kids who failed in some way -- flunked a class, failed a test -- to get to go through the graduation ceremony. But those kids did or failed to do something to disqualify them. All this kid is guilty of is needing more time.

    His classmates want him there with them.

    Surely they could find a way for him to participate. Have him hand the diplomas to whoever hands them out. Let him shake each classmate's hand after they get their diploma. Surely they can come up with some way to include this kid.

    If I was one of his classmates, I'd give serious thought to boycotting the commencement, holding a private ceremony elsewhere with friends where they went through all the motions, then got their diplomas in the mail.

    This kid did everything that was expected from him to the best of his abilities. I say he belongs on stage with his classmates.

    What say you?

    Old Calvin and Hobbes strip totally NAILS the bailout!

    Here it is!

    HT: Greg Mankiw's Blog via Fark.

    Amazing new site!

    Voices for Women provides vital information focusing on two abortionists and their mills:

  • Hodari/Womancare: this is the guy who killed Tamiia Russell and Chivon Williams -- and, as I've just learned from Voices for Women, Regina Johnson and an unnamed 17-year-old girl.

    This is what Voices for Women has about Regina Johnson: Patient suffered respiratory/cardiac arrest following her abortion. Clinic failed to assist her or call for an ambulance. Oxygen was deprived for an extended period of time. She died shortly after.

    This is what they have on the unnamed patient: 17yr old girl died in October 2007 as a result of abortion related causes the day after obtaining an abortion at Womancare of Downriver/Southgate. At the time of her death, her parents did not know she had ever been pregnant let alone had an abortion.

    I have asked them for their documents so that I can add these young women to the Cemetery of Choice.

  • Reginald Sharpe

    They also provide a page that provides the latest news about their local abortionists.

    Every abortionist in America should have somebody holding their feet to the fire like this, documenting their past and tracking their current activities. They should have no place to hide from public scrutiny of the evil that they do.
  • Abortion enthusiast (unwittingly) calls for de-funding of Planned Parenthood!

    Okay, she didn't say so directly, but she did flat out say that organizations that operate the way we know Planned Parenthood does ought not to get a dime of taxpayer money:

    “We’re not going to ever step up to the plate and accept that health centers that mislead women should get any federal money,” Page said.

    Page was, predictably, attacking prolife pregnancy centers. But if we take her at her word -- that what she really objects to is health centers misleading women, this would mean in practice, of course, that PP ought not to get any federal money.

    Why not? What women did PP mislead? Well:

  • They misled Holly Patterson into thinking they dispensed abortion drugs in a safe manner.

  • They misled Diana Lopez into believing that her abortion would be performed safely.

  • They misled Andrea Corey into believing that they were referring her to a safe facility.

  • They misled Sherri, telling her that her 8-week unborn child was just "like a blood clot".

  • They misled Christi Stile into thinking that they were referring her to a safe facility.

  • The misled Lauren into thinking they had aborted both of her twins.

  • They misled multiple women into thinking that Inglewood Women's Clinic was a safe, reputable facility.

  • They misled Bangladeshi rape victims into thinking that Harvey Karman was a respected professional capable of performing safe abortions on them, when he was in fact using them as lab rats for an experimental abortion technique involving plastic springs and balsa wood.

  • They misled patients at Planned Parenthood of Mid Michigan.

  • They misled patients at Planned Parenthood of Central and Northern Arizona

    And let's not forget the hoax the perpetrated while trying to get CPCs defunded.

    Et cetera ad nauseum.

    Just to put it in a nutshell, let's look at the bottom line:

    Women who died because they trusted Planned Parenthood: Edrica Goode, Diana Lopez, Holly Patterson, Vivian Tran, Nichole Williams, Andrea Corey, Sandra Kaiser, Elizabeth Tsuji

    Women who died because they trusted prolife pregnancy centers:






    So, I say again, if misleading women disqualifies one from receiving federal funding, Planned Parenthood needs to be on the top of the list. The most a CPC has been accused of is annoying women who are hell-bent on abortion. Planned Parenthood has actually caused their deaths. Which is the greater threat to women's well-being?

    So! Let's welcome our newfound ally, abortion-embracing author Christina Page, aboard the de-fund Planned Parenthood bandwagon! Does anybody have any contact information?
  • "As long as you're here..."

    During early 1861, a German physician by the name of John H. Joecken was caring for Mr. Malinken, who was ailing in his Brooklyn home. On one of his visits, Malinken's 35-year-old wife, Caroline, approached Joecken privately and told him "she did not want to have so many children, and wished to know if it was possible to get rid of her present burthen. The doctor replied that it was the easiest thing imaginable, and that in eight days all would be over."

    Joecken set to work on Caroline, "and by the use of drugs as well as instruments succeeded in making her very sick." Over the course of several days her condition deteriorated. She died late Monday night, February 11.

    The coroner's jury concluded that Caronline had died from "pyemia, supervening upon metritis, consequent of an abortion produced at the hands of Dr. Joecken." Joecken was arrested.

    Caroline's abortion was typical of pre-legalization abortions in that it was performed by a physician.

    In studying pre-legalization deaths, I was surprised at the number of instances I found of doctors and other abortionists blithely assuring patients that abortion would be quite easy and safe. They sounded, to my modern ears, quite indistinguishable from post-legalization abortion proponents, who can not stop trumpeting how fast, easy, safe, and reliable abortion is. The main difference is how long it will allegedly take to restore the woman to her desired non-pregnant state.

    The more things change, the more they stay the same.



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    1985: The only kind of parental notification the abortion lobby approves of

    They told me I had to get down to St. Luke's right away, that Dawn was at that hospital fighting for her life.

    It's the call every parent dreads. Ruth Ravenelle was no exception. Her 13-year-old daughter, Dawn, was active in the church where both her parents were ministers. The family sang Gospel songs together. Dawn was a dream child -- the kid who did her homework without being told, who liked to surprise her mother by cleaning the house. She was what's known in the vernacular as "a good girl". Her parents never expected any trouble about Dawn.

    I was going, 'How can she be fighting for her life? She left for school this morning, looking healthy, never been sick.'"

    What Ruth didn't know was that Dawn had slipped off her pedestal, had engaged in a dalliance with a 15-year-old Romeo. And when she learned that she was pregnant, she knew her parents would be crushed. She went to a teacher for advice. The teacher and a counselor arranged to take care of the whole mess so that Dawn's parents would never have to know. The boyfriend borrowed a credit card from a relative to pay for the risky, expensive, second-trimester abortion.

    The counselor at Eastern Women's Center (a National Abortion Federation member) had seen how frightened Dawn was, and had marked on her chart that she should be treated with "tender loving care". But abortionist Alan Kline had his own ideas about what constituted "tender loving care". According to the suit filed by Dawn's parents, he didn't administer enough anesthesia to get the frightened girl through the entire procedure. She began to cough, vomit, and choke. Kline put a breathing tube in Dawn's throat, put her aside, and left her unattended to lapse into a coma. Dawn was eventually rushed to the hospital, where it finally occurred to somebody to do the obvious: call Dawn's mother.

    While I was there at the hospital -- they were doing tests -- I had to keep my hand pressed over my mouth to keep from screaming in horror. I kept going, 'This is all a bad dream. I am going to wake up and this will not have happened.'"

    Day after day Dawn's family gathered at her bedside, talking to her, playing tapes of the family singing together, trying to lure her back from the brink of death -- all to no avail. Dawn died three weeks after her abortion, on February 11, 1985, without ever having regained consciousness.

    The family sued and won, but as the New York Post headline pointed out, "$1.2M Won't Bring Her Back." The story featured a photo of Dawn at her junior high graduation, in cap and gown, gazing out smiling at a future she would never have.

    And the abortion lobby, interestingly enough, has never thought to object to the kind of parental notification Ruth Ravenelle received -- the phone call to tell her that her daughter was in the hospital, fighting to survive, after the damage was done.

    For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:



    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    Tuesday, February 10, 2009

    Abortion not needed to treat breast cancer

    Study Finds Abortion Not Needed When Pregnant Women Face Cancer Treatment

    This is old news being reiterated, but it never hurts to repeat truth until people start hearing it: You don't need to kill the unborn baby in order to treat the pregnant mother for cancer.

    Dr. Beth Beadle, who works at the prestigious medical center and is the lead author of the study, told AP that both mother and baby can be cared for during treatment.

    "If we can get them early, we can treat them aggressively and have good and promising outcomes for both woman and child," she said.

    ....

    Ruth O'Regan, an associate professor at Emory University's Winship Cancer Institute in Atlanta, also told AP that cancer doctors can treat both mother and child without the need for an abortion.

    "It's quite complicated, but all of us have been able to treat pregnant women successfully," O'Regan said.


    This is good news for the vast majority of women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy, but bad news for people casting about for reasons to justify abortion.

    Abortion and Scripture: Ephesians 6:12 - Identify the Enemy

    For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places. -- Ephesians 6:12 NAS

    When it comes to the abortion battle, it seems the lines are drawn pretty clearly: prolife vs. prochoice. No matter which side you align yourself with, it's easy to tell who is friend and who is foe, right? If you're prolife, the prochoicers are the enemy. If you're prochoice, the prolifers are the enemy. Right?

    Well, it might be possible to put forth that argument from a purely secular perspective (although I don't think it holds water even from a secular perspective). But from a Christian perspective, the idea that this is a war of prolife versus prochoice -- or even "good guys" versus "bad guys" -- is bogus.

    The Bible makes it pretty clear who the Enemy is. We can explore this Enemy at length at another time. Right now, we'll look closely at Ephesians 6:12, as a reminder of who the enemy is not:
    For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places.

    Let's turn to the Greek Lexicon and see what we can find about the words used in this passage.

    We can start with the Greek word transliterated "pale" (pal ay). This word is used only in this passage, and means "wrestling (a contest between two in which each endeavours to throw the other, and which is decided when the victor is able to hold his opponent down with his hand upon his neck); the term is transferred to the Christian's struggle with the power of evil." So it looks like we're not talking about a "live and let live" situation, in which our Enemy will let us be if we ignore it. We're engaged in a wrestling match in which one, and only one, can emerge victorious.

    We can then look at the Greek words transliterated "sarx," indicating "flesh (the soft substance of the living body, which covers the bones and is permeated with blood)...used of natural or physical origin, ...denotes mere human nature, the earthly nature of man apart from divine influence, and therefore prone to sin and opposed to God;" and "haima" (hah ee ma), "blood." We can take this then pretty literally -- we're not fighting flesh and blood, mortal creatures, men and women like ourselves.

    Well, then, what are we fighting? Here's where it really gets interesting.

    The word translated here as "powers" is the Greek transliterated "exousia" (ex oo see ah). Here are some of the ways this word is defined:
    • power of choice, liberty of doing as one pleases
    • physical and mental power
    • the ability or strength with which one is endued, which he either possesses or exercises
      the power of authority (influence) and of right (privilege)
    • the power of rule or government (the power of him whose will and commands must be submitted to by others and obeyed)
    • the leading and more powerful among created beings superior to man, spiritual potentates

    I find it fascinating that Paul chose this word here, a word that means not just those in authority or those with power, but free will itself. Although this idea is not, I would presume, the crux of the passage, I think we'd do well to remember that our own free will is often ready to trip us up. The very capacity for making choices which the abortion advocates hold up as the ultimate good seems here cast as a potential pitfall. This stands as a warning to all Christians no matter what side of the abortion battle they've stationed themselves on: just because we can does not mean we should. Having been given free will, and the power to make choices, we are given at every moment of our lives the capacity to rebel against God and set ourselves up as petty tyrants over our own lives and the lives of those around us.

    Again, though, this is an interesting side concept. Biblical scholars point to the meaning of this word in this passage as focusing on spiritual powers having control in the world, and over people.

    "World forces of this darkness" is a concept built of three words:

    The word translated as "world forces" is transliterated "kosmokrator." This word is used only in this passage, and means "lord of the world, prince of this age; the devil and his demons."

    The word translated as "darkness" is transliterated "skotos," meaning "darkness of night; darkness of darkened eyesight or blindness; metaphorically of ignorance respecting divine things and human duties, and the accompanying ungodliness and immorality, together with their consequent misery in hell; persons in whom darkness becomes visible and holds sway."

    We can pull this together into a picture of Satan and the way he works in the world, where he has dominion. Note also, that the word translated "darkness" can refer to "persons in whom darkness becomes visible and holds sway," this doens't indicate that these persons themselves are that which we are fighting, but the darkness that is being manifested in them. This is, perhaps, a fancy way of restating, "Hate the sin, love the sinner."

    The third concept of what we are fighting is translated here, "spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places."

    The word translated "spiritual" is transliterated "pneumatikos," and translates as "sprit." The specific meaning that fits in this passage is "belonging to a spirit, or a being higher than man but inferior to God."

    The word translated as "wickedness" is transliterated "poneria," meaning "depravity, iniquity, wickedness; malice; evil purposes and desires." That's pretty straightforward.

    The word translated "heavenly" is transliterated "epouranios," which translates pretty much into our current "heavenly." We tend to think of "heavenly" as meaning "good," or "superior," but in this passage it can't be indicitave of anything good or superior, and therefore must designate that we're talking about a spiritual realm, a higher reality, and not the physical world visible around us. This stands in contrast to what this passage says we do not contend against, i.e. "flesh and blood," or worldly enemies.

    This is not meant to be the final word on how we can apply this passage, either in our lives or as we struggle to put an end to abortion. But it's certainly a start.

    1957: Abortion by veterinarian proves fatal

    On February 10, 1957, veterinarian Ira Ledbetter performed an abortion on Alice Kimberly. Ledbetter used a veterinary instrument called a milk tube on Alice, causing lacerations and an embolism. She quickly died of her injuries, leaving her husband with five minor children to raise alone.

    Alice's abortion was unusual in that it was not preformed by a physician, as was by far the most typical scenario. Still, it was performed by somebody with medical training, which was unusual but still more common than amateur or self-induced abortions.



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    Monday, February 09, 2009

    Call to action: Ask Pro-Life Blogs to nuke Pro-Life News

    Pro-Life News is bearing false witness in its headlines again:



    The deliberately slanderous headline reads: "11 states consider murdering babies after ultrasound pictures are taken"

    As Christians, we are often called upon to reprove our brothers and sisters. The editor of Pro-Life News does not allow comments so that we can chide him personally or privately. He slanders his brothers and sisters in public, and he needs to be taken down a notch in public.

    This brother's actions are designed to tear others down, to deliberately attack brothers and sisters who are working to limit the carnage, deliberately misrepresenting them. Again, this is bearing false witness -- the breaking of a Commandment -- on a deliberate and ongoing basis. If we do a study of how the word translated "violence" is used in Scripture, this brother is daily and deliberately committing violence against brothers and sisters. Read Hebrew Words and Abortion, Part II. Let me share a portion:

    The next word for "violence" is "chamac," meaning "to wrong, do violence to, treat violently, do wrongly (Qal); to treat violently, do wrong; of physical wrong; of ethical wrong; of physical and ethical wrong (Niphal); to be treated violently." This is a primative root word used 8 times in the Old Testament, and translated (KJV) as violence (2 times), violated (1), shake off (1), wrongfully imagine (1), violently taken away (1), wronged (1), and made bare (1). Example are:

  • Proverbs 8:36
    But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all they that hate me love death. (KJV)

  • Jeremiah 22:3
    Thus saith the LORD; Execute ye judgment and righteousness, and deliver the spoiled out of the hand of the oppressor: and do no wrong, do no violence to the stranger, the fatherless, nor the widow, neither shed innocent blood in this place. (KJV)

  • Zephaniah 3:4
    Her prophets are light and treacherous persons: her priests have polluted the sanctuary, they have done violence to the law. (KJV)

    Another word, also transliterated "chamac," means "violence, wrong, cruelty, injustice." It is used a total of 60 times in the Old Testament, translated as violence (39 times), violent (7), cruelty (4), wrong (3), false (2), cruel (1), damage (1), injustice (1), oppressor (1), and unrighteous (1). Examples are (all KJV):

  • Genesis 6:11
    The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence.

  • Genesis 49:5
    Simeon and Levi are brethren; instruments of cruelty are in their habitations.

  • Psalms 72:14
    He shall redeem their soul from deceit and violence: and precious shall their blood be in his sight.

  • Jonah 3:8
    But let man and beast be covered with sackcloth, and cry mightily unto God: yea, let them turn every one from his evil way, and from the violence that is in their hands.

    The final word used in the Old Testament to indicate "violence" is transliterated "m@rutsah," meaning "crushing, oppression:"

  • Jeremiah 22:17
    But thine eyes and thine heart are not but for thy covetousness, and for to shed innocent blood, and for oppression, and for violence, to do it.

    I'm beginning to see a pattern here, in that violence is indeed condemned roundly by God -- but that "violence" encompasses not just what we'd think of as a direct physical assault, but also any assault upon the integrity of a person or God's law. This includes taking away anything from another person -- posessions, reputation, dignity.


  • The editor of Pro-Life News is committing this sin against brothers and sisters regularly, publicly, daily, deliberately. This is not an occasional slip of the tongue or misunderstanding. This is deliberate and daily wrongdoing against brothers and sisters. This brother needs to be expelled from the fellowship until he repents. You can email the moderator of Pro Life Blogs at prolifeblogs@gmail.com, or contact him or her through the contact form.

    Things like this are a huge part of the spiritual battle. We must keep our own house clean. We often slander our opponents -- saying that they are deliberately committing murder when we do not know how it is they actually view their actions. That is probably a huge part of why God allows the outrage of abortion to continue -- to teach us how to do battle. To teach us to identify the enemy. And we are joining forces with the real Enemy when we resort to Satan's methods of dealing with those we disagree with. Satan is, I'm sure, quite delighted when any brother or sister tries to fight the breaking of one Commandment (against murder) with habitual breaking of another (against bearing false witness).

    And I can hear the squeals of outrage: "How dare you compare a few words typed on a keyboard to the deliberate slaughter of innocent unborn children!?" Well, I'll reply in advance that I'm not the one making the comparison. God is. He had a reason for putting covetousness and slander on the same list with murder. Are we going to trust Him to recognize evil or not?

    In closing I will quote C. S. Lewis, from Mere Christianity:

    It is a terrible thing that the worst of all the vices can smuggle itself into the very centre of our religious life. But you can see why. The other, and less bad, vices come from the devil working on us through our animal nature. But this does not come through our animal nature at all It comes direct from Hell. It is purely spiritual: consequently it is far more subtle and deadly. For the same reason, Pride can often be used to beat down the simpler vices. Teachers, in fact, often appeal to a boy's Pride, or, as they call it, his self-respect, to make him behave decently: many a man has overcome cowardice, or lust, or ill-temper by learning to think that they are beneath his dignity-that is, by Pride. The devil laughs. He is perfectly content to see you becoming chaste and brave and self-controlled provided, all the time, he is setting up in you the Dictatorship of Pride-just as he would be quite content to see your chilblains cured if he was allowed, in return, to give you cancer. For Pride is spiritual cancer: it eats up the very possibility of love, or contentment, or even common sense.


    I might add that Satan is no doubt delighted to see you battle abortion as long as you do it by committing slander, bearing false witness, and puffing yourself up with the sin of Pride. And prolifers are very, very prone to this: to saying, "Yeah, I do this bad thing, but at least I'm not killing babies!" Well, for the most part, abortion is a very carnal sin. (Only the "Abortion as a Sacrifice to Artemis" types embrace it as a spiritual sin.) Fighting it by puffing yourself up with Pride is a spiritual sin. Which one was Jesus more likely to take a sinner to the woodshed over? He was far more gentle on the Woman Caught in Adultery than he was with the puffed-up religious leaders who congratulated themselves daily on how much more holy they were than the woman in question.

    And I have been remiss in not couching the battle regularly in spiritual terms, and in not calling Scriptures to play on a regular basis. I'm guilty of fostering this cancer by not taking great care in how I address others' motives myself.

    Sunday, February 08, 2009

    Retroactively legal, still as fatal

    At 9:00 in the morning, February 8, 1968, 19-year-old Nancy Ward, a student at the University of Oklahoma, died in the ear, nose, and throat clinic of Dr. Richard Mucie of Kansas City, Missouri. The chain of events that cost Nancy her life had begun in November of 1967, when Nancy had told her boyfriend that she was pregnant and wanted an abortion. The boyfriend contacted his father in Kansas City for help. On January 30, 1968, the boyfriend's father contacted Dr. Richard Mucie at his ear, nose, and throat clinic and made arrangements for the abortion.

    On February 7, Nancy and her boyfriend flew from Oklahoma to Kansas City and boyfriend visited Mucie at clinic. Mucie examined Nancy and told the couple that he would contact them at their hotel. At 11 p.m., Mucie called and arranged to pick them up and drive them to his clinic. He took Nancy back for the back room while the boyfriend waited in the outer office. About 20 to 30 minutes later, Mucie returned to the front office and asked the boyfriend for money before starting the procedure. Evidence indicates that Mucie then performed a D&C abortion on Nancy.

    During the abortion, Mucie made a 1/2 inch tear in Nany's uterus. She went into shock and died at the clinic at about 9 a.m. February 8, in spite of Mucie's attempts to resucitate her. At about 11:30 a.m., Nancy's body was taken to Osteopathic hosptal. An autopsy revealed parts of a 4 1/2 to five month fetus still in Nancy's uterus. She had bled to death.

    Mucie was convicted on June 8, 1968, of performing an abortion "not necessary to preserve the life" of the mother. Illegal abortion at that time carried a penalty of 3-5 years, with the sentence to be increased in cases where the mother died. Mucie served 14 months then was released on parole. Parole was set to expire on July 27, 1977. His medical license was revoked on May 4, 1971. After Roe v. Wade overturned Missouri's abortion law, Mucie successfully appealed his conviction and got his license restored under a ruling that made Roe retroactive in Missouri. He was released from propation and his record expunged of the manslaughter-abortion convicted. Ironically, Nancy's fatal abortion was retroactively declared legal on the grounds that the state's "interest in materal health" did not allow Missouri to have prohibited Mucie from performing it.

    Robert Dale Crist, who would later go on to kill three of his own abortion patients, was one of the people who testified in Mucie's behalf to get his conviction thrown out and his license restored.

    Nancy's abortion was typical of illegal abortions in that it was performed by a physician.

    For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:



    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    Saturday, February 07, 2009

    Anniversary: Shanda's abortion nightmare

    I believe that if a woman decides to have a termination, it should be done safely, legally and with some dignity. -- P. Scott Ricke


    "Shanda" was 25 years old when she went to Ricke for an abortion on February 7, 1987 at his Women's Surgical Clinic in Arizona.

    During the abortion, Shanda said, the head of the fetus became lodged. She was screaming in pain, but Ricke refused her request for painkillers by telling her that he didn't have any. She asked to be taken to a hospital, but Ricke told her that since her pregnancy was more than 24 weeks along, beyond the 24 week limit most hospitals observed, no hospital would take her.

    Ricke made as many as 40 unsuccessful attempts to start an IV, and asked Shanda for advice about how to deal with the lodged head (wanting her to decide if crushing the head would be the right course of action).

    After three hours of attempts to remove the head, Ricke wrapped the body of the fetus -- which was hanging out of Shanda's vagina -- in a towel, and loaded Shanda into an employee's car to be transported to the hospital.

    The Assistant Arizona Attorney General investigated the case, and asserted that during the three hours he spent trying to dislodge Shanda's fetus, Ricke left her several times to do other abortions. After packing Shanda into a private car for transport, Ricke remained behind at his clinic to do three more abortions before following Shanda to the hospital and completing her abortion there.

    The Assistant Attorney General said that by attempting to abort a 28-week, 2.4-pound fetus in this manner, he failed to minimize risks and jeopardized Shanda's health. Ricke's attorney countered that the fetus was only 24 weeks old, and that it had a less than 50% chance of survival. Ricke was disciplined by the medical board.

    Why the sudden interest?

    Suddenly the blogosphere is abuzz about little Shanice Williams, the baby killed after she was born alive in a Florida abortion mill.

    My blog was flooded with a massive amount of visitors since the MSM started covering the story. Searches for Belkis Gonzalez, Sycloria Williams, and variations on "baby born alive and thrown away" have brought my page views to an all-time high:




    Shanice is hardly the first baby deliberately put to death for the unforgivable sin of surviving an abortion attempt. In fact, given what we know of how many abortionists are selling late abortions, the survival chances of preemies, how easy it is to miscalculate gestational ages, how slovenly abortion practitioners often are, and how abortion laws are enforced, we also know this: the sort of thing that happened in that Florida clinic is literally an everyday occurrence.

    Why this sudden massive interest in something that happens every day?

    Is it because Shanice was given a name, rather than just being "a baby" or "a fetus that survived an abortion"?

    Is it because of the biohazard bag?

    Is it because she was tossed on the roof?

    Is it because she was actively killed instead of just abandoned to die of neglect?

    Why is there so much more interest in Shanice's brief life and cruel death than in so many other children who survived a prenatal attempt on their lives, only to be finished off by the people who had, after all, been paid to kill them?

    For more on just how ordinary what happened to Shanice is, see:

  • A Question About Live Born Babies and Criminal Charges
  • Barack Obama and the Born-Alive Babies
  • Born Alive
  • Jesse Floyd: Murder charge, flushing fetuses, assault and racial slurs
  • Jill Stanek and FactCheck's Faulty "Facts"
  • More Born Alive Babies
  • More Born-Alive Babies and Their Fates
  • Obama Coments. I Respond.
  • Planned Parenthood Admits to Live Births
  • Pro-Choice, Pro-Child? Baby Rowan
  • "This Baby Won't Stop Breathing!"

  • Friday, February 06, 2009

    1952: Serviceman rushes home to dying wife's bedside

    On February 6, 1952, Elizabeth Barbara "Betty" Hellman, the 35-year-old wife of an Air Force Major, died of peritonitis at Tinker Air Force Base Hospital. Her husband, who had been stationed in Tokyo for over a year, had managed to rush home from Tokyo in time to see his wife before she died. Not only did Major Hellman lose his wife, he was met with the additional shock of learning that Betty had been unfaithful during his absence.

    Betty had been admitted to the hospital in critical condition on January 28, suffering from pain and low blood pressure, on January 28. Her red blood count was very low, and her white count very high, indicating infection. She admitted to having undergone an abortion on January 25. An autopsy verified that she had died from peritonitis from an abortion.

    The story came out between Betty's admission to the hospital and her death. When questioned by investigators on January 31, Betty said that friends had referred her to a woman named Jane. She was shown a photo and identified the woman in it, 43-year-old Mrs. Jane McDaniel White, as her abortionist. She gave White's address as the place she had gone for the abortion.

    Betty said that White had put her off for several days while she got over her fear of undergoing the abortion. She promised White $100, but only paid her $50. White initiated the abortion with some kind of packing and sent Betty home.

    Betty became very ill, and called White, who with her daughter came to Betty's home and "scraped her out".

    After Betty gave her statement, police raided White's home. White and her daughter, Mrs. S. B. Anderson, Jr., were nowhere to be found. Police eventually tracked the pair down and arrested them for murder and procuring an abortion.

    White said that Betty had indeed come to her home, asking for Jane, and saying that she thought she was pregnant. White told investigators, "She said she had been taking medicine and she was vomiting. She also said she had been taking white capsules and shots." (Betty said that the medicine and shots had been in anticipation of travel to Japan to join her husband.) She said that Betty had asked who could perform an abortion, and insisted that she'd told Betty she "was not in the business."

    However, White said, she treated Betty for ptomaine poisoning, which she believed was what was causing Betty's vomiting. She admitted to visiting Betty at her home, but said that she had only given her a laxative to treat ptomaine poisoning. White admitted to having no medical training, and said that she "had no right" to diagnoses whether or not Betty was pregnant, but she was qualified to diagnose the ptomaine poisoning because she'd had a bout of it herself.

    The criminal case against White went well until the defense managed to have the Betty's deathbed statement, given on January 31, inadmissible because it couldn't be proved satisfactorily that Betty believed herself to be near death. With the deathbed statement thrown out, the case was dropped.

    This had been White's third arrest for abortion charges. She had been convicted in 1947, under the name Jane McDaniel, and sentenced to seven years, but the conviction was thrown out on a technicality based on how advanced the girl's pregnancy had been. A new trial had been scheduled, but it never took place because the main prosecution witness had left the state or died. White was clearly operating as an abortionist, since an operating table, fashioned from an old restaurant table, and surgical instruments had been sized from her home at the time of her arrest -- â€Å“enough instruments and medicine to stock a small hospital.” She was charged again in 1951 but the main witness had vanished and the case had been dismissed.

    Betty's abortion was unusual in that it was performed by an amateur, rather than by a doctor, as was the case with perhaps 90% of criminal abortions.



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    1987: Abortion, heart failure, death

    Life Dynamics lists 26-year-old Kathy Davis on their "Blackmun Wall" of women killed by safe and legal abortions. Citing Kathy's death certificate, Life Dynamics says that Kathy died at Cleveland Metropolitan General Hospital of heart failure and hypertension following a safe, legal abortion on February 6, 1987.

    For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:



    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    1986: Cream-of-the-crop abortion facility leaves teen dead

    Seventeen-year-old Laniece Dorsey underwent a safe and legal abortion at a Family Planning Associates Medical Group facility in Orange County, California, on February 6, 1986. FPA is a National Abortion Federation member facility.



    Laniece lapsed into a coma, was transferred to a nearby hospital, and died later that day.

    The Orange County Sheriff's Department medical examiner blamed the death on cardiorespiratory arrest due to the anesthesia, although he also found "a thick adherent layer of fibrinous material containing moderate numbers of inflammatory infiltrates" in Laniece's uterus.

    Laniece wasn't the first or last young woman to die from abortion at a facility owned by FPA head honcho Edward Campbell Allred. Others include:

    Allred's facilities remain members of the National Abortion Federation despite these deaths.

    For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:



    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    Thursday, February 05, 2009

    Searches: Sycloria Williams and Belkis Gonzalez

    Sycloria Williams is the young woman now suing a Florida abortion mill. Her baby, who she named Shaniece, was born alive at the clinic. The clinic owner, Belkis Gonzalez, put the baby in a biohazard bag and tossed her on the roof. An anonymous tipster alerted the cops, who eventually found the baby -- leading to the utterly surreal call for an autopsy not to determine just the cause of death, but the very nature of the corpse. Was this a dead baby, or just biomass? You need an expert to discern these things in the post-Roe era.

    Gosh, Barack Obama reassured the people of Illinois that babies just aren't born alive during abortions. That it's a non-issue. The doctors are always very careful not to start abortions on babies that might survive! There's no need for a neonatologist to come see if the baby could survive if it's born alive -- excuse me, if the nonviable tissue that is wrigging and squirming and gasping in your procedure room is actually a baby. Illinois law was very clear on that point -- if the doctor decided before the abortion that it was a nonviable tissue mass, well, then it was, all squirming and gasping and generally acting like a preemie to the contrary. Any nonviable tissue mass that does that -- wiggles and squirms and breathes and gasps -- is just pulling a clever ruse, trying to convince you it's a baby. But it's not! And how do we know? Barack Obama says so! And of course, he never screws up.



    Keep in mind amidst the outrage is that things like what happened to Sycolria and her baby are literally an everyday occurrence in this country. The CDC's last admission was that they got about 400 reports a year of live births during abortions, and their spokesman, Willard Cates, said that this number was no doubt a gross underreporting because reporting a live birth is "like turning yourself in to the IRS for an audit." This is an everyday occurrence. Keep that in mind.

    For more about babies that survive abortions, click on the "born alive" topic just below this post.

    Abortion shocker: AP covering live birth murder story

    HT: Secondhand Smoke

    It's one of those, "Should I complain?" moments. After all, they are covering the story, which must stick in their craws. But I still have bones to pick, starting with the headline:

    Fla. doctor investigated in badly botched abortion

    I've never seen the AP cover a mother's death as a "badly botched abortion". It's just an abortion. An ordinary abortion. But if the baby survives, it's not just botched -- it's badly botched. Like the worst possible thing that can happen, far worse than any other unintended outcome -- the mother needing a colostomy, or a teenage girl ending up with a hysterectomy, or the mother dying -- is a live birth. I guess I can see their point -- with anything else that goes wrong, the aim of the abortion -- a dead baby -- was still achieved. But if that's their measure, this one wasn't so badly botched, since the baby did end up dead.

    They're pretty factual after that, though it wasn't Sycloria's pregnancy Renelique was being paid to terminate. It was her baby. After all, the termination of the pregnancy was a success. But then:

    What Williams and the Health Department say happened next has shocked people on both sides of the abortion debate: One of the clinic's owners, who has no medical license, cut the infant's umbilical cord. Williams says the woman placed the baby in a plastic biohazard bag and threw it out.


    Yeah, I suppose some people were shocked, and that the shocked people were on both sides. But to be shocked, what took place has to come as somewhat of a surprise. Raise your hand if you were the least bit surprised that:

    1. An unlicensed clinic owner was tending to a patient in an abortion facility because there was no doctor present.

    2. A baby, born alive in an abortion facility, was put in a biohazard bag.

    3. The live baby was then disposed of.

    Is any part of that particularly surprising to anybody here? It's all very dismaying, yes, but about as surprising and shocking as frat pledges getting drunk at a toga party.

    The only shocking component to the entire sordid situation is that the AP is covering it.

    Now to other aspects of the situation:

    "It really disturbed me," said Joanne Sterner, president of the Broward County chapter of the National Organization for Women, after reviewing the administrative complaint against Renelique. "I know that there are clinics out there like this. And I hope that we can keep (women) from going to these types of clinics."


    Not "We need to close these types of clinics." Just hope that women don't stumble into them. Is this attitude familiar? Oh, yeah! That was in Florida, too! Remember these words:

    "In my gut, I am completely aghast at what goes on at that place [Dadeland]. But I staunchly oppose anything that would correct this situation in law."


    That was Janis Compton-Carr, National Abortion Federation member and co-founder of FLAC -- the Florida Abortion Council. FLAC was founded block state efforts to close seedy abortion mills.

    Now, here is where I have to give the AP kudos, not merely credit:

    At 23 weeks, an otherwise healthy fetus would have a slim but legitimate chance of survival. Quadruplets born at 23 weeks last year at The Nebraska Medical Center survived.

    An autopsy determined Williams' baby — she named her Shanice — had filled her lungs with air, meaning she had been born alive, according to the Department of Health. The cause of death was listed as extreme prematurity.


    So not only did they cover the story, but they included information the reader would need in order to understand why it would be appropriate to charge Gonzales with murder in Shaniece's death.

    Shocking!

    So close, Bill! Take just one more step!

    Bill Gates went to pretty drastic means to impress upon people the importance of malaria eradication. Major, major, major kudos to Bill for taking up this un-glamourous cause. Major, major, major kudos for having this passion for the needs of the world's poorest people, when he is one of the world's richest.

    Now, Bill, just get this into your head: Poor people are just as entitled as us well-off folks to the joys of parenthood. They don't need you financing crews to go around spaying and neutering them and offering cheap abortions, as if they're so many stray animals we need to keep from breeding. Stop giving money to population control groups and start diverting it all to basic sanitation infrastructure so that they and their children can live and thrive.

    You're almost there, Bill!

    Let's pray for him!

    The Gutierrez Abortion: The Battle Lost

    On this date in 1996, 21-year-old Carolina Gutierrez lost her battle with post-abortion sepsis.

    Just four days earlier, doctors had amputated her gangrenous feet, hoping that this would free up her immune system to battle the infection that had been raging since her abortion on December 19, 1995.

    Carolina had been hospitalized since December 21, when her family had called an ambulance in their alarm over her difficulty breathing. Two days of trying to contact Maber Medical Center, where Carolina had undergone the abortion, had yielded no help. The voice mails she left had gone unanswered. When somebody finally did pick up the phone, whoever it was had hung up on her. The young mother, who had no medical insurance, had been suffering from fever and pain since the evening of the 19th.

    She had arrived at the emergency room already in septic shock. Doctors had performed an emergency hysterectomy, trying to halt the spread of infection from her perforated uterus, but the sepsis had raged on.

    Carolina had spent her 21st birthday as she had spent Christmas and New Year's: on a respirator, sepsis raging through her body. Her two children from a previous relationship, now orphaned, had spent most of their time in the care of relatives as her husband, Jose Linarte, had spent as much time as he could by Carolina's side, waiting and praying.

    His prayers, like the doctors' efforts, had ultimately been in vain.

    For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:



    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    1929: Midwife's abortion customer dies

    On January 29, 1929, Louise Allman, age 25, underwent an abortion at the home of Amelia K. Jaruez, a midwife. The address is also listed as a medical facility, so evidently she provided care to legitimate patients there as well.

    On February 5, Louise died. Jaruez was held by the coroner on February 23, and indicted for homicide by a grand jury, but she was acquitted on July 2. My source doesn't say why.

    Research on criminal abortions shows a lot of roadblocks to successful conviction. Prolifers seeking to stop abortion with a ban would do well to study these cases before drafting their laws, so as to close the loopholes these abortionists would wriggle out through. And think creatively, asking, "If I was a lawyer, how would I try to help an abortionist beat the rap?"



    For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    Wednesday, February 04, 2009

    When the POC really is just tissue

    I had a fascinating conversation this evening. The gentleman in question argued that since there are so many early miscarriages, prolifers would want to try to save those babies if if was medically possible, right? I pointed out yes, preventing miscarriages is worthy and ought to be pursued.

    But then we hit a snag when I had a hard time explaining that not every early miscarriage of a pregnancy is an early miscarriage of a human embryo. Nobody, I pointed out, is collecting the miscarried entities to see what they are. They might not be viable human embryos that could possibly be saved. In fact, it's probable that what is being expelled is either a hydatidiform mole or a blighted ovum -- neither of which is a new human being. This conversation led me to bring up this old article:

    Two common prochoice euphamisms for the fetus destroyed by abortion -- "products of conception" and "pregnancy tissue" -- realy do accurately apply in those unusual circumstances when there is no fetus present in a pregnancy. The two conditions in which a woman shows all the symptoms of pregnancy but is not sheltering a new human being are gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) and blighted ovum.

    In GTD, the conception results in what is called a "hydatidiform mole." This is a cluster of tissue with an appearance somewhat similar to a bunch of grapes. Researchers aren't 100 percent in agreement as to what causes hydatidiform moles, but the current theory is that they are caused by double genetic input from the male. There are three basic ways hydatidiform moles are believed to form:
    • A sperm fertilizes an ova with no genetic material in it, so the sperm reproduces its chromosomes, making a mole that has two identical sets of haploid chromosomes from the male.
    • Two sperm fertilize an ova with no genetic material in it, producing a diploid mole with two different sets of chromosomes from the male.
    • Two sperm fertilize an apparently normal ova, causing a mole with three sets of chromosomes in stead of two. This produces a "partial mole," with molar tissue and a fetus with lethal abnormalities.


    As an aside, it is the formation of molar pregnancies that makes geneticists, such as Jerome Lejeune, believe that plans to enable two homosexual men to have biological children by replacing the genetic material in an ova with the genetic material from their sperm are doomed to failure.

    Hydatidiform moles usually are expelled naturally by the mother's body before twenty weeks of pregnancy. Sometimes they will cause potentially life-threatening symptoms and need to be removed by suction. Also, sometimes the abnormal cells can invade the uterus, causing hemorrhage. They can also become cancerous.

    In blighted ovum, a placenta and amniotic sac form, but there is no fetus in the sac. Some researchers seem to believe that a blighted ova is caused by the same abnormal conception process that causes hydatidiform moles. Others say that they are two different kinds of abnormalities.

    A blighted ova tends to be expelled naturally by the mothers body in the very early weeks of pregnancy. I've not seen any indication that they become invasive or cancerous, like hydatidiform moles.

    For a while there was a trend among abortion defenders to claim that the existence of hydatidiform moles proves that life can not begin at conception. After all, they argue, here's a hydatiform mole, with its own genetic makeup, and it's not a person. So since conception sometimes produces this blob of tissue that is obviously not a person, life can't begin at conception. We could use the same logic (if you can call it logic) to disprove the prochoice claim that life begins at birth. Some babies are stillborn. So sometimes at birth you don't get a live person; you get a little corpse. Does this prove that babies aren't alive? Hardly.

    More to the point, you can ask an abortion advocate when his life began, and when he says, "At birth," you can point to the existence of six billion other people on the planet and say that his life can't have begun at birth if birth can produce six billion currently living entities that are not him. An entity's existence begins when that entity comes into existence, and at conception we have either a blighted ovum, a hydatidiform mole, or a new human being.

    (And let's not squabble about twins. Conjoined twins Abby and Britty Hensel have just one body, but are two people, so I see no reason one body can't be two people before birth as well -- or why we can't recognize twinning as a form of asexual reproduction, which human beings are capable of doing only at a very early age.)

    Actually, the existence of hydatidiform moles underscores the prolife position. One need only compare a fetus with a molar pregnancy of the same gestation age to see very clearly the difference between "pregnancy tissue" and a viable embryonic human being. In fact, even in a partial mole, there is a clear difference between the doomed fetus, which is recognizably a fetus, and the molar tissue, as in this illustration:


    For those of you with a strong stomach, here are a removed mole and an aborted fetus, for your comparison:



    You can see that the mole really is just a blob of tissue, but that no matter how throughly shredded the embryo is, you can still see recognizable human body parts, such as arms, legs, hands, feet, and face. And even more to the point, if you leave the hydatidiform mole to itself, it will never develop into an organism, because it never was an organism to begin with. It will not differentiate into organs and organ systems. It has no capacity to do so. An embryo does.

    Nowhere is the difference between a hydatidiform mole and a viable fetus more vividly demonstrated than in those rare pregnancies in which a woman has a twin pregnancy -- one hydatidiform mole and one normal fetus. So far, there seem to only have been about 30 of these cases reported. The mole is much larger than the fetus, and of course has no organs, limbs, or behaviors. Sadly, although some doctors have tried to manage these pregnancies in ways that save the fetus, they tend to miscarry before the fetus is old enough to live outside the womb. Some do carry to viability, and are not associated with a high number of birth defects.

    Now, if prolifers really just had their knickers in a twist about what was being done to women's bodies, we'd object just as much to the destruction of hydatidiform moles as we do to the destruction of fetuses. We'd be just as outraged if a woman took chemicals to expel a blighted ovum as if she was taking them to cause the death of an embryo. But we're not. We're simply not interested. It's a medical matter, between a woman and her doctor, to decide how best to deal with a molar pregnancy or a blighted ovum, just as it's a medical matter, between a woman and her doctor, to decide how to deal with a fetus or embryo who has died but has not been naturally expelled.

    It's the killing of a new human being that we object to, not the removal of unwanted tissue from the uterus.

    Famous last words

    "I screwed up."

    Obama: ‘I Screwed Up’ on Nominations

    Suresh Gandotra: 'I Screwed Up' on Abortion

    Just saying that the parallel leaped out at me. Ironic, no, for a President who stands so much in solidarity with abortionists, to echo the words of one of the seediest ones ever to trod American soil?

    Abortion lobby gets what absolutist misses



    Yes, another smartass Pro Life News headline: INDIANA BILL REQUIRES ABORTION DOCTORS TO HAVE HOSPITAL PRIVILEGES (AND THEN YOU CAN KILL THE BABY)

    Evidently the Pro Life News editor doesn't understand something that the abortion lobby is capable of understanding: Most abortionists are circuit-riding quacks who can't get local hospital privileges. So what the bill boils down to in practice is, "No, you can't kill the baby."

    Does the Pro Life News editor object to areas being utterly without an abortionist, and the reduction of abortions that this invariably brings? If so, then he has common ground with the abortion lobby.

    What would this bill do, that the Pro Life News editor objects to? Why, it gives approval to abortion, as long as the doctor jumps through certain hoops! (This despite the fact that the bill's "prochoice" opponents know full well that it'll reduce abortion, and that reducing abortion is part of the sponsors' agenda. The editor of Pro Life News can't seem to get that abortionists are smart enough to realize that prolifers disapprove of their practice, and that any legislation we're pushing for has that as an underlying motive, regardless of whatever other motives might come into play.)

    Far better to actually kill the babies, perhaps maiming or killing some of the mothers while you're at it, than to not kill the babies at all, if you're going to be not-killing the babies while under the impression that we'd have been okay with you killing them as long as you had hospital privileges.

    You see, far more important than whether or not the babies live or die is whether or not the people who might have killed them understand that we disapprove. It's our passing of moral judgment that matters, and not whether or not the baby is torn to pieces and thrown out in the biohazard waste.

    Makes sense. Not to me...

    How to Make an Absolutist Happy

    1. Do not do anything to try to reach women who are contemplating abortions.

    2. Do not try to keep abortionists from injuring or killing women.

    3. Do not try in any way to limit abortions.

    If your effort can't save every baby in America slated for abortion, don't even bother trying.

    Just focus on one thing: The greater your scorn and contempt for other people's efforts to actually prevent abortions, the more God will love you, because you stood up for all the babies slated for abortion. Before you let them all get killed.



    Paradoxically, by their own logic, the absolutists should totally oppose overturning Roe. After all, if you overturn Roe, you're implying that the states have a right to permit abortion. So you're not defending all babies.

    Anything that might in any way be construed as "And then you can kill the baby" is evil.

    So do NOT be a prayer and counseling presence outside abortion mills. The message you're giving is, "Walk past us. And then you can kill the baby."

    Don't run a CPC. The message is, "Call this number. And then you can kill the baby."

    Don't put up prolife billboards. The message is, "Read this. And then you can kill the baby."

    Don't go to March for Life. The message is, "We'll rally here while you kill the baby."

    The only acceptable action is pushing relentlessly for a national personhood amendment. (After all, if you only push for it in your state, the message is, "Cross the state line into a neighboring state. And then you can kill the baby.")

    Once you have the national level personhood amendment, abortions will go back underground and will continue to happen, but everybody will know that it's without your approval.

    So the real message is, "Know that I disapprove and want you to go to jail. And then you can kill the baby."

    Though somehow -- and I realize this is evil of me -- I think that the issue of whether or not the baby dies is at least as important as how much the mother knew that you disapproved of killing it.

    Which death can raise the concern of the abortion lobby?

    Janyth Caldwell, age 36, died February 4, 1986, a month after George Wayne Patterson attempted to perform a safe and legal abortion on her. The Alabama state Medical Examiner attributed her death to loss of oxygen to the brain, due to internal hemorrhaging from an ectopic pregnancy.

    A proper pre-abortion examination should be able to determine if the pregnancy is ectopic, in which case standard abortion techniques will not touch the embryo. Proper post-abortion pathology reports would detect that no embryo was removed from the uterus, and would clue the abortionist in to the fact that the pregnancy was ectopic. Patterson evidently missed both of these opportunities to detect Janyth's ectopic pregnancy and prevent her death.

    Even though, in theory, women who choose abortion should be less likely to die of ectopic pregnancy complications, experiences shows that they're actually more likely to die, due to sloppy practices by abortion practitioners. Brenda Vise suffered this fate after getting abortion drugs at a clinic that was operating illegally after having been shut down by Tennessee authorities.

    As for Patterson, according to official documents, another Alabama woman, Mary Bradley, died after an abortion performed by a doctor identified as Wayne Patterson. The Alabama medical board lists no Dr. Wayne Patterson, only Dr. George Wayne Patterson, deceased, which leads me to believe that the same Dr. Patterson responsible for Janyth's death had also caused the death of Mary Bradley the year before. If anybody can confirm or disprove this theory, please let me know.

    Patterson himself also suffered an early death at somebody else's hands. He was gunned down outside a pornography theater in an apparent gangland slaying. (The Feminist Majority Foundation, and Revolutionary Worker refer to the slain doctor as "Wayne Patterson", which is further evidence that he is the same doctor responsible for Mary Bradley's death. The fact that this organization laments the gangland shooting of an abortionist, while ignoring the fact that he himself had evidently killed two women, underscores where such organizations' priorities are.)

    Hear Janyth's story in a minute:

    For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:



    To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.

    Tuesday, February 03, 2009

    Prayers for Calif. family

    4-Year-Old Killed After Climbing in Washing Machine

    A 4-year-old girl climbed into a front loading washer, and her little brother either hit or bumped a button that started the machine. It's estimated she was in there for at least two minutes before her mother found her, dead from blunt-force trauma.

    That mother will never be right again, and the little boy will be an emotional wreck because no matter how you couch it, no matter how accidental it was, his reality is going to be that he killed his sister. Trust me, I know whereof I speak. The fact that you were only a toddler when it happened and you intended no harm doesn't spare you any guilt or anguish.

    Prayers, prayers, prayers.

    Sometimes a hero needs a hero

    Library Waives Hudson River Pilot's Library Fees

    Seems Capt. Sully had a library book in the cargo hold when he ditched the plane in the Hudson. He called the library to ask for an extension and waiver of overdue fees.

    The library waived it all, and will put a dedication to him in the replacement book.

    It gets better. The topic of the book? Professional ethics.

    Oh, while we're off-topic: World's Coolest Dad (video)

    So much for that claim

    Abortion advocates tend to work on the assumption that if a woman walks in the abortion clinic door, she's made a rational, well-educated, well-considered decision. They tend to insist that the woman who walks in the door is very firm in her decision. They do this even in cases where the abortion clinic offers "options counseling" -- presumably to help the woman decide whether she really wants to go through with the abortion or not.

    But we don't need to look far for evidence that this isn't the case -- that women are undergoing abortions when their decisions weren't all that firm. And they could hardly be expected to be, considering the normal psychology of pregnancy plus the normal psychology of stress. It's normal to panic, to reject the pregnancy early on, only to change your mind later. And it's normal, during a time of stress, to go into full-scale "fight or flight" mode and make a rushed decision to escape the feelings of stress and fear.

    Here is one example of a young mother who suffered terribly and needlessly because of the assumption that just because she'd signed on the dotted line, she'd made a firm decision:

    Her name was April S.. She was underage when she went to Margaret Sanger Center for a vaccum aspiration abortion abortion on February 3, 1987. The abortion was performed by Dr. Norman E. Matthews.

    There were no fetal parts found in the examination of the tissue removed during the abortion, but nobody at Margaret Sanger Center told April that. She was sent home.

    Three months later, on May 7, another doctor examined April and noted that she was still pregnant, 22.5 weeks along. April "decided to keep the child due to the emotional trauma experienced by the first abortion procedure and the numerous additional risks to a late stage abortion."

    In other words, April learned that when push came to shove, she really didn't want her baby to die after all.

    Thus began a time of great anxiety for April. Ultrasounds performed between May 7 and June 29 showed decreasing amniotic fluid. It was on June 29 that April went into premature labor and underwent a c-section. Due to the low levels of amniotic fluid, the baby was born with chorioamnionitis, hypoplastic lungs, and Hyaline Membrane Disease. The baby died the following day.

    The child who had seemed unwanted enough to be slated for an abortion in early February became wanted by June. And this young mother, not even out of her teens, got to watch that child die. Though nobody can prove the abortion caused the string of complications that led to the baby's death, anybody who has ever lived through the death of a loved one knows the crushing guilt of wondering what you might have done to cause it, and how you might have prevented it. Imagine how April felt, reflecting back on that early attempt on her baby's life, as she watched the child dying.

    April is far from the only young mother to change her mind after an abortion fails. Other mothers have been known to change their minds after the abortion begins -- to the point where abortionist Douglas Karpan complained to his fellow National Abortion Federation members that the prolifers standing around outside his clinic, offering to help women who'd already started their abortions get the laminaria removed and go to term. Instead of asking how to improve his facility's counseling techniques so that they'd not be starting abortions on women who were so unsure of their choice that a chance word from a stranger outside the building could change their minds, he asked for advice on how to word his consent forms and how to browbeat his patients into following through with the abortions even after they'd decided they wanted their babies to live.

    How respectful of choice is that? To me, that sounds like a man focused either on his profit margin or scoring political points one patient at a time, not a doctor who cares about the women who are trusting him.

    It's not disrespectful of women to take into account normal psychology when they think abortion is their only option. These women are seeking, first of all, an irreversible medical or surgical procedure. What doctor allows patients to do this based on self-referral, without at least ensuring that they've had a thorough consult and really know what the risks and alternatives are? Consider the intensive informed consent process I went through in Germany, for oral surgery I had known for ten years that I desperately wanted. It turns out I didn't really want it that much after all, when I was made fully aware of the risks by a doctor who refused to do surgery on patients until he was satisfied that they really, truly understood the ramifications and had no doubts.

    Based on decades of research I've read, the stories of women who regretted their abortions or who changed their minds before, during, or afterward, I've postulated that this is what adequate informed consent would look like, if we were really treating abortion like a medical procedure, to be chosen by a woman in consultation with her doctor. Compare it to what they actually get.



    Read these stories. What kind of informed consent did these women have? How firm, really, were their decisions? How informed?

    Dr. Alec Bourne, who had successfully challenged abortion law in the UK by openly performing an abortion on a teenage rape victim, later wrote:

    "Those who plead for an extensive relaxation of the law [against abortion] have no idea of the very many cases where a woman who, during the first three months, makes a most impassioned appeal for her pregnancy to be 'finished,' later, when the baby is born, is thankful indeed that it was not killed while still an embryo. During my long years in practice I have had many a letter of the deepest gratitude for refusing to accede to an early appeal."


    When I was in labor with my daughter, I was in terrible pain, and I was begging for drugs. But my midwife respected me enough to find out if that was the pain talking, or if I had really changed my mind about the natural, drug-free childbirth I had wanted. Was she being disrespectful?

    Too often "choice" is about the pain or fear making a decision, and not about anybody really bothering to find out what the woman really wants.

    Now, many of you will ask, "So, are you saying that you're okay with abortion as long as the woman has chosen it freely and in an informed manner, consistent with her deeply held beliefs?" Well, no. Not any more than I'd be okay with anybody else killing an innocent person as long as they make the decision to kill freely and in an informed manner, consistent with their deeply held beliefs. But:

    1. If we limited abortions to only those cases, I doubt that we'd see even ten percent of the abortions we're seeing take place now. Sparing that many women and children is indeed a worthwhile goal.

    2. If prochoicers are really about choice, then they need to really think about what the choice in question is, and how it's made. Just getting the prochoice behind the idea of limiting abortions to those who really, truly, unequivocally and without question understand what an abortion destroys, and still want to go through with it, would go a long way to ending the practice.

    My goal is to get people to think -- both before going through with an abortion themselves, and before getting behind the status quo of self-referred abortions performed on women whose only "counseling" is by a salesperson helping them choose chemical or surgical.

    Monday, February 02, 2009

    Criminal abortionist sentenced

    Unlicensed California Abortionist Sentenced To Over 3 Years In Prison:

    Los Angeles, CA – Bertha Bugarin was sentenced in a Los Angeles court on Friday to 3 years, 4 months in prison for committing illegal abortions without a medical license. Prosecutors had asked for five years.

    ....

    Bugarin has a long history of total disregard for the law and the safety of women who came to her abortion business that once operated 11 abortion mills. At least six of Bugarin’s abortionists have