Those who insist that legalization of abortion keeps our daughters, sisters, friends, wives, and other loved ones safe might want to speak to Lou Ann Herron's father, Mike Gibb, who silently wept in the courtroom as he listened to witnesses describe how his daughter died from a safe-n-legal abortion.
On April 17, 1998, 33-year-old Lou Ann Herron bled to death after being left injured and inadequately attended at the now-defunct A to Z abortion facility in Phoenix. So egregious was the treatment Lou Ann got in their care that abortionist John Biskind, 75, and clinic administrator Carole Stuart-Schadoff, 63, were charged with manslaughter.
The Pregnancy
Medical assistant Sylvia Aragon wept on the witness stand as she said that Lou Ann's pregnancy was "too far along" for an abortion. Aragon said that she thought abortionist John Biskind kept ordering more and more ultrasound scans to try to get one that would document the pregnancy as being early enough for the abortion to be legal. A total of seven ultrasounds were done before an estimate of 23 weeks was obtained the day prior to the abortion. Although Arizona law allows the abortionist to have final judgment about whether or not the fetus is viable, and therefore past the legal limit for abortion, the standard point for viability is believed to be around 24 weeks. The ultrasound Aragon did on April 9 showed a 26-week fetus.
If the abortion was indeed being done after 24 weeks, Arizona law requires that two physicians be present. Biskind was the only physician attending Lou Ann's abortion. Arizona law also limits abortions after 24 weeks to those that an abortionist can try to justify on the grounds that it was necessary to preserve the health and safety of the mother. This is a nonsensical concept, since after 24 weeks a conscientious physician faced with a gravely ill patient will perform an emergency c-section in a hospital operating room; he will not perform a risky late abortion in a freestanding clinic.
There were no health concerns in Lou Ann's case anyway, the prosecution noted. She sought the abortion because she already had two children and was separated from her husband.
The Abortion
The abortion was performed at 1:30 p.m.
During the procedure, Biskind managed to tear a 2-inch hole in Lou Ann's uterus. A former Maricopa County medical examiner testified that the tear in Lou Anne's uterus was caused by medical instruments, and not by a fetal body part as the defense suggested. However, even had the injury been caused by a fetal body part, this is an expected complication. Nothing would have excused Biskind from his duty to notice and treat the injury.
The Aftermath
Biskind, his lawyer said, noted a small amount of blood on the sheets when he checked on Lou Ann after the abortion, but that he was not concerned because bleeding is normal after an abortion.
Two medical assistants testified that Lou Ann was very frightened about her condition as she lay in recovery. She begged, they said, to know what was wrong with her. She cried out in pain as she lay in a puddle of blood for three hours. Biskind fixed her IV (complaining that there was no qualified nurse on staff to do this), reassured her, and left the building, according to testimony.
Biskind left the clinic at about 3:45 p.m. Clinic administrator Carole Stuart-Schadoff had a staffer page Biskind 25 minutes later when Lou Ann's condition worsened. Biskind did not return to the clinic, but told staff to call 911.
Prosecutors estimate that by the time paramedics were summoned, Lou Ann had lost 2 to 3 liters of blood.
Emergency room physician John Gallagher testified that, based on his assessment of Lou Ann's condition, she could have been saved had she been brought into surgery promptly.
Gallagher trains paramedics for the Phoenix Fire Department. He said that the records he reviewed clearly indicated that Lou Ann's condition was life threatening as she lay bleeding for three hours after her abortion, and that Biskind should have recognized the severity of her injuries.
Gallagher testified that the records clearly indicated serious trouble at 1:25 p.m., 16 minutes after Lou Ann had been taken to the recovery room. He said that had he been treating her, he would have ordered more IV fluids and blood immediately, and summoned an ambulance to take her to a hospital where she could be treated in a properly equipped operating room.
Gallagher noted that during her last hours in the recovery room, Lou Ann became combative, anxious and frightened, and that she reported her legs were going numb. These, he noted, are all clear signs of severe blood loss. Instead of recognizing the danger she was in, Gallagher noted, Biskind instead tried to calm Lou Ann and reassure her that she would be "just fine."
When the rescue crew arrived, Phoenix fire captain Brian Tobin testified, Lou Ann was wearing an oxygen mask, but had not been intubated. There was also no IV in place. "I very quickly felt that there wasn't a lot of competent medical care going on at the time," he said.
Tobin testified that Lou Ann appeared to be dead. Nobody at the clinic seemed aware of how grave her condition was, he said, and nobody seemed to be helping her in any way. Staff told Tobin that Lou Ann's vitals were pulse 100, blood pressure 90/50. "It was very difficult for me to believe that they could get the vital signs of a woman who, even as we walked in the door, looked really dead," he said.
Damage Control
Biskind surrendered his license to practice medicine in Arizona after Lou Ann's death in order to stop an ongoing investigation of the circumstances and his handling of the case.
Dr. Sidney Wecsler, an abortion expert testifying for the prosecution, said that the letter Biskind wrote to the medical board describing Lou Ann's death misrepresented both her condition and his treatment of her.
The letter, dated June 1, 1998, said that Biskind checked on Lou Ann at 1:25 p.m., and that "pulse and blood pressure were satisfactory." The medical records, however, show that Lou Ann's blood pressure was low at that time, a symptom of blood loss so severe that the patient has already begun to decompensate. Biskind also said in the letter that Lou Ann was alert and talking when he left the clinic at 4:05, which Wecsler said would have been impossible for the moribund patient who was certainly dead by the time paramedics arrived twenty minutes later.
Wechsler said that Biskind surely knew as early as 3:15 p.m. that Lou Ann was not alert, because he ordered a drug to arouse her, which did not work. Biskind's letter makes no mention of administering this drug.
Biskind's defense has been claiming that the assistants at the clinic failed to keep Biskind informed of Lou Ann's deteriorating condition. But Biskind's letter to the medical board claims that he himself checked on her every 30 to 45 minutes.
The surrender of his license was enough to halt the board's investigation. But fortunately for women, unfortunately for Biskind, authorities with more power than the medical board were on the case.
The Trial
A doctor who specializes in obstetric ultrasounds also testified that the quality of the scan used to justify Lou Ann's abortion was so poor that it appeared the machine was defective and improperly used. The judge ordered struck from the record the expert's comment that reading an ultrasound properly is "a matter of life and death" for an unborn baby.
Biskind's defense was largely based on the idea that he would have not rationally have left the facility had he realized that Lou Ann was in danger of bleeding to death from the hole in her uterus. The defense also held that Biskind did not order multiple ultrasounds, that the fetus was accurately diagnosed as 23 weeks.
The prosecution noted that the clinic charged $1,250 for an abortion between 20 and 24 weeks, and indicated that this fee, and not any medical concern for Lou Ann, led Biskind to proceed with an abortion that never should have taken place.
Biskind's attorney also indicated that Biskind informed Lou Ann of the risks of a late abortion before she signed the consent form.
Biskind's co-defendant, Carole Stuart-Schanoff, had a defense based on the idea that as administrator of the facility, she had no role in patients' medical care and therefore was not responsible for what happened in the clinic she was running. Prosecutors point out that Stuart-Schadoff scheduled the abortion, and that she scheduled it despite knowing that there would be no registered nurse attending the recovery room that day. The prosecution also noted that Stuart-Schadoff delayed calling 911, choosing to call Biskind first.
Lois Montagno, an RN from the now closed A-Z Women's Center, testified that she told Stuart-Schadoff a week in advance that she would not be able to work past noon on August 17, 1998, the day Stuart-Schadoff scheduled Lou Ann Herron for her fatal abortion. This supports the prosecution's contention that Stuart-Schadoff was responsible for leaving Lou Ann in the care of medical assistants, who would not be qualified to supervise the recovery room.
Montagno also testified that she left a note to remind the supervisor, and told her as she was leaving on the 17th, reminding Stuart-Schadoff to tell Biskind that there would be no RN in the recovery room. Montagno did not tell Biskind she was leaving; she testified that he was in the procedure room at the time and she did not want to interrupt him.
Wechsler, the abortion expert testifying for the prosecution, was cross-examined by Biskind's lawyer. The lawyer contended that the assistants could have misjudged how much blood Lou Ann was losing, and that Lou Ann's low blood pressure may have been due to medication and not hemorrhage. Wechsler didn't budge from his initial assessment, that Biskind had plenty of evidence and had no legitimate reason to claim ignorance of Lou Ann's life-threatening condition.
Wechsler said that Biskind should have done a pelvic exam and other tests to determine exactly what was wrong with Lou Ann as she lay, frantic and bleeding, in the recovery room. If nothing else, Wechsler said, the fact that Lou Ann was still in recovery three hours after her abortion, long after other patients were up and about and discharged from the facility, should have alerted Biskind to the fact that something was seriously wrong.
Prosecutors summarized the case, noting that Biskind had failed to detect that he had torn a 2-inch hole in Lou Ann's uterus, had failed to notice that she was hemorrhaging from her injury, and had left the moribund patient with no registered nurse or other physician to attend to her while he left to keep an appointment with a tailor. Stuart-Schadoff was charged because she had scheduled Lou Ann for a risky late abortion despite the fact that there would be no registered nurse attending patients in the recovery room.
Prosecutors reiterated the testimony that Biskind had ordered a total of seven ultrasounds performed, with estimates ranging from 23 weeks 3 days to 26 weeks. However, only the ultrasound that showed the pregnancy as 23 weeks 3 days was forwarded to the medical examiner; the others were lost or destroyed by the facility.
Biskind's defense held that no attempts were made to fudge ultrasounds, nor were records tampered with or destroyed.
Stuart-Schadoff's defense held that she had no medical training and was not involved in the abortion itself, and therefore was not responsible for the death of the patient at the clinic where she was administrator.
The Verdict
Lou Ann's family, which occupied two rows of the courtroom during the trial, wept as the verdicts were read. They met with members of the jury afterward.
It took a jury of seven women and one man about 4 1/2 hours to find John Biskind and Carol Stuart-Schadoff guilty in Lou Ann's death.
Jury foreman Russell Craig, 56, spoke for the jury in the aftermath of the trial. He reported that he and other jurors were haunted by vivid dreams. He was particularly disturbed by the autopsy photos.
Upon retiring to deliberate at 1:30 p.m. on Tuesday, the jury had immediately agreed that the defendants were guilty. It was simply a matter of deciding which charges they were guilty of: the manslaughter charge, or the lesser charge of negligent homicide.
According to Craig, Biskind was his own worst enemy. "At one point when the prosecutor had finished his closing arguments," Craig told a reporter, "he applauded. It certainly didn't make much of an impression."
Only after the trial was over did members of the jury learn of Biskind's history of misconduct, including the previous death of another abortion patient, Lisa Bardsley. Craig said that this information "makes me feel better about my decision."
After the verdict, County Attorney Romley called for tougher laws addressing the way the Board of Medical Examiners handles doctors with problems.
The Owner
A-Z owner Moshe Hachamovitch testified, news reports say, "reluctantly and under tight security. When questioned about his knowledge of procedures at the facility, and about Lou Ann's death, he responded, "I don't remember." He did, however, indicate that he called Biskind a few weeks after the death to discuss the case, but did not say what, if any, conclusions he reached about how the situation was handled.
Hachamovitch admitted that the clinic did not have a procedures manual, but said that Biskind was "excellent at doing second-trimester abortions."
Hachamovitch indicated that he himself is an expert on late abortions, having performed "hundreds of thousands of them" during his 41 years of practice, going back to pre-Roe days in New York. However, Hachamovitch's license had been suspended in New York for nine months on the grounds of gross negligence, gross incompetence, and inaccurate patient records. His license was again suspended in New York last year for practicing fraudulently and failing to maintain adequate records.
Hachamovitch himself was directly responsible for the botched-abortion deaths of Luz Rodriguez, Tanya Williamson, and Christina Goesswein. He also owned -- and was supposed to be overseeing -- the Texas abortion facility where Jammie Garcia was fatally injured.
Even a cursory review of these cases shows how little care and thought went into Hachamovitch's supervision of his facilities.
Has Anything Changed?
"Lou Ann's Law" was passed in Arizona in 1999. It set forth safety regulations intended to prevent other abortion clinics from following the same sloppy, slipshod practices that cost Lou Ann Herron her life. It established minimum standards of care for staff qualifications, procedures to provide emergency care, sanitation, infection control, necessary equipment, quality assurance, and proper maintenance of patient records.
Abortion proponents immediately challenged the law to prevent it from being implemented.
For more abortion deaths, visit the Cemetery of Choice:
To email this post to a friend, use the icon below.
No comments:
Post a Comment